Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2016.195

An overview of meta-analysis for clinicians  

Lee, Young Ho (Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Medical Center)
Publication Information
The Korean journal of internal medicine / v.33, no.2, 2018 , pp. 277-283 More about this Journal
Abstract
The number of medical studies being published is increasing exponentially, and clinicians must routinely process large amounts of new information. Moreover, the results of individual studies are often insufficient to provide confident answers, as their results are not consistently reproducible. A meta-analysis is a statistical method for combining the results of different studies on the same topic and it may resolve conflicts among studies. Meta-analysis is being used increasingly and plays an important role in medical research. This review introduces the basic concepts, steps, advantages, and caveats of meta-analysis, to help clinicians understand it in clinical practice and research. A major advantage of a meta-analysis is that it produces a precise estimate of the effect size, with considerably increased statistical power, which is important when the power of the primary study is limited because of a small sample size. A meta-analysis may yield conclusive results when individual studies are inconclusive. Furthermore, meta-analyses investigate the source of variation and different effects among subgroups. In summary, a meta-analysis is an objective, quantitative method that provides less biased estimates on a specific topic. Understanding how to conduct a meta-analysis aids clinicians in the process of making clinical decisions.
Keywords
Meta-analysis; Statistical analysis; Advantage; Limitation;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Lee YH, Bae SC, Song GG. Gene-environmental interaction between smoking and shared epitope on the development of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies in rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analysis. Int J Rheum Dis 2014;17:528-535.
2 Song G, Bae SC, Lee YH. Diagnostic accuracy of lung ultrasound for interstitial lung disease in patients with connective tissue diseases: a meta-analysis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2016;34:11-16.
3 Song GG, Seo YH, Kim JH, Choi SJ, Ji JD, Lee YH. Association between TNF-${\alpha}$ (-308 A/G, -238 A/G, -857 C/T) polymorphisms and responsiveness to TNF-${\alpha}$ blockers in spondyloarthropathy, psoriasis and Crohn's disease: a meta-analysis. Pharmacogenomics 2015;16:1427-1437.   DOI
4 Lee YH, Nath SK. Systemic lupus erythematosus susceptibility loci defined by genome scan meta-analysis. Hum Genet 2005;118:434-443.   DOI
5 Murad MH, Montori VM, Ioannidis JP, et al. How to read a systematic review and meta-analysis and apply the results to patient care: users' guides to the medical literature. JAMA 2014;312:171-179.   DOI
6 Button KS, Ioannidis JP, Mokrysz C, et al. Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nat Rev Neurosci 2013;14:365-376.   DOI
7 Haidich AB. Meta-analysis in medical research. Hippokratia 2010;14(Suppl 1):29-37.
8 Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. 1996. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007;455:3-5.
9 Glass GV. Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educ Res 1976;5:3-8.
10 Guyatt GH, Sackett DL, Sinclair JC, Hayward R, Cook DJ, Cook RJ. Users' guides to the medical literature. IX. A method for grading health care recommendations. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 1995;274:1800-1804.   DOI
11 Walker E, Hernandez AV, Kattan MW. Meta-analysis: Its strengths and limitations. Cleve Clin J Med 2008;75:431-439.   DOI
12 Egger M, Smith GD, Phillips AN. Meta-analysis: principles and procedures. BMJ 1997;315:1533-1537.   DOI
13 Gotzsche PC. Why we need a broad perspective on metaanalysis. It may be crucially important for patients. BMJ 2000;321:585-586.   DOI
14 Leenaars M, Hooijmans CR, van Veggel N, et al. A step-bystep guide to systematically identify all relevant animal studies. Lab Anim 2012;46:24-31.   DOI
15 Qi X, Yang M, Ren W, et al. Find duplicates among the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library Databases in systematic review. PLoS One 2013;8:e71838.   DOI
16 Whitehead A, Whitehead J. A general parametric approach to the meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Stat Med 1991;10:1665-1677.   DOI
17 Munafo MR, Flint J. Meta-analysis of genetic association studies. Trends Genet 2004;20:439-444.   DOI
18 Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 2002;21:1539-1558.   DOI
19 Thakkinstian A, McElduff P, D’Este C, Duffy D, Attia J. A method for meta-analysis of molecular association studies. Stat Med 2005;24:1291-1306.   DOI
20 Davey Smith G, Egger M. Meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. Lancet 1997;350:1182.
21 Copas J, Shi JQ. Meta-analysis, funnel plots and sensitivity analysis. Biostatistics 2000;1:247-262.   DOI
22 DerSimonian R, Kacker R. Random-effects model for meta-analysis of clinical trials: an update. Contemp Clin Trials 2007;28:105-114.   DOI
23 Hedges LV, Vevea JL. Fixed- and random-effects models in meta-analysis. Psychol Methods 1998;3:486-504.   DOI
24 Ried K. Interpreting and understanding meta-analysis graphs: a practical guide. Aust Fam Physician 2006;35:635-638.
25 Zintzaras E, Lau J. Synthesis of genetic association studies for pertinent gene-disease associations requires appropriate methodological and statistical approaches. J Clin Epidemiol 2008;61:634-645.   DOI
26 Salanti G, Sanderson S, Higgins JP. Obstacles and opportunities in meta-analysis of genetic association studies. Genet Med 2005;7:13-20.   DOI
27 Thompson SG, Higgins JP. How should meta-regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted? Stat Med 2002;21:1559-1573.   DOI
28 Dickersin K, Min YI. Publication bias: the problem that won't go away. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1993;703:135-146.   DOI
29 Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997;315:629-634.   DOI
30 Sterne JA, Egger M. Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis: guidelines on choice of axis. J Clin Epidemiol 2001;54:1046-1055.   DOI
31 Lau J, Ioannidis JP, Terrin N, Schmid CH, Olkin I. The case of the misleading funnel plot. BMJ 2006;333:597-600.   DOI
32 Duval S, Tweedie R. Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plotbased method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics 2000;56:455-463.   DOI
33 Lee YH. Meta-analysis of genetic association studies. Ann Lab Med 2015;35:283-287.   DOI
34 Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 2009;151:264-269.   DOI
35 Bailar JC 3rd. The promise and problems of meta-analysis. N Engl J Med 1997;337:559-561.   DOI
36 Sharpe D. Of apples and oranges, file drawers and garbage: why validity issues in meta-analysis will not go away. Clin Psychol Rev 1997;17:881-901.   DOI
37 Changelian PS, Flanagan ME, Ball DJ, et al. Prevention of organ allograft rejection by a specific Janus kinase 3 inhibitor. Science 2003;302:875-878.   DOI
38 Song GG, Bae SC, Lee YH. Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib for active rheumatoid arthritis with an inadequate response to methotrexate or disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Korean J Intern Med 2014;29:656-663.   DOI