Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3744/SNAK.2016.53.4.249

Study on Identifying the Key Factors for the Decision of Necessity for the Performance Improvement of Naval Ship  

Kil, Taejun (Defense Acquisition Program Administration)
Kwon, Pangum (Defense Acquisition Program Administration)
Publication Information
Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea / v.53, no.4, 2016 , pp. 249-257 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study is finding the key factors for navy to determine the necessity of naval ship PIP(Performance Improvement Program) against the altered battle field environment and politics. Recently, leading countries try to cope actively with the changing international circumstances and technology development trend in the commercial industry. In the case of domestic situation, based on the regulation, it is possible to modify the ship configurations by PIP, but there are not enough criteria and references to make a decision of necessity for the PIP program considering the naval ship acquisition planning by navy. It is necessary to acquire the obvious decision criteria for determination of PIP commencement, by the operational, political and security environment around the Korean peninsula. Considering these conditions, this study proposes the factors necessary for naval ship PIP for navy.
Keywords
Naval ship design; Modernization; Performance Improvement Program(PIP);
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Dean, A.R.,1984. Combatant ship design guidance through mission effectiveness analysis. Naval Engineers Journal, 96, pp.112-127   DOI
2 Dictionary of Military terminology, 2009. Dictionary of Military terminology. Navy: Gyeryong.
3 DTAQ, 2013, Study on policy and system integration for Naval ship Performance Improvement, Technical report. Gyeryong: Navy
4 Kwon, P.G, 2013, Study on the Development of Naval Ship Focused on the Enhancement of Combat Capability. The Journal of Korean Defense Industry Accociation, 414, pp.110-115.
5 Jang, Y.C, 2013. Study on the Performance Improvement Program Planning of Weapon System. The Journal of Joint Chief of Staff, 56, pp.114-118.
6 Jeon, T.B., 2013. Model of Reasonable Decision Making for Korean Weapon System Performance Improvement Program, National Defense Policy, 29, pp.89-117.
7 Jeong, Y.H., 2011. A study on Traceability Management using SWBS for a Naval ship Acquisition. Journal of System Engineering, 7, pp.31-37.
8 Jin, J.H, 2012. Research of warship's special performance management methodology based on systems engineering. Master thesis. Seoul National University.
9 Jung, J.H., 2006. The Review of Naval Survivability Design Technology and Technical Trend. Journal of the Society of Naval Architect, 43, pp.41-49.
10 Kim, G.H., 2013. Surface Naval Ship Modernization Trend for Combat Effectiveness Enhancement, Defense Science and Technology, 44, pp.27-45.
11 Kim, H.C., 2007. Study on future warfare characteristics. Master thesis, Han-nam university
12 Ministry of Defense (MND), 2014, Defense white paper. Seoul: MND.
13 Park, J.W. Shin, Y.G. & Lee, G.G., 2010. Study on PIDO establishment based by total ship engineering. KAOSTS Conference, Jeju, 3th, June, 887-898
14 Society of Naval Architect of Korea(SNAK), 2011. Study on establishment of ship special performance standard by type of naval ship, Technical report. SNAK: Seoul.
15 SNAK, 2015. Naval ship. SNAK: Seoul.
16 US Navy, 2012. Opnav Instruction 9070.1A Survivabilty Policy and Standards for Surface Ships and Craft of the U.S. US Navy: Washington.