Browse > Article

Total Ankle Replacement  

Choi, Gi-Won (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine)
Choi, Woo-Jin (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine)
Lee, Jin-Woo (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Foot and Ankle Society / v.15, no.3, 2011 , pp. 132-138 More about this Journal
Abstract
Although first generation total ankle replacement (TAR) had high failure rates, recent investigations have reported good results of the newer generations of TAR due to advances in implant designs and techniques. Patient selection is critical to performing TAR to obtain promising outcomes and to decrease complication rate. As the current concepts of correcting the accompanying deformity have been established, TAR in moderate to severe varus deformity of the ankle result in favorable outcomes and indications for TAR are expanding. Correction of deformity and hindfoot fusion should be performed in conjunction with TAR if needed. If radiolucency around components or osteolysis is progressive during follow-up, CT should be carried out as a confirmative diagnostic method. TAR is an effective treatment modality alternative to ankle fusion. However, we should recognize that TAR is a demanding procedure, which requires accurate techniques, enough experience, and preoperative plan for a concomitant deformity.
Keywords
Ankle; Arthroplasty; Replacement;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Knecht SI, Estin M, Callaghan JJ, et al. The Agility total ankle arthroplasty. Seven to sixteen-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86-A:1161-71.
2 Courville XF, Hecht PJ, Tosteson AN. Is total ankle arthroplasty a cost-effective alternative to ankle fusion? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:1721-7.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Thomas RH, Daniels TR. Ankle arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85-A:923-36.
4 Bonnin M, Judet T, Colombier JA, Buscayret F, Graveleau N, Piriou P. Midterm results of the Salto Total Ankle Prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;(424):6-18.
5 Bai LB, Lee KB, Song EK, Yoon TR, Seon JK. Total ankle arthroplasty outcome comparison for post-traumatic and primary osteoarthritis. Foot Ankle Int. 2010;31:1048-56.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Haddad SL, Coetzee JC, Estok R, Fahrbach K, Banel D, Nalysnyk L. Intermediate and long-term outcomes of total ankle arthroplasty and ankle arthrodesis. A systematic review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:1899-905.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Anderson T, Montgomery F, Carlsson A. Uncemented STAR total ankle prostheses. Three to eight-year follow-up of fifty- one consecutive ankles. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85-A: 1321-9.
8 Hanna RS, Haddad SL, Lazarus ML. Evaluation of periprosthetic lucency after total ankle arthroplasty: helical CT versus conventional radiography. Foot Ankle Int. 2007;28: 921-6.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Spirt AA, Assal M, Hansen ST Jr. Complications and failure after total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004; 86-A:1172-8.
10 Kennedy JG, Hodgkins CW, Brodsky A, Bohne WH. Outcomes after standardized screw fixation technique of ankle arthrodesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;447:112-8.   DOI
11 Morgan CD, Henke JA, Bailey RW, Kaufer H. Long-term results of tibiotalar arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985;67: 546-50.   DOI
12 Saltzman CL, Mann RA, Ahrens JE, et al. Prospective controlled trial of STAR total ankle replacement versus ankle fusion: initial results. Foot Ankle Int. 2009l;30:579-96.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Conti SF, Wong YS. Complications of total ankle replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;(391):105-14.
14 Gougoulias N, Khanna A, Maffulli N. How successful are current ankle replacements?: a systematic review of the literature. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:199-208.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Hintermann B, Valderrabano V, Dereymaeker G, Dick W. The HINTEGRA ankle: rationale and short-term results of 122 consecutive ankles. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;(424):57-68.
16 Valderrabano V, Hintermann B, Dick W. Scandinavian total ankle replacement: a 3.7-year average followup of 65 patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;(424):47-56.
17 Gould JS, Alvine FG, Mann RA, Sanders RW, Walling AK. Total ankle replacement: a surgical discussion. Part I. Replacement systems, indications, and contraindications. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2000;29:604-9.
18 Kim BS, Knupp M, Zwicky L, Lee JW, Hintermann B. Total ankle replacement in association with hindfoot fusion: Outcome and complications. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;92: 1540-7.
19 Lord G, Marotte JH. Total ankle prosthesis. Technic and 1st results. Apropos of 12 cases. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1973;59:139-51.
20 Stengel D, Bauwens K, Ekkernkamp A, Cramer J. Efficacy of total ankle replacement with meniscal-bearing devices: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2005;125:109-19.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Dini AA, Bassett FH 3rd. Evaluation of the early result of Smith total ankle replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980;(146):228-30.
22 Kitaoka HB, Patzer GL. Clinical results of the Mayo total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78:1658-64.   DOI
23 Kim BS, Choi WJ, Kim YS, Lee JW. Total ankle replacement in moderate to severe varus deformity of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91:1183-90.
24 Hobson SA, Karantana A, Dhar S. Total ankle replacement in patients with significant pre-operative deformity of the hindfoot. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91:481-6.
25 Wood PL, Deakin S. Total ankle replacement. The results in 200 ankles. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85:334-41.   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Ahmad J, Raikin SM. Ankle arthrodesis: the simple and the complex. Foot Ankle Clin. 2008;13:381-400.   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Doets HC, Brand R, Nelissen RG. Total ankle arthroplasty in inflammatory joint disease with use of two mobile-bearing designs. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:1272-84.   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Guyer AJ, Richardson G. Current concepts review: total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int. 2008;29:256-64.   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Hintermann B, Valderrabano V. Total ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Clin. 2003;8:375-405.   DOI   ScienceOn
30 Deorio JK, Easley ME. Total ankle arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect. 2008;57:383-413.
31 Pyevich MT, Saltzman CL, Callaghan JJ, Alvine FG. Total ankle arthroplasty: a unique design. Two to twelve-year follow- up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80:1410-20.   DOI