Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2011.44.2.123

Short-term Clinical Outcomes Based on Risk Factors of Recurrence after Removing Common Bile Duct Stones with Endoscopic Papillary Large Balloon Dilatation  

Kim, Jung-Ho (Department of Internal Medicine, Gachon University Gil Hospital, Gachon University of Medicine and Science)
Kim, Yeon-Suk (Department of Internal Medicine, Gachon University Gil Hospital, Gachon University of Medicine and Science)
Kim, Dong-Kyu (Department of Internal Medicine, Gachon University Gil Hospital, Gachon University of Medicine and Science)
Ha, Min-Su (Department of Internal Medicine, Gachon University Gil Hospital, Gachon University of Medicine and Science)
Lee, Young-Jun (Department of Internal Medicine, Gachon University Gil Hospital, Gachon University of Medicine and Science)
Lee, Jong-Joon (Department of Internal Medicine, Gachon University Gil Hospital, Gachon University of Medicine and Science)
Lee, Sang-Jin (Department of Internal Medicine, Gachon University Gil Hospital, Gachon University of Medicine and Science)
Won, In-Sik (Department of Internal Medicine, Gachon University Gil Hospital, Gachon University of Medicine and Science)
Ku, Yang-Suh (Department of Internal Medicine, Gachon University Gil Hospital, Gachon University of Medicine and Science)
Kim, Yun-Soo (Department of Internal Medicine, Gachon University Gil Hospital, Gachon University of Medicine and Science)
Kim, Ju-Hyun (Department of Internal Medicine, Gachon University Gil Hospital, Gachon University of Medicine and Science)
Publication Information
Clinical Endoscopy / v.44, no.2, 2011 , pp. 123-128 More about this Journal
Abstract
Background/Aims: Recurrence is an important late complication of endotherapy of bile duct stones. Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation (EPLBD) can be used as an alternative method of removing difficult bile duct stones. The aim of this study was to evaluate short term clinical outcomes after removing common bile duct (CBD) stones using EPLBD. Methods: A retrospective review was performed based on the medical records of 141 patients who received EPLBD, with or without endoscopic sphincterotomy, between September 2008 and February 2010. Of these, 50 patients, were enrolled in the study. Clinical and endoscopic parameters were analyzed to identify risk factors for CBD stones recurrence. Results: Male:Female ratio was 22:28 (mean age, 67.4${\pm}$14.4 years). Recurrence rate was 24.0% (12/50). Mean follow-up period was 10.8${\pm}$4.5 months. Nineteen (38.0%) had a history of surgery and 20 (40.0%) were comorbid with periampullary diverticula. Mean diameters of the stones and CBD were 13.8${\pm}$4.3 mm and 20.1${\pm}$7.2 mm, respectively. In univariate analysis, large CBD stones (${\geq}$12 mm) and angulated CBD (angle ${\leq}145^{\circ}$) were identified as the significant predictors of recurrence. In multivariate analysis, angulated CBD (angle ${\leq}145^{\circ}$) was the significant independent risk factor for recurrence. Conclusions: Close follow-up seems necessary in patients with angulated CBD (angle ${\leq}145^{\circ}$).
Keywords
Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilatation; Common bile duct stones; Recurrence; Risk factor;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Pereira-Lima JC, Jakobs R, Winter UH, et al. Long-term results (7 to 10 years) of endoscopic papillotomy for choledocholithiasis. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors for the recurrence of biliary symptoms. Gastrointest Endosc 1998;48:457-464.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Cotton PB, Geenen JE, Sherman S, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy for stones by experts is safe, even in younger patients with normal ducts. Ann Surg 1998;227:201-204.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S, et al. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med 1996;335:909-918.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Ersoz G, Tekesin O, Ozutemiz AO, Gunsar F. Biliary sphincterotomy plus dilation with a large balloon for bile duct stones that are difficult to extract. Gastrointest Endosc 2003;57:156-159.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Kim DI, Kim MH, Lee SK, et al. Risk factors for recurrence of primary bile duct stones after endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. Gastrointest Endosc 2001;54:42-48.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Keizman D, Shalom MI, Konikoff FM. An angulated common bile duct predisposes to recurrent symptomatic bile duct stones after endoscopic stone extraction. Surg Endosc 2006;20:1594-1599.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Prat F, Malak NA, Pelletier G, et al. Biliary symptoms and complications more than 8 years after endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis. Gastroenterology 1996;110:894-899.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Hawes RH, Cotton PB, Vallon AG. Follow-up 6 to 11 years after duodenoscopic sphincterotomy for stones in patients with prior cholecystectomy. Gastroenterology 1990;98:1008-1012.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Kim HJ, Choi HS, Park JH, et al. Factors influencing the technical diffi-culty of endoscopic clearance of bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc 2007;66:1154-1160.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Lobo DN, Balfour TW, Iftikhar SY, Rowlands BJ. Periampullary diverticula and pancreaticobiliary disease. Br J Surg 1999;86:588-597.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy com-plications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc 1991;37:383-393.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Maydeo A, Bhandari S. Balloon sphincteroplasty for removing difficult bile duct stones. Endoscopy 2007;39:958-961.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Baron TH, Harewood GC. Endoscopic balloon dilation of the biliary sphincter compared to endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy for removal of common bile duct stones during ERCP: a metaanalysis of randomized, controlled trials. Am J Gastroenterol 2004;99:1455-1460.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Fujita N, Maguchi H, Komatsu Y, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy and endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation for bile duct stones: a pro-spective randomized controlled multicenter trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2003;57:151-155.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Minami A, Hirose S, Nomoto T, Hayakawa S. Small sphincterotomy com-bined with papillary dilation with large balloon permits retrieval of large stones without mechanical lithotripsy. World J Gastroenterol 2007;13: 2179-2182.   DOI
16 Attasaranya S, Cheon YK, Vittal H, et al. Large-diameter biliary orifice balloon dilation to aid in endoscopic bile duct stone removal: a multicenter series. Gastrointest Endosc 2008;67:1046-1052.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Cheon YK, Lehman GA. Identification of risk factors for stone recurrence after endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006;18:461-464.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Ohashi A, Tamada K, Wada S, et al. Risk factors for recurrent bile duct stones after endoscopic papillary balloon dilation: long-term follow-up study. Dig Endosc 2009;21:73-77.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Ando T, Tsuyuguchi T, Okugawa T, et al. Risk factors for recurrent bile duct stones after endoscopic papillotomy. Gut 2003;52:116-121.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Miyazawa Y, Okinaga K, Nishida K, Okano T. Recurrent common bile duct stones associated with periampullary duodenal diverticula and calcium bilirubinate stones. Int Surg 1995;80:120-124.
21 Novacek G, Walgram M, Bauer P, Schöfl R, Gangl A, Pötzi R. The relationship between juxtapapillary duodenal diverticula and biliary stone disease. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1997;9:375-379.   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Baek YH, Kim HJ, Park JH, et al. Risk factors for recurrent bile duct st-ones after endoscopic clearance of common bile duct stones. Korean J Gastroenterol 2009;54:36-41.   DOI   ScienceOn