Browse > Article

Management of Duodenal Perforations after Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography  

Kim, Jong-Hyun (Department of Surgery, Inha University School of Medicine)
Lee, Keon-Young (Department of Surgery, Inha University School of Medicine)
Ahn, Seung-Ik (Department of Surgery, Inha University School of Medicine)
Hong, Kee-Chun (Department of Surgery, Inha University School of Medicine)
Jung, Seok (Department of Internal Medicine, Inha University School of Medicine)
Lee, Don-Haeng (Department of Internal Medicine, Inha University School of Medicine)
Choe, Yun-Mee (Department of Surgery, Inha University School of Medicine)
Choi, Sun-Keun (Department of Surgery, Inha University School of Medicine)
Hur, Yoon-Seok (Department of Surgery, Inha University School of Medicine)
Kim, Sei-Joong (Department of Surgery, Inha University School of Medicine)
Cho, Young-Up (Department of Surgery, Inha University School of Medicine)
Shin, Seok-Hwan (Department of Surgery, Inha University School of Medicine)
Kim, Kyung-Rae (Department of Surgery, Inha University School of Medicine)
Publication Information
Clinical Endoscopy / v.42, no.2, 2011 , pp. 83-89 More about this Journal
Abstract
Background/Aims: Surgery has been the mainstay of treatment for duodenal perforations after the introduction of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Yet there have recently been arguments that conservative management with or without endoscopic intervention may be possible and safe. Methods: For the patients who received ERCP at Inha University Hospital from Jan. 2001 to Dec. 2007, we retrospectively analyzed the clinical manifestations, the treatment and the clinical outcomes of the cases with duodenal perforation. Results: Among the 1708 ERCP cases, duodenal perforation occurred in eleven (0.6%) patients. There were two cases of duodenal perforations (type I), four cases of peri-Vaterian injury (type II), two cases of bile duct perforations (type III) and three cases of retroperitoneal perforations (type IV). Six patients (55%) were treated surgically while the others were managed conservatively. Except for one death (9.1%), ten patients fully recovered. Either residual diseases or fluid collections, as seen on CT, were present in the surgically managed patients. The median time interval between ERCP and surgery was 19 hours (range: 8~30 hours). Conclusions: To decide on the management of duodenal perforation after ERCP, the presence of residual disease or the leakage of intraluminal contents should be considered along with the type of the perforation.
Keywords
Management; Duodenum; Perforation; ERCP;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 4  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S, et al. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med 1996;335:909-918.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Vandervoort J, Soetikno RM, Tham TC, et al. Risk factors for complications after performance of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 2002;56:652-656.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Cho MS, Park DE, Chae KM. Management for duodenal perforation caused by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). J Korean Surg Soc 2007;72:210-215.
4 Choi JS, Kim MH, Lee SS, et al. The clinical course of ERCP-related bowel perforation. Korean J Gastrointest Endosc 2004;29:63-69.
5 Enns R, Eloubeidi MA, Mergener K, et al. ERCP-related perforations: risk factors and management. Endosocpy 2002;34:293-298.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Preetha M, Chung YF, Chan WH, et al. Surgical management of endoscopic retrograde cholagiopancreatography-related perforations. ANZ J Surg 2003;73:1011-1014.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Howard TJ, Tan T, Lehman GA, et al. Classification and management of perforations complicating endoscopic sphincterotomy. Surgery 1999;126:658-663.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Stapfer M, Selby RR, Stain SC, et al. Management of duodenal perforation after endoscopic retrograde cholagiopancreatography and sphincterotomy. Ann Surg 2000;232:191-198.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Roses LL, Ramirez AG, Seco AL, et al. Clip closure of a duodenal perforation secondary to a biliary stent. Gastrointest Endosc 2000;51:487-489.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Fatima J, Baron TH, Topazian MD, et al. Pancreaticobiliary and duodenal perforations after periampullary endoscopic procedures: diagnosis and management. Arch Surg 2007;142:448-454.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Avgerinos DV, Llaguna OH, Lo AY, Voli J, Leitman IM. Management of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: related duodenal perforations. Surg Endosc 2009;23:833-838.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Scarlett PY, Falk GL. The management of perforation of the duodenum following endoscopic sphincterotomy: a proposal for selective therapy. Aust N Z J Surg 1994;64:843-846.   DOI
13 Wu HM, Dixon E, May GR, Sutherland FR. Management of perforation after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): a population-based review. HPB (Oxford) 2006;8:393-399.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Cicek B, Parlak E, Disibeyaz S, Koksal AS, Sahin B. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with Billroth II gastroenterostomy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007;22:1210-1213.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Martin DF, Tweedle DE. Retroperitoneal perforation during ERCP and endoscopic sphincterotomy: causes, clinical features and management. Endoscopy 1990;22:174-175.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Lee TH, Bang BW, Jeong JI, et al. Primary endoscopic approximation suture under cap-assisted endoscopy of an ERCP-induced duodenal perforation. World J Gastroenterol 2010;16:2305-2310.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Lee J, Ko KH, Kim JK, et al. A case of type I duodenal perforation treated with covered metal stent. Korean J Gastrointest Endosc 2005;30:95-98.
18 Lee YJ, Lee SU, Sun IO, et al. Two cases of successful clipping closure of iatrogenic duodenal perforation occurred during endoscopic procedure. Korean J Gastrointest Endosc 2006;32:210-214.
19 Genzlinger JL, McPhee MS, Fisher JK, Jacob KM, Helzberg JH. Significance of retroperitoneal air after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with sphincterotomy. Am J Gastroenterol 1999;94:1267-1270.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc 1991;37:383-393.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Zissin R, Shapiro-Feinberg M, Oscadchy A, Pomeranz I, Leichtmann G, Novis B. Retroperitoneal perforation during endoscopic sphincterotomy: imaging findings. Abdom Imaging 2000;25:279-282.   DOI   ScienceOn