1 |
Bordelon RL. Evaluation and operative procedures for hallux valgus deformity. Orthopedics.1987;10:38-44.
|
2 |
Coughlin MJ, Mann RA, Saltzman CL. Surgery of the foot and ankle. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Mosby Elsevier; 2007. 183-362.
|
3 |
Mann RA. Bunion surgery: decision making. Orthopedics. 1990;13:951-7.
|
4 |
Pique-Vidal C, Maled-Garcia I, Arabi-Moreno J, Vila J. Radiographic angles in hallux valgus: differences between measurements made manually and with a computerized program. Foot Ankle Int. 2006;27:175-80.
DOI
|
5 |
Hur G, Hwang YJ, Cha SJ, Kim SY, Kim YH. Optimization of digital mammography resolution using magnification technique in computed radiography. J Korean Radiol Soc. 2004;50:447-52.
DOI
|
6 |
Coughlin MJ, Saltzman CL, Nunley JA 2nd. Angular measurements in the evaluation of hallux valgus deformities: a report of the ad hoc committee of the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society on angular measurements. Foot Ankle Int. 2002;23:68-74.
DOI
|
7 |
Coughlin MJ, Jones CP. Hallux valgus: demographics, etiology, and radiographic assessment. Foot Ankle Int. 2007;28:759-77.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
8 |
Pisano ED, Cole EB, Hemminger BM, et al. Image processing algorithms for digital mammography: a pictorial essay. Radiographics. 2000;20:1479-91.
DOI
|
9 |
De Carvalho A, Vialle R, Thomsen L, et al. Reliability analysis for manual measurement of coronal plane deformity in adolescent scoliosis. Are 30 x 90 cm plain films better than digitized small films? Eur Spine J. 2007;16:1615-20.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
10 |
Van Vo H, Safiedine AM, Short T, Merrill T. A comparison of 4 common methods of hand-measured techniques with a computerized technique to measure the first intermetatarsal angle. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2004;43:395-9.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
11 |
Lin JS, Bustillo J. Surgical treatment of hallux valgus: a review. Curr Opin Orthop. 2007;18:112-7.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
12 |
Bargman J, Corless JR, Gross AE, Lange F. A review of surgical procedure for hallux valgus. Foot Ankle. 1980;1:39-43.
DOI
|
13 |
Coughlin MJ. Roger A. Mann Award. Juvenile hallux valgus: etiology and treatment. Foot Ankle Int. 1995;16:682-97.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
14 |
Kang CN, Choi KJ, Lee DY, Sung IH. The computerized measurement for the radiological severity of hallux valgus. J Korean Foot Ankle Soc. 2009;13:1-6.
|
15 |
Schneider W, Csepan R, Kasparek M, Pinggera O, Knahr K. Intra- and interobserver repeatability of radiographic measurements in hallux surgery: improvement and validation of a method. Acta Orthop Scand. 2002;73:670-3.
|
16 |
Panchbhavi VK, Trevino S. Comparison between manual and computer-assisted measurements of hallux valgus parameters. Foot Ankle Int. 2004;25:708-11.
DOI
|
17 |
Resch S, Ryd L, Stenstrom A, Johnsson K, Reynisson K. Measuring hallux valgus: a comparison of conventional radiography and clinical parameters with regard to measurement accuracy. Foot Ankle Int. 1995;16:267-70.
DOI
ScienceOn
|