Browse > Article

Variation on Estimated Values of Radioactivity Concentration According to the Change of the Acquisition Time of SPECT/CT  

Kim, Ji-Hyeon (Department of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul Medical Center)
Lee, Jooyoung (Department of Radiological Technology, Songho College)
Son, Hyeon-Soo (Department of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul Medical Center)
Park, Hoon-Hee (Department of Radiological Technology, Shingu College)
Publication Information
The Korean Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology / v.25, no.2, 2021 , pp. 15-24 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose SPECT/CT was noted for its excellent correction method and qualitative functions based on fusion images in the early stages of dissemination, and interest in and utilization of quantitative functions has been increasing with the recent introduction of companion diagnostic therapy(Theranostics). Unlike PET/CT, various conditions like the type of collimator and detector rotation are a challenging factor for image acquisition and reconstruction methods at absolute quantification of SPECT/CT. Therefore, in this study, We want to find out the effect on the radioactivity concentration estimate by the increase or decrease of the total acquisition time according to the number of projections and the acquisition time per projection among SPECT/CT imaging conditions. Materials and Methods After filling the 9,293 ml cylindrical phantom with sterile water and diluting 99mTc 91.76 MBq, the standard image was taken with a total acquisition time of 600 sec (10 sec/frame × 120 frames, matrix size 128 × 128) and also volume sensitivity and the calibration factor was verified. Based on the standard image, the comparative images were obtained by increasing or decreasing the total acquisition time. namely 60 (-90%), 150 (-75%), 300 (-50%), 450 (-25%), 900 (+50%), and 1200 (+100%) sec. For each image detail, the acquisition time(sec/frame) per projection was set to 1.0, 2.5, 5.0, 7.5, 15.0 and 20.0 sec (fixed number of projections: 120 frame) and the number of projection images was set to 12, 30, 60, 90, 180 and 240 frames(fixed time per projection:10 sec). Based on the coefficients measured through the volume of interest in each acquired image, the percentage of variation about the contrast to noise ratio (CNR) was determined as a qualitative assessment, and the quantitative assessment was conducted through the percentage of variation of the radioactivity concentration estimate. At this time, the relationship between the radioactivity concentration estimate (cps/ml) and the actual radioactivity concentration (Bq/ml) was compared and analyzed using the recovery coefficient (RC_Recovery Coefficients) as an indicator. Results The results [CNR, radioactivity Concentration, RC] by the change in the number of projections for each increase or decrease rate (-90%, -75%, -50%, -25%, +50%, +100%) of total acquisition time are as follows. [-89.5%, +3.90%, 1.04] at -90%, [-77.9%, +2.71%, 1.03] at -75%, [-55.6%, +1.85%, 1.02] at -50%, [-33.6%, +1.37%, 1.01] at -25%, [-33.7%, +0.71%, 1.01] at +50%, [+93.2%, +0.32%, 1.00] at +100%. and also The results [CNR, radioactivity Concentration, RC] by the acquisition time change for each increase or decrease rate (-90%, -75%, -50%, -25%, +50%, +100%) of total acquisition time are as follows. [-89.3%, -3.55%, 0.96] at - 90%, [-73.4%, -0.17%, 1.00] at -75%, [-49.6%, -0.34%, 1.00] at -50%, [-24.9%, 0.03%, 1.00] at -25%, [+49.3%, -0.04%, 1.00] at +50%, [+99.0%, +0.11%, 1.00] at +100%. Conclusion In SPECT/CT, the total coefficient obtained according to the increase or decrease of the total acquisition time and the resulting image quality (CNR) showed a pattern that changed proportionally. On the other hand, quantitative evaluations through absolute quantification showed a change of less than 5% (-3.55 to +3.90%) under all experimental conditions, maintaining quantitative accuracy (RC 0.96 to 1.04). Considering the reduction of the total acquisition time rather than the increasing of the image acquiring time, The reduction in total acquisition time is applicable to quantitative analysis without significant loss and is judged to be clinically effective. This study shows that when increasing or decreasing of total acquisition time, changes in acquisition time per projection have fewer fluctuations that occur in qualitative and quantitative condition changes than the change in the number of projections under the same scanning time conditions.
Keywords
SPECT/CT; Aquisition Time; Radioactivity Concentration;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Arda K, Joseph AO, Richard LW, Michael MG, van Abbeele AD. Theranostics: The Role of Quantitative Nuclear. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2021 Jan;31(1):28-36   DOI
2 Bin H, Eric CF. Effects of shortened acquisition time on accuracy and precision of quantitative estimates of organ activity. Am Assoc Phys Med. 2010; 37(4):1807-1815
3 NEMA. Performance Measurements of Gamma Cameras. NEMA Standards Publication NU 1-2012. 2013;44-47
4 IAEA. Quantitative Nuclear Medicine Imaging: Concepts, Requirements and Methods. IAEA Human Health Reposrts No.9, 2014;9:36
5 Nakamura Y, Tomiguchi S, Katsuda N. Usefulness of the collimator detector response(CDR) recovery and the scatter correction by the effective scatter source estimation(ESSE) method in myocardial SPECT study. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 2010; 66(6):609-17.   DOI
6 Alfonso RM, Ole Marius HR, Jan DH, Svein-Erik M, Andreas A, Muyinatu A. LB, The Generalized Contrast-to-Noise Ratio: A Formal Definition for Lesion Detectability, IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2020 Apr;67(4):745-759   DOI
7 Marin I, Ryden T, Van Essen M, Svensson J, Gracheva N, Koster U, et al. Establishment of a clinical SPECT/CT protocol for imaging of 161Tb. EJNMMI Physics. 2020;7(45): 6-7   DOI
8 ICRP, Radiological Protection in Therapy with Radio-pharmaceuticals. ICRP Publication 140. 2018 Nov
9 Johannes Z, Alexander HV, Amos Y, Joachim H, Torsten K. Quantitative accuracy of clinical 99mTc SPECT/CT using ordered-subset expectation maximization with 3-dimensional resolution recovery, attenuation, and scatter correction. J Nucl Med. 2010; 51:921-928   DOI
10 김진구, 함준철, 오신현, 강천구, 김재삼. Dose calibrator 측정 깊이와 용량의 변화에 따른 선량값의 성향에 대한 고찰. 핵의학기술. 2020;24(1):20-26
11 Anil A, Jonathan R, Anthony S. P, Michael L. O. Improving Spatial Resolution Using Incoherent Subtraction of Receive Beams Having Different Apodizations. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2019 Jan;66(1):5-17.   DOI
12 이재영, 이을규, 김기원, 정회원, 유광열, 박훈희 외 2명. Breast PET CT 영상 재구성 변화에 따른 대조도 대 잡음비와 신호 대 잡음비의 비교평가. 방사선기술과학. 2017;40(1):79-85
13 NIH Health & Human Services. Help Me Understand Genetics 'Precision Medicine'. U.S.National Library of Medicine 'MedlinePlus' Web site. Available at:https://medlineplus.gov/download/genetics/understanding/precisionmedicine.pdf.