Browse > Article

Clinacal investigation of child sexual abuse  

Lee, Hyun Joo (Department of Pediatrics, National Police Hospital)
Han, Hye Jung (Department of Pediatrics, National Police Hospital)
Kim, Ji Hee (Department of Pediatrics, National Police Hospital)
Lee, Hye Sun (Department of Pediatrics, National Police Hospital)
Lee, In Sil (Department of Pediatrics, National Police Hospital)
Publication Information
Clinical and Experimental Pediatrics / v.50, no.1, 2007 , pp. 20-27 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose : Child sexual abuse is a significant and serious problem that affects public health and society. Pediatricians are responsible for preventing and detecting sexual abuse of children. The aim of this study was to examine clinical findings of child sexual abuse. Methods : The authors retrospectively studied 292 patients between the ages of 0 and 18 who were referred for evaluation of sexual abuse to the Emergency Department of the National Police Hospital from Oct 1, 2001 to May 5, 2005. Results : Sixty three (21.6 percent) of sexual abuse victims were younger than 6 years of age; 89 (30.5 percent) were 6-12 years of age; and 104 (47.9 percent) were 12-18 years of age. Attack time was the most common between noon and 6 pm. Victims were attacked in their home or nearby (51.4 percent). One hundred fifty six (53.6 percent) offenders were accquaitances, thirty nine (13.4 percent) of whom were family members. The disclosure of attack by parents with abnormal physical symptoms was more common in younger children than in adolescence. Eighty nine (30.5 percent) victims had no specific physical findings, 51 percent had injury to the hymen, 37.3% had injury to external genitalia, and 4 percent had anal injury. One case of gonorrhea and thirteen cases of chlamydia were found. Sperm was found in 19 cases and acid phosphatase was positive in 28 cases. The absence of physical findings and laboratory findings was more common in younger children than in those in adolescence. The time interval from attacks to hospital visits had a significant negative correlation with age. Conclusion : For younger victims, the time interval from attack to hospital visitis was more prolonged. Victims may have no physical evidence of sexual abuse. Therefore, a careful history should be obtained and a through physical examination should be performed. Pediatricians must play a leading role in evaluation and treatment of sexually abused children, considering children,s growth and development. Coordination with other professionals is necessary to provide consultation, medical treatment, and legal assistance for the sexually abused children and families.
Keywords
Child sexual abuse;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Heger A, Ticson L, Velasquez O, Bernier R. Children referred for possible sexual abuse: medical findings in 2384 children. Child Abuse Neglect 2002;26:645-59   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Bowen K, Aldous MB. Medical evaluation of sexual abuse in children without disclosed or witnessed abuse. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1999;153:1160-4   DOI
3 Frank WP. Ten-year research update review: child sexual abuse. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2003;42:269-78   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Dube SR, Anda RF, Whitfield CL, Brown DW, Felitti VJ, Dong M, et al. Long-term consequences of childhood sexual abuse by gender of victim. Am J Prev Med 2005;28:430-8   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Muram D. Childs sexual abuse: relationship between sexual acts and genital findings. Child Abuse Negl 1989;13:211-6   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Siegel RM, Schubert CJ, Meyers PA, Shapiro RA. The prevalence of sexually transmitted diseases in children and adolescents evaluated for sexual abuse in Cincinnati: rationale for limited STD testing in prepubertal girls. Pediatrics 1995;96:1090-4
7 Swanston HY, Tebbutt JS. Sexually abused children 5 years after presentation. Pediatrics 1997;100:600-8   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Ricci LR, Hoffman SA. Prostatic acid phosphatase and sperm in the post-coital vagina. Ann Emerg Med 1982;11:530-4   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Finkelhor D. Current information on the scope and nature of child sexual abuse. Future Child 1994;4:31-53   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Forbes F, Duffy JC, Mok J, Lemvig J. Early intervention service for non-abusing parents of victims of child sexual abuse: Pilot study. Br J Psychiatry 2003;183:66-72   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Hymel KP, Child JC. Child sexual abuse. Pediatr Rev 1996;17:236-50   DOI
12 Finkelhor D. Epidemiological factors in the clinical identification of child sexual abuse. Child Abuse Negl 1993;17:67-70   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Ingram DM, Everett VD, Ingram DL. The relationship between the transeverse hymenal orifice diameter by the separation technique and other possible markers of sex abuse. Child Abuse Negl 2001;25:1109-20
14 Browning DH, Boatman B. Incest: Chilren at risk. Am J Psychiatry 1977;134:69-72   DOI
15 Kellogg N. The evaluation of sexual abuse in children. Pediatrics 2005;116,506-12   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Schumann GB, Badawy S, Peglow A, Henry JB, Hammerschlag MR. Prostatic acid phosphatase. Am J Clin Pathol 1976;66:944-52   DOI
17 Hong KE, Kang BG, Kwack YS. A survey of intrafamilial child sexual abuse by physicians, reports. Korean J Child Adol Psychiatr 1998;9:138-47
18 Ministry Health & Welfare National Child Protection Agency. The report of child sexual abuse in the whole country 2005;1-6
19 Koss MP, Koss PG, Woodruff WJ. Deleterious effects of criminal victimization of women's health and medical utilization. Arch Intern Med 1991;151:342-7   DOI
20 Weinstein D, Staffelbach D, Biaggio M. Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder: differential diagnosis in childhood sexual abuse. Clin Psychol Rev 2000;20:359-78   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Sobsey D, Randall W, Parrila R. Gender differences in abused children with and without disabilities. Child Abuse Negl 1997;21:707-20
22 Cheung PC, Ko CH, Lee HY, Ho LM, To WW, Ip PL. Correlation of colposcopic anogenital findings and overall assessment of child sexual abuse. Hong Kong Med J 2004;10:378-83
23 Lahoti SL, McClain N, Girardet R, McNeese M, Cheung K. Evaluating the child for sexual abuse. Am Fam Physician 2001;63:883-92
24 American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect. Guidelines for the evaluation of sexual abuse of children. Pediatrics 1999;103:186-91   DOI
25 Gorey K, Leslie D. The prevalence of child sexual abuse. Child Abuse Negl 1997;21:391-8   DOI   ScienceOn
26 McCann J, Voris J, Simon M. Genital injuries resulting from sexual abuse: a longitudinal study. Pediatrics 1992;89:307-17
27 Muram D. Genital tract injuries in the prepubertal child. Pediatr Ann 1986;15:616-20
28 Drach KM, Wientzen J. Ricci LR. The diagnosic utility of sexual behavior problems in diagnosing sexual abuse in a forensic child abuse evaluation clinic. Child Abuse Neglect 2001;25:489-503   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Gold SN, Hughes DM, Swingle JM. Characteristics of childhood sexual abuse among female survivors in therapy. Pediatrics 1996;20:323-5
30 Swanston HY, Tebbutt JS, O,Toole BI, Oates RK. Sexually abused children 5 years after presentation: a case control study. Pediatrics 1997;100:600-8   DOI   ScienceOn
31 McCann J. The appearance of acute, healing and healed anogenital trauma. Child Abuse Negl 1998;22:605-15   DOI   ScienceOn
32 Melisa MH, Heidi SR. Follow-up of sexual assult victims. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;179:336-42   DOI   ScienceOn
33 Johnson CF. Sexual abuse in children. Pediatr Rev 2006;27: 17-27   DOI
34 Adams JA. Medical evaluation of suspected child sexual abuse. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2004;17:191-7   DOI   ScienceOn
35 Kempe CH. Sexual abuse, another hidden pediatric problem. Pediatrics 1978;62:382-9
36 Freyd JJ, Putnam FW, Lyon TD, Becker-Blease KA, Cheit RE, Siegel NB. The science of child sexual abuse. Science 2005;308:501   DOI
37 Kimerling R, Calhoun K. Somatic symptoms, social support, and treatment seeking among sexual assault victims. J Consult Clin Psychol 1994;62:333-40   DOI   ScienceOn