Browse > Article

Analysis of Repeated Measured VAS in a Clinical Trial for Evaluating a New NSAID with GEE Method  

Lim, Hoi-Jeong (Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University, Institute of Radiation Effect & Epidemiology, Medical Research Center, Seoul National University)
Kim, Yoon-I (Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University)
Jung, Young-Bok (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chung-Ang University)
Seong, Sang-Cheol (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul National University)
Ahn, Jin-Hwan (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sungkyunkwan University and Samsung Medical Center)
Roh, Kwon-Jae (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ewha Woman's University Hospital)
Kim, Jung-Man (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Catholic University of Korea)
Park, Byung-Joo (Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University, Institute of Radiation Effect & Epidemiology, Medical Research Center, Seoul National University, Clinical Trial Center, Clinical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital)
Publication Information
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health / v.37, no.4, 2004 , pp. 381-389 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objective : To compare the efficacy between SKI306X and Diclofenac by using generalized estimating equations (GEE) methodology in the analysis of correlated bivariate binary outcome data in Osteoarthritis (OA) diseases. Methods : A randomized, double-blind, active comparator-controlled, non-inferiority clinical trial was conducted at 5 institutions in Korea with the random assignment of 248 patients aged 35 to 75 years old with OA of the knee and clinical evidence of OA. Patients were enrolled in this study if they had at least moderate pain in the affected knee joint and a score larger than 35mm as assessed by VAS (Visual Analog Scale). The main exposure variable was treatment (SKI 306X vs. Diclofenac) and other covariates were age, sex, BMI, baseline VAS, center, operation history (Yes/No), NSAIDS (Y/N), acupuncture (Y/N), herbal medicine (Y/N), past history of musculoskeletal disease (Y/N), and previous therapy related with OA (Y/N). The main study outcome was the change of VAS pain scores from baseline to the 2nd and 4th weeks after treatment. Pain scores were obtained as baseline, 2nd and 4th weeks after treatment. We applied GEE approach with empirical covariance matrix and independent(or exchangeable) working correlation matrix to evaluate the relation of several risk factors to the change of VAS pain scores with correlated binary bivariate outcomes. Results : While baseline VAS, age, and acupuncture variables had protective effects for reducing the OA pain, its treatment (Joins/Diclofenac) was not statistically significant through GEE methodology (ITT:aOR=1.37, 95% CI=(0.8200, 2.26), PP:aOR=1.47, 95% CI=(0.73, 2.95)). The goodness-of-fit statistic for GEE (6.55, p=0.68) was computed to assess the adequacy of the fitted final model. Conclusions : Both ANCOVA and GEE methods yielded non statistical significance in the evaluation of non-inferiority of the efficacy between SKI306X and Diclofenac. While VAS outcome for each visit was applied in GEE, only VAS outcome for the fourth visit was applied in ANCOVA. So the GEE methodology is more accurate for the analysis of correlated outcomes.
Keywords
VAS pain score; GEE; Goodness-of-fit test for GEE; Osteoarthritis; Clinical Trial;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 aston JF, Gustafasson M, Rheumatoid arthritis: determination of pain characteristics and comparison of RAJ and VAS in its measurement. Pain 1990; 41: 35-40   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Zhang Y, Glynn RJ, Fekson DT. Misculoskeletal disease research: should we analyze the joint or the person? J Rheumatol 1996; 23: 1130-1134   PUBMED
3 Mickey J, Greenland S. A study of the impact of confounder-selection criteria on effect estimation. Am J Epidemiol 1989; 129: 125-137   DOI
4 Zeger SL, Liang KY. Longitudinal data analysis for dicrete and continuous outcomes. Biometrics 1986; 42: 121-130   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Heimendinger J, Feng Z, Emmons K, Stoddard A, Kinne S, Biener L, Sorensen G, Abrams D, Varnes J, Boutwell B. The working well trial: baseline dietary and smoking behaviors of employees and related worksite characteristics. The working well research group, Prev Med 1995;24: 180-193   DOI   ScienceOn
6 SAS/STAT User' s Guide, Versoion 8, Cary, NC, USA: SAS Instiute lnc.; 1999
7 Koo HW, Kwark M, Lee Y, Park BJ. Comparison of Efficiency between Individual Randomization and Ouster Randomization in the Field Trial. Korean J Prev Med 2000; 33(1):51-55
8 Bendel RB, Afifi AA. Comparison of stopping rules in forward regression. JASA 1977; 72: 4653
9 Jung YB, Seong SC, Lee MC et al. A four-week, randomized, double-blind trial of the efficacy and safety of SKI306X, a herbal anti-arthritic agent versus diclofenac in osteoarhritis of the knee. Clinical Trial Report of SK Pharm 2000; M-74I(Korean)
10 Shin DY, Park TS, A Study on the Use of Working Correlation Matrices in the GEE Approach to the Analysis of Repeated Binary Data, Appl Statistic 1996; M: 15-27 (Korean)
11 Liang KY, Zeger S1. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 1986; 73: 13-22   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Horton NJ, Bebchuk JD, Jones CL et al. Goodness-of-fit for GEE: An example with mental health service utilization. Statist Med 1999; 18: 213-222   DOI   ScienceOn