Browse > Article

Tacrolimus versus Cyclosporine Immunosuppression in Pediatric Renal Transplantation : Pharmacokinetic Consideration  

Kim, Jung Sue (Department of Pediatrics, Cheongju St.Mary's Hospital)
Publication Information
Clinical and Experimental Pediatrics / v.48, no.5, 2005 , pp. 476-480 More about this Journal
Abstract
Immunosuppressive therapy in pediatric renal transplant recipients is changing consequence of the increasing number of available immunosuppressive agents. The optimal use of immunosuppressive agents requires a thorough understanding of the pharmacokinetic characteristics, but the information on the pharmacokinetic characteristics of these drugs in pediatric transplant recipients is still limited. In general, patients younger than 5 years old show higher clearance rates, therefore the need for higher dosages in younger patients seems evident. By the therapeutic drug monitoring, trough($C_{min}$) and peak level($C_{max}$) are measured and the area under the blood concentration-time curve(AUC), which is taken as being representative of total systemic exposure can be calculated. Cyclosporine A (CSA) has poor bioavailability, which contributes to high inter- and intra-patient pharmacokinetic variability. CSA concentration measured 2 hours after administration($C_2$) has better correlation with the AUC than $C_{min}$ and is an alternative technique that predicts the AUC. Tacrolimus(Tac) has a great deal of inter-individual variability like CSA but intra-individual variability in systemic exposure is considered to be low. Both CSA and Tac are metabolized by a cytochrome P-450 enzyme isoform(CYP3A4). We should consider changing the dosages when CSA or Tac is used in combination with the medicines that inhibit or induce the CYP3A4. In case of steroid-free immunosuppressive therapy, the blood concentration of Tac should be frequently checked and dosage adjustment may be needed.
Keywords
Cyclosporine; Tacrolimus; Pharmacokinetics;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Cacciarelli TV, Green M, Jaffe R, Mazariegos GV, Jain A, Fung JJ, et al. Management of posttransplant lymphopro!iferative disease in pediatric liver transplant recipients receiving primary tacrolimus(FK506) therapy. Transplantation 1998;66:1047-52   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Undre NA. Pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus-based combination therapies. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2003;18(suppl 1): i12-i15   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Sanchez CP, Salusky I, Kuizou B, Ramirez JA, Gates B, Ettenger RB, et al. Bone disease in children and adolescents undergoing successful renal transplantation. Kidney Int 1998;53:1358-64   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Ratcliffe PJ, Dudley CR, Higgins RM, Firth JD, Smith B, Morris PJ Randomized controlled trial of steroid withdrawal in renal transplant recipients receiving triple immunosuppression. Lancet 1996;348:643-8   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Chakrabarti P, Wong HY, Scantlebury VP, Jordan ML, Vivas C, Ellis D, et al. Outcome after steroid withdrawal in pediatric renal transplantation patients receiving tacrolimusbased immunosuppression. Transplantation 2000;70:760-4   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Filler G, Grygas R, Mai I, Stolpe HJ, Greiner C, Bauer S, et al. Pharmacokinetic of tacrolirnus(FK-506) in children and adolescents with renal transplants. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1997;12:1668-71   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Knoll GA, Bell RC. Tacrolimus versus cyclosporine for immunosuppression in renal transplantation: meta-analysis of randomized trials. BMJ 1999;318:1104-7   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Del Mar Fernandez De Gatta M, Santos-Buelga D, Dominguez-Gil A, Garcia MJ. Immunosuppressive therapy for pediatric transplant patients: Pharmacokinetic considerations. Clin Pharmacokinet 2002:41:115-35.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Filler G, Feber J. Lepage N, Weiler G, Mai I. Universal approach to pharmacokinetic monitoring of immunosuppressive agents in children. Pediatr Transplant 2002;6:411-8   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Webb NJA, Stevenson PJ, Lewis MA, Postiethwaite RJ, Bradbury MG, Undre NA. Pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in pediatric renal transplant recipients. Transplant Proc 2002;34:1948-1950   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Sarwal MM, Vidhun J, Alexander SR, Satterwhite T, MilIan M, Salvatierra O Jr. Continued superior outcomes with modification and lengthened follow-up of a steroid-avoidance pilot with extended daclizumab induction in pediatric renal transplantation. Transplantation 2003;76:1331-9   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Maiorca R, Cristinelli L, Brunori G, Setti G, Salemi B, De Nobili U, et al. Prospective controlled trial of steroid withdrawal after six months in renal transplant patients treated with cyclosporin. Transplant Proc 1988;20(suppl 3):121-5
13 Cooney GF, Habucky K, Hoppu K. Cyclosporine pharmacokinetics in pediatric transplant recipients. Clin Pharmacokinet 1997;32:481-95   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Feld LG, Stablein D, Fivush B, Harmon W, Tejani A. Renal transplantation in children from 1987-1996: The 1996 annual report of the North American Pediatric Renal Transplant Cooperative Study. Pediatr Transplant 1997;1:146-62
15 Halloran PF. Molecular mechanisms of new immunosuppressants. Clin Transplant 1996;10:118-23
16 NARPTCS. 2002 Annual Report of the North American Pediatric Renal Transplant Cooperative Study(NAPRTCS). 2002, Section 3
17 Peters DH, Fitton A, Plosker GL, Faulds D. Tacrolimus. A review of its pharmacology and therapeutic potential in hepatic and renal transplantation. Drugs 1993:46:746-94   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Hoyer PF. Cvclosporin A(Neorai) in pediatric organ transplantation. Pediatr Transplant 1998;2:35-9
19 Shishido S, Asanuma H, Tajima E, Honda M, Nakai H. Pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in pediatric renal transplant recipients. Transplant Proc 2001;33:1066-8   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Barama A. Sepandj F, Gough J. Mckenna R. Correlation between neoral 2 hours post-dose levels and histologic findings on surveillance biopsies. Transplant Proc 2004;36(2 suppl):465S-467S
21 Keown P, Kahan BD, Johnston A, Levy G, Dunn SP, Cittero F, et al. Optimization of cyclosporine therapy with new therapeutic drug monitoring strategies: report from the international Neoral TDM Advisory Consensus Meeting (Vancouver, November 1997). Transplant Proc 1998;30: 1645-9   DOI
22 Johnston A, David OJ, Cooney GF. Pharmacokinetic validation of neoral absorption profiling. Transplant Proc 2000;2 (suppl 3A):53S-56S
23 Shaw LM, Holt DW, Keown P, Venkataramanan R, Yatscoff RW. Current opinions on therapeutic drug monitoring of immunosuppressive drugs. Clin Ther 1999;21:1632-52   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Staatz CE, Willis C, Taylor PJ, Tett SE. Population pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in adult kidney transplant recipients. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2002;72:660-9   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Tonshoff B, Mehls O. Factors affecting growth and strategies for treatment in children after renal transplantation. Pediatr Transplant 1997;1 :176-82
26 Ellis D, Shapiro R, Jordan ML, Scantlebury VP, Gilboa N, Hopp L, et al. Comparison of FK -506 and cyclosporine regimens in pediatric renal transplantation. Pediatr Nephrol 1994;8:193-200   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Kim JS, Aviles DH, Silverstein DM, LeBlanc PL, Vehas kari VM. Effect of age, ethnicity, and glucocorticoid use on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in pediatric renal transplant patients. Pediatr Transplant 2005(in press)
28 Hoyer PF, Boekenkamp A, Vester U, Offner G, Brodehl J. Conversion from Sandimmune to Neoral and induction therapy with Neoral in pediatric renal transplant recipients. Transplant Proc 1996;28:2259-61
29 Dunn TB, Asolati M, Holman DM, Raofi V, Jovanovic B, Pollak R, et al. Long-term outcomes of a prospective trial of steroid withdrawal after kidney transplantation. Surgery 1999;125:155-9   DOI   ScienceOn
30 Belitsky P, Levy GA, Johnston A, Levy G. Impact of absorption profiling on efficacy and safety of cyclosporine therapy in transplant recipients. Clin Pharmacokinet 2000; 39:117-25   DOI   ScienceOn