Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.2013.46.1.50

Socioeconomic Status and Number of Children Among Korean Women: The Healthy Twin Study  

Kim, Jinseob (Preventive Medicine Program, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University)
Sung, Joohon (Preventive Medicine Program, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University)
Publication Information
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health / v.46, no.1, 2013 , pp. 50-60 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate whether the birth rate is associated with socioeconomic status in the women of the Republic of Korea, where the birth rate is rapidly decreasing. Methods: This study included 732 females from the Healthy Twin Study, a family-twin cohort. The participants were classified into 3 socioeconomic groups according to their average income, education, and occupation. The association between socioeconomic status and number of children was assessed using gamma regression analysis with a generalized linear mixed model, adjusting for the age group, smoking/alcohol status, and family relationships. Results: The group with the highest education level had significantly fewer children compared with the group with the lowest education level (p=0.004). However, no significant associations were found according to household income level. The non-manual labor group had significantly fewer children compared with those working as homemakers (p=0.008). Conclusions: This study aimed to explain the causal relationship between socioeconomic status and number of children. Associations between some socioeconomic status and number of children were found in Korea.
Keywords
Fertility; Family; Social class;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Becker GS, Duesenberry JS, Okun B. An economic analysis of fertility. In: Universities-National Bureau. Demographic and economic change in developed countries. Cambridge: UMI; 1960, p. 209-240.
2 Heckman JJ, Willis RJ. Estimation of a stochastic model of reproduction an econometnc approach. In: Terleckyj NE, editor. Household production and consumption. Cambridge: NBER; 1976, p. 99-146.
3 Becker GS, Lewis HG. Interaction between quantity and quality of children. In: Schultz TW, editor. Economics of the family: marriage, children, and human capital. Cambridge: UMI; 1974, p. 81-90.
4 Becker G, Tomes N. Child endowments, and the quantity and quality of children. J Polit Econ 1976;84(4):S143-S162.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Caudill SB, Mixon FG. Modeling household fertility decisions: estimation and testing of censored regression models for count data. Empir Econ 1995;20(2):183-196.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Gensler H. Welfare and the family size decision of low-income, two-parent families. Appl Econ Lett 1997;4(10):607-610.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Davis NJ. Childless and single-childed women in early twentieth- century America. J Fam Issues 1982;3(4):431-458.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Park KS, Kim YH. Patterns of Korean women's life course. Korean J Popul Stud 2003;26(2):63-90 (Korean).
9 Ewer PA, Crimmins-Gardner E. Income in the income and fertility relationship. J Marriage Fam 1978;40(2):291-299.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Lee SS. Studies of causes of low fertility and comprehensive measures. Seoul: Presidential Committee on Ageing Society and Population Policy; 2005, p. 135-148 (Korean).
11 Kwon TH, Kim DS. Understanding of the population. Seoul: Seoul National University Press; 1990, p. 195-199 (Korean).
12 Sung J, Cho SI, Song YM, Lee K, Choi EY, Ha M, et al. Do we need more twin studies? The Healthy Twin Study, Korea. Int J Epidemiol 2006;35(2):488-490.   DOI
13 Augood C, Duckitt K, Templeton AA. Smoking and female infertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod 1998;13(6):1532-1539.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Hakim RB, Gray RH, Zacur H. Alcohol and caffeine consumption and decreased fertility. Fertil Steril 1998;70(4):632-637.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Sung J, Cho SI, Lee K, Ha M, Choi EY, Choi JS, et al. Healthy Twin: a twin-family study of Korea: protocols and current status. Twin Res Hum Genet 2006;9(6):844-848.   DOI
16 Kim HS. The economic and social implication of count regression models for married women's completed fertility in Korea. Korean J Popul Stud 2007;30(3):107-135 (Korean).
17 McCulloch CE. Generalized linear mixed models. Ohio: Institute of Mathematical Statistics; 2003, p. 28-33.
18 Melkersson M, Rooth DO. Modeling female fertility using inflated count data models. J Popul Econ 2000;13(2):189-203.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Li C, Cao W, Yu J, Ke T, Lu G, Yang Y, et al. An instrument for in situ measuring the volume scattering function of water: design, calibration and primary experiments. Sensors (Basel) 2012;12(4):4514-4533.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Nelder JA, Wedderburn RW. Generalized linear models. J R Stat Soc A 1972;135(3):370-384.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Kim HR. Socioeconomic health inequalities and counter policies in Korea. Seoul: Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs; 2004, p. 49-56 (Korean).
22 Statistics Korea. 2010 Birth statistics (confirm); 2011 [cited 2013 Jan 16]. Available from: http://kosis.kr/abroad/abroad_ 01List.jsp (Korean).
23 Ahn JY. Long-term demand forecast (2005-2020). Mon Labor Rev 2005;(6):3-23 (Korean).
24 Curtis KM, Savitz DA, Arbuckle TE. Effects of cigarette smoking, caffeine consumption, and alcohol intake on fecundability. Am J Epidemiol 1997;146(1):32-41.   DOI   ScienceOn