Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.15268/ksim.2020.8.4.001

Effects of Microcurrent on Inflammatory Musculoskeletal Diseases: A Meta-Analysis  

Lee, Jeongwoo (Dept. of Physical Therapy, Kwangju Women's University)
Ko, Un (Dept. of Physical Therapy, Suwan Medical Center)
Doo, Yeongtaek (Dept. of Physical Therapy, Kwangju Women's University)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Society of Integrative Medicine / v.8, no.4, 2020 , pp. 1-11 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose : The purpose of this meta-analysis was to examine the effects of microcurrent on inflammatory musculoskeletal diseases. Methods : Domestic databases (RISS, NDSL, KISS, DBpia, and Kmbase) were searched for studies that conducted clinical trials associated with microcurrent and its impact on inflammatory musculoskeletal diseases. A total of 606 studies published between 2002 and 2019 were identified, with 8 studies satisfying the inclusion data. The studies were classified according to patient, intervention, comparison, and outcome (PICO). The search outcomes were items associated with blood component, pain, and function. The 8 studies that were included in the study were evaluated using R meta-analysis (version 4.0). The quality of 7 randomized control trials was evaluated using Cochrane risk of bias (ROB). The quality of 1 non-randomized control trial was evaluated using risk of bias assessment tool for non-randomized studies (RoBANS). Effect sizes were computed as the corrected standard mean difference (SMD). A random-effect model was used to analyze the effect size because of the high heterogeneity among the studies. Egger's regression test was carried out to analyze the publishing bias. Results : The following factors had a large effect size involving microcurrent on inflammatory musculoskeletal diseases: blood component (Hedges's g=-2.46, 95 % CI=-4.20~-0.73), pain (Hedges's g=3.51, 95 % CI=2.44~4.77), and function (Hedges's g=3.06, 95 % CI: 1.53~4.58). Except for function (t=1.572, p=.191), Egger's regression test showed that the publishing bias had statistically significant differences. Conclusion : This study provides evidence for the effectiveness of microcurrent on inflammatory musculoskeletal diseases in terms of blood component, pain, and function. However, due to the small sample sizes used in the included studies, the results of our study should be interpreted cautiously, especially considering the publishing bias.
Keywords
inflammatory musculoskeletal disease; microcurrent; pain; meta-analysis;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Kim YP(2007). Anti-hyperalgesic effects of electroacupuncture combination of MENS or meloxicam gel in rat with inflammation. Graduate school of Dongshin University, Republic of Korea, Master's thesis.
2 Kim KJ, Hong HS, Park WJ, et al(2016). Effects of an abdominal obesity management program on physiological bio-markers of middle-aged women in Korea: a meta-analysis. Korean J Obes, 25(3), 138-149. https://doi.org/10.7570/kjo.2016.25.3.138.   DOI
3 Kim SY, Park JE, Lee YJ, et al(2013). Testing a tool for assessing the risk of bias for nonrandomized studies showed moderated reliability and promising validity. J Clin Epidemiol, 66(4), 408-414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.09.016.   DOI
4 Kwon DR, Kim JH, Kim YM, et al(2017). Short-term microcurrent electrical neuromuscular stimulation to improve muscle function in the elderly: a randomized, double-blinded, sham-controlled clinical strial. Medicine, 96(26), Printed Online. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000007407.   DOI
5 Kwon HC(2019). Development and evaluation of micro-current stimulator for lateral epicondylitis treatment. Graduate school of Konyang University, Republic of Korea, Master's thesis.
6 Sullivan GM, Feinn R(2012). Using effect size-or why the p value is not enough. J Grad Med Educ, 4(3), 279-282. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-12-00156.1.   DOI
7 McMakin CR(2011). Frequency-specific microcurrent in pain management. Edinburgh, Churchill Livingstone, Elsevier, pp.26, 136.
8 Lee BO, Hwan SY, Lee KM, et al(2002). The effect of microcurrent therapy on adjuvant induced rheumatoid arthritis in rats. Korean J Clin Lab Sci, 34(2), 193-200.
9 Lee HM, Lee SY, Chang JS, et al(2010). Effect of microcurrent therapy on interleukin-6 expression in adjuvant induced rheumatoid arthritis rat model. J Korean Soc Phys Med, 5(4), 551-558.
10 McMakin CR, Gregory WM, Phillips TM(2004). Cytokine changes with microcurrent treatment of fibromyalgia associated with cervical spine trauma. J Bodyw Mov Ther, 9(3), 169-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2004.12.003.   DOI
11 Armstrong K, Gokal R, Chevalier A, et al(2017). Microcurrent point stimulation applied to lower back acupuncture points for the treatment of nonspecific neck pain. J Altern Complement Med, 23(4), 295-299. https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2016.0313.   DOI
12 Yang SN, Byun CW, Yoon JS, et al(2011). Effect of microcurrent on pain and walking ability in patient with knee osteoarthritis. Journal of Sport and Leisure Studies, 46(2), 1213-1221.   DOI
13 Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available at https://handbook-5-1.cochrane.org/. Accessed Sep 14, 2020.
14 Nair HKR(2018). Microcurrent as an adjunct therapy to accelerate chronic wound healing and reduce patient pain. J Wound Care, 27(5), 296-306. https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2018.27.5.296.   DOI
15 Ahmed AF, Elgayed SA, Ibrahim IM(2012). Polarity effect of microcurrent electrical stimulation on tendon healing: Biomechanical and histopathological studies. J Adv Res, 3(2), 109-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2011.05.004.   DOI
16 Arendt-Nielsen L, Fernández-de-las-Penas C, Graven-Nielsen T(2011). Basic aspects of musculoskeletal pain: from acute to chronic pain. J Man Manip Ther, 19(4), 186-193. https://doi.org/10.1179/106698111X13129729551903.   DOI
17 Barnes R, Shahin Y, Gohil R, et al(2014). Electrical stimulation vs. standard care for chronic ulcer healing: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Eur J Clin Invest, 44(4), 429-440. https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.12244.   DOI
18 Cho NJ, Song SH(2014). Effects of microcurrent delayed onset muscle soreness on creatine kinase. J Korean Soc Integrative Med, 2(3), 31-37. https://doi.org/10.15268/ksim.2014.2.3.031.   DOI
19 Cheng N, Van Hoof H, Bockx E, et al(1982). The effects of electric currents on ATP generation, protein synthesis, and membrane transport in rat skin. Clin Orthop, 171, 264-272. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-198211000-00045.   DOI
20 Cho HY(2012). The effects of polarity of microcurrent on anti-inflammatory in rat model of acute and chronic inflammation induced. Graduate school of Seonam University, Republic of Korea, Doctoral dissertation.
21 Chung JS, Cho NJ(2015). Micro-current treatment effects on pain, balance of the degenerative knee arthritis. J Korean Soc Integrative Med, 3(2), 9-16. https://doi.org/10.15268/ksim.2015.3.2.009.   DOI
22 Cohen J(1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed, Hillsdale, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, pp.25-26.
23 Gallo J, Raska M, Kriegova E, et al(2017). Inflammation and its resolution and the musculoskeletal system. J Orthop Translat, 10, 52-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jot.2017.05.007.   DOI
24 Hwang SD(2016). Meta-analysis using R. 1st ed, Seoul, Hakjisa, pp.134-201.
25 Hiroshige Y, Watanabe D, Aibara C, et al(2018). The efficacy of microcurrent therapy on eccentric contraction-induced muscle damage in rat fast-twitch skeletal muscle. Open J App Sci, 8(3), 89-102. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojapps.2018.83008.   DOI
26 Huedo-Medina T, Sanchez-Meca J, Marin-Martinez F, et al(2006). Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I2 index?. Psychol Methods, 11(2), 193-206. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.11.2.193.   DOI
27 Jin HK(2010). The effect of microcurrent stimulation intensity on osteoarthritis in rat. Graduate school of Seonam University, Republic of Korea, Master's thesis.