Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3345/cep.2019.01494

Health effects of electromagnetic fields on children  

Moon, Jin-Hwa (Department of Pediatrics, Hanyang University School of Medicine)
Publication Information
Clinical and Experimental Pediatrics / v.63, no.11, 2020 , pp. 422-428 More about this Journal
Abstract
In today's world, most children are exposed to various manmade electromagnetic fields (EMFs). EMFs are electromagnetic waves less than 300 GHz. A developing child's brain is vulnerable to electromagnetic radiation; thus, their caregivers' concerns about the health effects of EMFs are increasing. EMF exposure is divided into 2 categories: extremely low frequencies (ELFs; 3-3,000 Hz), involving high-voltage transmission lines and in-house wiring; and radiofrequencies (RFs; 30 kHz to 300 GHz), involving mobile phones, smart devices, base stations, WiFi, and 5G technologies. The biological effects of EMFs on humans include stimulation, thermal, and nonthermal, the latter of which is the least known. Among the various health issues related to EMFs, the most important issue is human carcinogenicity. According to the International Agency for Research on Cancer's (IARC's) evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans, ELFs and RFs were evaluated as possible human carcinogens (Group 2B). However, the World Health Organization's (WHO's) view of EMFs remains undetermined. This article reviews the current knowledge of EMF exposure on humans, specifically children. EMF exposure sources, biological effects, current WHO and IARC opinions on carcinogenicity, and effects of EMF exposures on children will be discussed. As well-controlled EMF experiments in children are nearly impossible, scientific knowledge should be interpreted objectively. Precautionary approaches are recommended for children until the potential health effects of EMF are confirmed.
Keywords
Electromagnetic field; Extremely low frequency; Radiofrequency; Smart device; Child;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz). International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection. Health Phys 1998;74:494-522.
2 Bas O, Odaci E, Kaplan S, Acer N, Ucok K, Colakoglu S. 900 MHz electromagnetic field exposure affects qualitative and quantitative features of hippocampal pyramidal cells in the adult female rat. Brain Res 2009;1265:178-85.   DOI
3 World Health Organization [Internet]. Electromagnetic fields and public health; exposure to extremely low frequency fields. Geneva (Switzerland): World Health Organization; [updated 2007 Jun; cited 2019 Oct 5]. Available from: https://www.who.int/peh-emf/publications/facts/fs322/en/.
4 Aldad TS, Gan G, Gao XB, Taylor HS. Fetal radiofrequency radiation exposure from 800-1900 mhz-rated cellular telephones affects neurodevelopment and behavior in mice. Sci Rep 2012;2:312.   DOI
5 Schirmacher A, Winters S, Fischer S, Goeke J, Galla HJ, Kullnick U, et al. Electromagnetic fields (1.8 GHz) increase the permeability to sucrose of the blood-brain barrier in vitro. Bioelectromagnetics 2000;21:338-45.   DOI
6 Nittby H, Brun A, Eberhardt J, Malmgren L, Persson BR, Salford LG. Increased blood-brain barrier permeability in mammalian brain 7 days after exposure to the radiation from a GSM-900 mobile phone. Pathophysiology 2009;16:103-12.   DOI
7 Electromagnetic field (EMF) [Internet]. Seoul (Korea): EMF; c2005 [cited 2019 Oct 5]. Available from: http://www.emf.or.kr/.
8 Gye MC, Park CJ. Effect of electromagnetic field exposure on the reproductive system. Clin Exp Reprod Med 2012;39:1-9.   DOI
9 Kaplan S, Deniz OG, Onger ME, Turkmen AP, Yurt KK, Aydin I, et al. Electromagnetic field and brain development. J Chem Neuroanat 2016;75(Pt B):52-61.   DOI
10 Dasdag S, Akdag MZ, Erdal ME, Erdal N, Ay OI, Ay ME, et al. Effects of 2.4 GHz radiofrequency radiation emitted from Wi-Fi equipment on microRNA expression in brain tissue. Int J Radiat Biol 2015;91:555-61.   DOI
11 National Radio Research Agency [Internet]. Naju (Korea): National Radio Research Agency; c2018 [cited 2019 Oct 10]. Available from: https://rra.go.kr/ko/index.do/.
12 Korea Communications Agency [Internet]. Naju (Korea): Korea Communications Agency; c2014 [cited 2019 Oct 10]. Available from: https://emf.kca.kr/.
13 Korea Electric Power Corporation [Internet]. Naju (Korea): Korea Electric Power Corporation; c2019 [cited 2019 Oct 10]. Available from: http://home.kepco.co.kr/kepco/KO/D/A/KODAPP001.do?menuCd=FN050401/.
14 Maaroufi K, Save E, Poucet B, Sakly M, Abdelmelek H, Had-Aissouni L. Oxidative stress and prevention of the adaptive response to chronic iron overload in the brain of young adult rats exposed to a 150 kilohertz electromagnetic field. Neuroscience 2011;186:39-47.   DOI
15 World Health Organization. Electromagnetic fields and public health: mobile phones [Internet]. Geneva (Switzerland): World HealthOrganization; 2014 Oct [cited 2019 Oct 10]. Available from: https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/electromagnetic-fields-and-publichealth-mobile-phones.
16 International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection. Exposure to static and low frequency electromagnetic fields, biological effects and health consequences (0-100 kHz). Munich (Germany): International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection, 2003.
17 Hardell L. World Health Organization, radiofrequency radiation and health - a hard nut to crack (Review). Int J Oncol 2017;51:405-13.   DOI
18 INTERPHONE Study Group. Brain tumour risk in relation to mobile telephone use: results of the INTERPHONE international case-control study. Int J Epidemiol 2010;39:675-94.   DOI
19 Di Ciaula A. Towards 5G communication systems: are there health implications? Int J Hyg Environ Health 2018;221:367-75.   DOI
20 Frey AH. Headaches from cellular telephones: are they real and what are the implications? Environ Health Perspect 1998;106:101-3.   DOI
21 Divan HA, Kheifets L, Obel C, Olsen J. Cell phone use and behavioural problems in young children. J Epidemiol Community Health 2012;66:524-9.   DOI
22 Science for Environment Policy (2017) The precautionary priniple: decision making under uncertainty. Future Brief 18. Produced for the European Commission DG Environment by the Science Communication Unit, UWE, Bristol [Internet]. [cited 2019 Oct 10]. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/science-environment-policy.
23 Warille AA, Onger ME, Turkmen AP, Deniz OG, Altun G, Yurt KK, et al. Controversies on electromagnetic field exposure and the nervous systems of children. Histol Histopathol 2016;31:461-8.
24 Abramson MJ, Benke GP, Dimitriadis C, Inyang IO, Sim MR, Wolfe RS, et al. Mobile telephone use is associated with changes in cognitive function in young adolescents. Bioelectromagnetics 2009;30:678-86.   DOI
25 Cain N, Gradisar M. Electronic media use and sleep in school-aged children and adolescents: A review. Sleep Med 2010;11:735-42.   DOI
26 Maskey D, Pradhan J, Aryal B, Lee CM, Choi IY, Park KS, et al. Chronic 835-MHz radiofrequency exposure to mice hippocampus alters the distribution of calbindin and GFAP immunoreactivity. Brain Res 2010;1346:237-46.   DOI
27 Kritikos HN, Schwan HP. Hot spots generated in conducting spheres by electromagnetic waves and biological implications. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1972;19:53-8.   DOI
28 van Rongen E, Roubos EW, van Aernsbergen LM, Brussaard G, Havenaar J, Koops FB, et al. Mobile phones and children: is precaution warranted? Bioelectromagnetics 2004;25:142-4.   DOI
29 Grigoriev Y. Mobile phones and children: is precaution warranted? Bioelectromagnetics 2004;25:322-3.   DOI
30 Wiart J, Hadjem A, Gadi N, Bloch I, Wong MF, Pradier A, et al. Modeling of RF head exposure in children. Bioelectromagnetics 2005;Suppl 7:S19-30.
31 Redmayne M. International policy and advisory response regarding children's exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF). Electromagn Biol Med 2016;35:176-85.   DOI
32 Thomas S, Heinrich S, von Kries R, Radon K. Exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields and behavioural problems in Bavarian children and adolescents. Eur J Epidemiol 2010;25:135-41.   DOI
33 Calvente I, Perez-Lobato R, Nunez MI, Ramos R, Guxens M, Villalba J, et al. Does exposure to environmental radiofrequency electromagnetic fields cause cognitive and behavioral effects in 10-year-old boys? Bioelectromagnetics 2016;37:25-36.   DOI
34 Divan HA, Kheifets L, Obel C, Olsen J. Prenatal and postnatal exposure to cell phone use and behavioral problems in children. Epidemiology 2008;19:523-9.   DOI
35 IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Non-ionizing radiation, Part 2: Radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum 2013;102(Pt 2):1-460.
36 Hutter HP, Moshammer H, Wallner P, Kundi M. Subjective symptoms, sleeping problems, and cognitive performance in subjects living near mobile phone base stations. Occup Environ Med 2006;63:307-13.   DOI
37 Martens L. Electromagnetic safety of children using wireless phones: a literature review. Bioelectromagnetics 2005;Suppl 7:S133-7.
38 Cabre-Riera A, Torrent M, Donaire-Gonzalez D, Vrijheid M, Cardis E, Guxens M. Telecommunication devices use, screen time and sleep in adolescents. Environ Res 2019;171:341-7.   DOI
39 Huss A, van Eijsden M, Guxens M, Beekhuizen J, van Strien R, Kromhout H, et al. Environmental radiofrequency electromagnetic fields exposure at home, mobile and cordless phone use, and sleep problems in 7-year-old children. PLoS One 2015;10:e0139869.   DOI
40 Final Report Summary - MOBI-KIDS (risk of brain cancer from exposure to radiofrequency fields in childhood and adolescence) [Internet]. CORDIS; 2017 [updated 2017 Jan; cited 2019 Nov 15]. Available from: https://cordis.europa.eu/project/rcn/89894/reporting/en.
41 Sadetzki S, Langer CE, Bruchim R, Kundi M, Merletti F, Vermeulen R, et al. The MOBI-Kids Study Protocol: challenges in assessing childhood and adolescent exposure to electromagnetic fields from wireless telecommunication technologies and possible association with brain tumor risk. Front Public Health 2014;2:124.
42 Choi HD, Kim N. 5G jeonjapawa inche yeonghyang. In: Proceedings of the Korea Electromagnetic Engineering Society 2018;29:26-30.
43 Wagner P, Roschke J, Mann K, Hiller W, Frank C. Human sleep under the influence of pulsed radiofrequency electromagnetic fields: a polysomnographic study using standardized conditions. Bioelectromagnetics 1998;19:199-202.   DOI
44 Guxens M, Vermeulen R, van Eijsden M, Beekhuizen J, Vrijkotte TGM, van Strien RT, et al. Outdoor and indoor sources of residential radiofrequency electromagnetic fields, personal cell phone and cordless phone use, and cognitive function in 5-6 years old children. Environ Res 2016;150:364-74.   DOI
45 Odaci E, Bas O, Kaplan S. Effects of prenatal exposure to a 900 MHz electromagnetic field on the dentate gyrus of rats: a stereological and histopathological study. Brain Res 2008;1238:224-9.   DOI
46 Russell CL. 5 G wireless telecommunications expansion: public health and environmental implications. Environ Res 2018;165:484-95.   DOI
47 Repacholi M, Saunders R, van Deventer E, Kheifets L. Guest editors' introduction: is EMF a potential environmental risk for children? Bioelectromagnetics 2005;Suppl 7:S2-4.
48 Hocking B, Westerman R. Neurological effects of radiofrequency radiation. Occup Med (Lond) 2003;53:123-7.   DOI
49 Panagopoulos DJ. Chromosome damage in human cells induced by UMTS mobile telephony radiation. Gen Physiol Biophys 2019;38:445-54.   DOI
50 Ha M, Im H, Lee M, Kim HJ, Kim BC, Gimm YM, et al. Radio-frequency radiation exposure from AM radio transmitters and childhood leukemia and brain cancer. Am J Epidemiol 2007;166:270-9.   DOI
51 Stewart W. Mobile phones and health, report of independent expert group on mobile phones. Chilton (UK): IEGMP Secretariat, 2000.
52 Salford LG, Brun AE, Eberhardt JL, Malmgren L, Persson BR. Nerve cell damage in mammalian brain after exposure to microwaves from GSM mobile phones. Environ Health Perspect 2003;111:881-3.   DOI
53 Kheifets L, Repacholi M, Saunders R, van Deventer E. The sensitivity of children to electromagnetic fields. Pediatrics 2005;116:e303-13.   DOI
54 IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Non-ionizing radiation, Part 1: static and extremely low-frequency (ELF) electric and magnetic fields. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum 2002;80:1-395.
55 National Institute of Environmental Research [Internet]. Incheon (Korea): National Institute of Environmental Research; [cited 2019 Oct 17]. Available from: http://www.nier.go.kr/NIER/cop/bbs/selectNoLoginBoardArticle.do.
56 Markov M, Grigoriev Y. Protect children from EMF. Electromagn Biol Med 2015;34:251-6.   DOI