Computerized Measurement on Angular Parameters for Hallux Valgus: Comparison of 100% and 150% Magnified Digital Radiography |
Sung, Il-Hoon
(Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hanyang University College of Medicine)
Lee, Doo-Yeon (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hanyang University College of Medicine) Sung, Chang-Ho (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hanyang University College of Medicine) Seo, Woo-Young (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hanyang University College of Medicine) |
1 | Bordelon RL. Evaluation and operative procedures for hallux valgus deformity. Orthopedics.1987;10:38-44. |
2 | Coughlin MJ, Mann RA, Saltzman CL. Surgery of the foot and ankle. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Mosby Elsevier; 2007. 183-362. |
3 | Mann RA. Bunion surgery: decision making. Orthopedics. 1990;13:951-7. |
4 | Pique-Vidal C, Maled-Garcia I, Arabi-Moreno J, Vila J. Radiographic angles in hallux valgus: differences between measurements made manually and with a computerized program. Foot Ankle Int. 2006;27:175-80. DOI |
5 | Hur G, Hwang YJ, Cha SJ, Kim SY, Kim YH. Optimization of digital mammography resolution using magnification technique in computed radiography. J Korean Radiol Soc. 2004;50:447-52. DOI |
6 | Coughlin MJ, Saltzman CL, Nunley JA 2nd. Angular measurements in the evaluation of hallux valgus deformities: a report of the ad hoc committee of the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society on angular measurements. Foot Ankle Int. 2002;23:68-74. DOI |
7 | Coughlin MJ, Jones CP. Hallux valgus: demographics, etiology, and radiographic assessment. Foot Ankle Int. 2007;28:759-77. DOI ScienceOn |
8 | Pisano ED, Cole EB, Hemminger BM, et al. Image processing algorithms for digital mammography: a pictorial essay. Radiographics. 2000;20:1479-91. DOI |
9 | De Carvalho A, Vialle R, Thomsen L, et al. Reliability analysis for manual measurement of coronal plane deformity in adolescent scoliosis. Are 30 x 90 cm plain films better than digitized small films? Eur Spine J. 2007;16:1615-20. DOI ScienceOn |
10 | Van Vo H, Safiedine AM, Short T, Merrill T. A comparison of 4 common methods of hand-measured techniques with a computerized technique to measure the first intermetatarsal angle. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2004;43:395-9. DOI ScienceOn |
11 | Lin JS, Bustillo J. Surgical treatment of hallux valgus: a review. Curr Opin Orthop. 2007;18:112-7. DOI ScienceOn |
12 | Bargman J, Corless JR, Gross AE, Lange F. A review of surgical procedure for hallux valgus. Foot Ankle. 1980;1:39-43. DOI |
13 | Coughlin MJ. Roger A. Mann Award. Juvenile hallux valgus: etiology and treatment. Foot Ankle Int. 1995;16:682-97. DOI ScienceOn |
14 | Kang CN, Choi KJ, Lee DY, Sung IH. The computerized measurement for the radiological severity of hallux valgus. J Korean Foot Ankle Soc. 2009;13:1-6. |
15 | Schneider W, Csepan R, Kasparek M, Pinggera O, Knahr K. Intra- and interobserver repeatability of radiographic measurements in hallux surgery: improvement and validation of a method. Acta Orthop Scand. 2002;73:670-3. |
16 | Panchbhavi VK, Trevino S. Comparison between manual and computer-assisted measurements of hallux valgus parameters. Foot Ankle Int. 2004;25:708-11. DOI |
17 | Resch S, Ryd L, Stenstrom A, Johnsson K, Reynisson K. Measuring hallux valgus: a comparison of conventional radiography and clinical parameters with regard to measurement accuracy. Foot Ankle Int. 1995;16:267-70. DOI ScienceOn |