Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4196/kjpp.2016.20.1.119

Comparison of electrophysiological effects of calcium channel blockers on cardiac repolarization  

Lee, Hyang-Ae (Next-generation Pharmaceutical Research Center, Korea Institute of Toxicology)
Hyun, Sung-Ae (Next-generation Pharmaceutical Research Center, Korea Institute of Toxicology)
Park, Sung-Gurl (Next-generation Pharmaceutical Research Center, Korea Institute of Toxicology)
Kim, Ki-Suk (Next-generation Pharmaceutical Research Center, Korea Institute of Toxicology)
Kim, Sung Joon (Department of Physiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine)
Publication Information
The Korean Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology / v.20, no.1, 2016 , pp. 119-127 More about this Journal
Abstract
Dihydropyridine (DHP) calcium channel blockers (CCBs) have been widely used to treat of several cardiovascular diseases. An excessive shortening of action potential duration (APD) due to the reduction of $Ca^{2+}$ channel current ($I_{Ca}$) might increase the risk of arrhythmia. In this study we investigated the electrophysiological effects of nicardipine (NIC), isradipine (ISR), and amlodipine (AML) on the cardiac APD in rabbit Purkinje fibers, voltage-gated $K^+$ channel currents ($I_{Kr}$, $I_{Ks}$) and voltage-gated $Na^+$ channel current ($I_{Na}$). The concentration-dependent inhibition of $Ca^{2+}$ channel currents ($I_{Ca}$) was examined in rat cardiomyocytes; these CCBs have similar potency on $I_{Ca}$ channel blocking with $IC_{50}$ (the half-maximum inhibiting concentration) values of 0.142, 0.229, and 0.227 nM on NIC, ISR, and AML, respectively. However, ISR shortened both $APD_{50}$ and $APD_{90}$ already at $1{\mu}M$ whereas NIC and AML shortened $APD_{50}$ but not $APD_{90}$ up to $30{\mu}M$. According to ion channel studies, NIC and AML concentration-dependently inhibited $I_{Kr}$ and $I_{Ks}$ while ISR had only partial inhibitory effects (<50% at $30{\mu}M$). Inhibition of $I_{Na}$ was similarly observed in the three CCBs. Since the $I_{Kr}$ and $I_{Ks}$ mainly contribute to cardiac repolarization, their inhibition by NIC and AML could compensate for the AP shortening effects due to the block of $I_{Ca}$.
Keywords
Antihypertensives; Cardiac action potentials; Cardiac repolarization; Dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers; Ion channels;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Udelson JE, DeAbate CA, Berk M, Neuberg G, Packer M, Vijay NK, Gorwitt J, Smith WB, Kukin ML, LeJemtel T, Levine TB, Konstam MA. Effects of amlodipine on exercise tolerance, quality of life, and left ventricular function in patients with heart failure from left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Am Heart J. 2000;139:503-510.   DOI
2 Littler WA, Sheridan DJ. Placebo controlled trial of felodipine in patients with mild to moderate heart failure. UK Study Group. Br Heart J. 1995;73:428-433.   DOI
3 Li K, Zhang X, Yuan YS, Zhao FL. A high-performance liquid chromatographic method for the determination of nicardipine in plasma and its application to pharmacokinetics in humans. Biomed Chromatogr. 1998;12:326-329.   DOI
4 Christensen HR, Antonsen K, Simonsen K, Lindekaer A, Bonde J, Angelo HR, Kampmann JP. Bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of isradipine after oral and intravenous administration: half-life shorter than expected? Pharmacol Toxicol. 2000;86:178-182.   DOI
5 Elliott HL, Meredith PA, Reid JL, Faulkner JK. A comparison of the disposition of single oral doses of amlodipine in young and elderly subjects. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1988;12 Suppl 7:S64-66.
6 van Zwieten PA, Pfaffendorf M. Similarities and differences between calcium antagonists: pharmacological aspects. J Hypertens Suppl. 1993;11:S3-11.
7 Schoffstall JM, Spivey WH, Gambone LM, Shaw RP, Sit SP. Effects of calcium channel blocker overdose-induced toxicity in the conscious dog. Ann Emerg Med. 1991;20:1104-1108.   DOI
8 Lee SR, Noh SJ, Pronto JR, Jeong YJ, Kim HK, Song IS, Xu Z, Kwon HY, Kang SC, Sohn EH, Ko KS, Rhee BD, Kim N, Han J. The critical roles of zinc: beyond impact on myocardial signaling. Korean J Physiol Pharmacol. 2015;19:389-399.   DOI
9 Yun J, Bae H, Choi SE, Kim JH, Choi YW, Lim I, Lee CS, Lee MW, Ko JH, Seo SJ, Bang H. Taxifolin Glycoside Blocks Human ether-a-go-go Related Gene $K^+$ Channels. Korean J Physiol Pharmacol. 2013;17:37-42.   DOI
10 Dahlof B, Sever PS, Poulter NR, Wedel H, Beevers DG, Caulfield M, Collins R, Kjeldsen SE, Kristinsson A, McInnes GT, Mehlsen J, Nieminen M, O'Brien E, Ostergren J; ASCOT Investigators. Prevention of cardiovascular events with an antihypertensive regimen of amlodipine adding perindopril as required versus atenolol adding bendroflumethiazide as required, in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial-Blood Pressure Lowering Arm (ASCOT-BPLA): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;366:895-906.   DOI
11 Siragy HM. Major outcomes in high-risk hypertensive patients randomized to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or calcium channel blocker vs diuretic. The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT). Curr Hypertens Rep. 2003;5:293-294.   DOI
12 Black HR, Elliott WJ, Grandits G, Grambsch P, Lucente T, White WB, Neaton JD, Grimm RH Jr, Hansson L, Lacourciere Y, Muller J, Sleight P, Weber MA, Williams G, Wittes J, Zanchetti A, Anders RJ; CONVINCE Research Group. Principal results of the Controlled Onset Verapamil Investigation of Cardiovascular End Points (CONVINCE) trial. JAMA. 2003;289:2073-2082.   DOI
13 DeWitt CR, Waksman JC. Pharmacology, pathophysiology and management of calcium channel blocker and beta-blocker toxicity. Toxicol Rev. 2004;23:223-238.   DOI
14 Pepine CJ, Handberg EM, Cooper-DeHoff RM, Marks RG, Kowey P, Messerli FH, Mancia G, Cangiano JL, Garcia-Barreto D, Keltai M, Erdine S, Bristol HA, Kolb HR, Bakris GL, Cohen JD, Parmley WW; INVEST Investigators. A calcium antagonist vs a non-calcium antagonist hypertension treatment strategy for patients with coronary artery disease. The International Verapamil-Trandolapril Study (INVEST): a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2003;290:2805-2816.   DOI
15 Burnier M, Pruijm M, Wuerzner G. Treatment of essential hypertension with calcium channel blockers: what is the place of lercanidipine? Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2009;5:981-987.   DOI
16 Hirano Y, Hiraoka M. Electrophysiology of cardiac ion channels. Nihon Rinsho. 1996;54:2050-2055.
17 Priest BT, Bell IM, Garcia ML. Role of hERG potassium channel assays in drug development. Channels (Austin). 2008;2:87-93.   DOI
18 Barhanin J, Attali B, Lazdunski M. IKs, a slow and intriguing cardiac $K^+$ channel and its associated long QT diseases. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 1998;8:207-214.   DOI
19 Haverkamp W, Breithardt G, Camm AJ, Janse MJ, Rosen MR, Antzelevitch C, Escande D, Franz M, Malik M, Moss A, Shah R. The potential for QT prolongation and proarrhythmia by nonantiarrhythmic drugs: clinical and regulatory implications. Report on a policy conference of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2000;21:1216-1231.   DOI
20 Cubeddu LX. QT prolongation and fatal arrhythmias: a review of clinical implications and effects of drugs. Am J Ther. 2003;10:452-457.   DOI
21 Hondeghem LM. Thorough QT/QTc not so thorough: removes torsadogenic predictors from the T-wave, incriminates safe drugs, and misses profibrillatory drugs. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2006;17:337-340.   DOI
22 Gaita F, Giustetto C, Bianchi F, Wolpert C, Schimpf R, Riccardi R, Grossi S, Richiardi E, Borggrefe M. Short QT Syndrome: a familial cause of sudden death. Circulation. 2003;108:965-970.   DOI
23 Giustetto C, Di Monte F, Wolpert C, Borggrefe M, Schimpf R, Sbragia P, Leone G, Maury P, Anttonen O, Haissaguerre M, Gaita F. Short QT syndrome: clinical findings and diagnostic-therapeutic implications. Eur Heart J. 2006;27:2440-2447.   DOI
24 Extramiana F, Antzelevitch C. Amplified transmural dispersion of repolarization as the basis for arrhythmogenesis in a canine ventricular-wedge model of short-QT syndrome. Circulation. 2004;110:3661-3666.   DOI
25 Garberoglio L, Giustetto C, Wolpert C, Gaita F. Is acquired short QT due to digitalis intoxication responsible for malignant ventricular arrhythmias? J Electrocardiol. 2007;40:43-46.   DOI
26 Lu HR, Vlaminckx E, Hermans AN, Rohrbacher J, Van Ammel K, Towart R, Pugsley M, Gallacher DJ. Predicting drug-induced changes in QT interval and arrhythmias: QT-shortening drugs point to gaps in the ICHS7B Guidelines. Br J Pharmacol. 2008;154:1427-1438.   DOI
27 Aubert M, Osterwalder R, Wagner B, Parrilla I, Cavero I, Doessegger L, Ertel EA. Evaluation of the rabbit Purkinje fibre assay as an in vitro tool for assessing the risk of drug-induced torsades de pointes in humans. Drug Saf. 2006;29:237-254.   DOI
28 Food and Drug Administration, HHS. International Conference on Harmonisation; guidance on S7B Nonclinical Evaluation of the Potential for Delayed Ventricular Repolarization (QT Interval Prolongation) by Human Pharmaceuticals; availability. Notice. Fed Regist. 2005;70:61133-61134.
29 D'Alonzo AJ, Zhu JL, Darbenzio RB, Dorso CR, Grover GJ. Proarrhythmic effects of pinacidil are partially mediated through enhancement of catecholamine release in isolated perfused guineapig hearts. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1998;30:415-423.   DOI
30 D'Alonzo AJ, Hess TA, Darbenzio RB, Sewter JC, Conder ML, McCullough JR. Effects of cromakalim or pinacidil on pacing- and ischemia-induced ventricular fibrillation in the anesthetized pig. Basic Res Cardiol. 1994;89:163-176.
31 Extramiana F, Antzelevitch C. Amplified transmural dispersion of repolarization as the basis for arrhythmogenesis in a canine ventricular-wedge model of short-QT syndrome. Circulation. 2004;110:3661-3666.   DOI
32 Hondeghem LM. Thorough QT/QTc not so thorough: removes torsadogenic predictors from the T-wave, incriminates safe drugs, and misses profibrillatory drugs. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2006;17:337-340.   DOI
33 Garberoglio L, Giustetto C, Wolpert C, Gaita F. Is acquired short QT due to digitalis intoxication responsible for malignant ventricular arrhythmias? J Electrocardiol. 2007;40:43-46.   DOI
34 Roden DM. Drug-induced prolongation of the QT interval. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:1013-1022.   DOI
35 Hondeghem LM, Carlsson L, Duker G. Instability and triangulation of the action potential predict serious proarrhythmia, but action potential duration prolongation is antiarrhythmic. Circulation. 2001;103:2004-2013.   DOI
36 Hondeghem LM. QT and TdP. QT: an unreliable predictor of proarrhythmia. Acta Cardiol. 2008;63:1-7.   DOI
37 Guo D, Zhao X, Wu Y, Liu T, Kowey PR, Yan GX. L-type calcium current reactivation contributes to arrhythmogenesis associated with action potential triangulation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2007;18:196-203.   DOI
38 Milberg P, Eckardt L, Bruns HJ, Biertz J, Ramtin S, Reinsch N, Fleischer D, Kirchhof P, Fabritz L, Breithardt G, Haverkamp W. Divergent proarrhythmic potential of macrolide antibiotics despite similar QT prolongation: fast phase 3 repolarization prevents early afterdepolarizations and torsade de pointes. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2002;303:218-225.   DOI
39 Lu HR, Vlaminckx E, Van Ammel K, De Clerck F. Drug-induced long QT in isolated rabbit Purkinje fibers: importance of action potential duration, triangulation and early afterdepolarizations. Eur J Pharmacol. 2002;452:183-192.   DOI
40 Champeroux P, Viaud K, El Amrani AI, Fowler JS, Martel E, Le Guennec JY, Richard S. Prediction of the risk of Torsade de Pointes using the model of isolated canine Purkinje fibres. Br J Pharmacol. 2005;144:376-385.   DOI
41 Packer M, O'Connor CM, Ghali JK, Pressler ML, Carson PE, Belkin RN, Miller AB, Neuberg GW, Frid D, Wertheimer JH, Cropp AB, DeMets DL. Effect of amlodipine on morbidity and mortality in severe chronic heart failure. Prospective Randomized Amlodipine Survival Evaluation Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:1107-1114.   DOI
42 O'Connor CM, Carson PE, Miller AB, Pressler ML, Belkin RN, Neuberg GW, Frid DJ, Cropp AB, Anderson S, Wertheimer JH, DeMets DL. Effect of amlodipine on mode of death among patients with advanced heart failure in the PRAISE trial. Prospective Randomized Amlodipine Survival Evaluation. Am J Cardiol. 1998;82:881-887.   DOI