Browse > Article

A Study on the Balanced Regional Development Strategy through Horizontal Fiscal Equalization Systems(I)  

Kim, Yong-Chang (Dept. of Geography, College of Social Sciences, Seoul National University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Geographical Society / v.43, no.4, 2008 , pp. 580-598 More about this Journal
Abstract
Focusing on 'growing together' strategies through horizontal fiscal equalization systems, this and subsequent papers aim to suggest regional co-development strategies in which conflicts between the Seoul Metropolitan Area(SMA) and the non-SMA can be efficiently alleviated. Regarding the socio-economic relationships between the SMA and the non-SMA, there are two contradictory perspectives. One perspective is that the SMA grows at the expense of the non-SMA. The other perspective is that non-SMA's economy is somehow entirely dependent on the economic activities occurring within the SMA, which is the opposite of the former perspective. There are various forms of collaboration among local or regional governments, but the most radical solutions involve the establishment of new regional development financing method at the practical level. This paper suggests that horizontal fiscal equalization not yet introduced between same level subgovernments need to be institutionalized to promote the growing together between the SMA and the rest region of Korea.
Keywords
horizontal fiscal equalization system; balanced regional development; Seoul Metropolitan Area policy; intergovernmental fiscal transfers; regional policy;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 국토연구원, 2006, 수도권 토지이용의 현황과 과제, 수도권 정책혁신 민관협의회 보고자료
2 김경환. 이창무. 김경아, 2005, 수도권 집중의 사회적 비 용. 편익추정의 검증, 경기개발연구원, 수원
3 김민훈, 2008, '독일 지방재정조정제도의 개혁에 관한 최 근 동향: 주간재정조정제도를 중심으로, ' 법학연구, 48(2), 85-117
4 김용창, 1994, '자본의 국제화와 거대도시의 재구조화 그 리고 서울, ' 공간과 사회, 4, 79-123
5 김헌민, 1993, '수도권 도시의 경제성장 분석: 도시산업개 발 정책방향의 모색,' 한국행정학보, 27(2), 317-351
6 박헌수. 정수연, 2004, 수도권 규제효과에 관한연구: 수도 권규제가 기업의 생산효율성에 미치는 영향을 중 심으로, 경기개발연구원, 수원
7 성진근. 안종운, 2005, '수도권 과밀화로 인한 지역간 사회 적 비용의 효과분석, ' 농업경제연구, 46(1), 1-15
8 日本財務省財務總合政策硏究所, 2006, 主要諸外國におけ る國と地方の財政役割の狀況, 東京
9 靑木宗明, 2007, 'フランスの地方財政調整：財源保障と財 政調整, 'http://www.clair.or.jp/j/forum/other/ pdf/ 43_9.pdf, 自治体國際化協會, 231-259
10 The Stationary Office, 2005, Pooling of Non-Domestic Rates and Redistribution to Local Authorities in England Accounts 2005-2006, National Audit Office Press Office, London, 1-14
11 Wilkinson, J., 2003, Horizontal Fiscal Equalisation, Briefing Paper No 21/03, NSW Parliamentary Library Research Service, 1-60
12 이규방, 2005, '수도권의 비전과 발전전략, '국가균형발전 정책 심포지움 자료집, 국가균형발전위원회, 144- 168
13 半谷俊彦, 2006, 'ドイツにおける財政調整制度の現狀につ いて, 'http://www.clair.or.jp/j/forum/other/pdf/ 33_6.pdf, 自治國体際化協會, 127-138
14 이영희, 1999, '외국 대도시의 재정조정제도, ' 지방재정, 18(5), 한국지방재정공제회, 60-72
15 日本財政制度等審議會, 2007, 財政制度分科會海外調査報 告書, 東京
16 ODPM(Office of the Deputy Prime Minister), 2003, Cities, Regions and Competitiveness, London
17 MFSALAR(Ministry of Finance and Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions), 2005. Local Government Financial Equalisation in Sweden, Stockholm
18 유재원, 2008, '묻지마 분권에 국가경쟁력 흔들, 강박적 균등주의로 제로섬 자초, ' 신동아, 51(2), 동아일보 사, 서울, 206-217
19 윤광재, 2002, '프랑스 지방재정조정제도 운용에 대한 연 구,' 한국지방자치학회보, 14(3), 193-210
20 정창무. 이춘근, 2004, '수도권 공간구조의 적정성 분석: 인구분포를 중심으로, ' 규제연구, 13(1), 101-130
21 The Stationary Office, 2006, The Local Government Finance Report 2006/2007, London
22 Leprince, M., Madies, T., and Paty, S., 2007, Business Tax Interactions among Local Governments: an Empirical Analysis of the French Case, Journal of Regional Science, 47(3), 603-621   DOI   ScienceOn
23 김현아, 2007, '지방세제의 중장기 발전방향, '지방세, 100, 한국지방재정공제회, 38-53
24 변창흠, 2007, '수도권 계획적 관리를 정책수단의 실효성 평가의 과제, ' 도시정보, 298, 22-34
25 Blochliger, H., Merk, O., Charbit, C., and Mizell, L., 2007, Fiscal Equalisation in OECD Countries, Working Paper, No. 4, OECD, Paris, 1-38
26 Wurzel, E., 2003, Consolidating Germany's Finances: Issues in Public Sector Spending Reform, Working Paper, No 366, OECD, Paris, 1-38
27 Bergvall, D., Charbit, C., Kraan, D., and Merk, O., 2006, Intergovernmental Transfers and Decentralised Public Spending, Working Papers, No. 3(2006), OECD, Paris, 1-36
28 Jamet, S., 2007, Meeting the Challenges of Decentralisation in France, Working Papers, No. 571, OECD, Paris, 1-29
29 Bird, R. M. and Tarasov, A. V., 2004, Closing the Gap: Fiscal Imbalances and Intergovernmental Transfers in Developed Federations, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 22, 77 -102   DOI
30 石田三成, 2006, 'フランスにおける國と地方の役割分擔, ' 主要諸外國における國と地方の財政役割の狀況, 日本財務省財務總合政策硏究所, 425-520
31 Dubois, E., Leprince, M., and Paty, S., 2007, The Effects of Politics on Local Tax Setting: Evidence from France, Urban Studies, 44(8), 1603-1618   DOI
32 OECD, 2007, OECD Territorial Reviews: Competitive Cities-A New Entrepreneurial Paradigm in Spatial Development, Paris
33 日本財務省財務總合政策硏究所, 2006, 'スウェ一デンに おける國と地方の役割分擔, '主要諸外國における 國と地方の財政役割の狀況, 東京, 797-862
34 Blochliger, H. and King, K., 2006, Fiscal Autonomy of Sub-central Governments, Working Paper No. 2(2006), OECD, Paris, 1-34
35 Schmidt S. and Buehler, R., 2007, The Planning Process in the US and Germany: A Comparative Analysis, International Planning Studies, 12(1), 55-75   DOI   ScienceOn
36 兼村高文, 2007, '英國/イングランド）の財政調整制度につ いて, 'http://www.clair.or.jp/j/forum/other/pdf/ 43_8.pdf, 自治体際化協會, 203-229
37 Greater London Authority, 2004, The Case for London: London's Loss is No-one Gain, The Mayor of London's Submission to Spending Review 2004, London
38 Shah, A., 1994, The Reform of Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations in Developing and Emerging Market Economies, Policy and Research Series No. 23, Washington D. C., World Bank
39 전영길, 2004, '수도권 규제완화정책에 따른 비수도권 지 역의 대응전략분석,' 한국지방자치학회보, 16(4), 91-113
40 日本財務省財務總合政策硏究所, 2001, 主要國の地方稅財 政制度:イギリス. ドイツ. フランス. アメリカ, 東京
41 Joumard, I. and Kongsrud, P. M., 2003, Fiscal Relations across Government Levels, Working Papers, No. 375, OECD, Paris, 1-61
42 Ormerod, P., Cook, W., Rosewell, B., and Volterra Consulting Ltd., 2006, Why Distance Doesn''t Die: Agglomeration and its Benefits, Working Paper 17, Greater London Authority, London, 1- 37
43 Scabrosetti, S., 2002, Tax Systems and Tax Reforms in Europe: France, Working Papers, No.186, Universita degli Studi di Pavia, 1-31
44 Martinez-Vazquez, J. and Boex, J., 2000, The Design of Equalization Grants: Theory and Applications, The World Bank Institute, Washington, D.C.
45 서순탁, 2006, '수도권 계획적 관리를 위한 시스템 구축방 향, ' 도시정보, 297, 14-26
46 민경휘. 김영수, 2003, 지역별 산업집적의 구조와 집적경 제 분석, 산업연구원, 서울
47 OECD, 2006, OECD Territorial Reviews: Competitive Cities in the Global Economy, Paris
48 Kearney. Foreign Policy, 2007, The Globalization Index 2007, http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/ cms.php?story_id=4030
49 윤광재, 2000, '프랑스에 있어서 균형적인 지역발전을 위 한 지방재정의 정책적 역할: 국가재정보조금을 중 심으로,' 한국정책학회보, 9(1), 317-341
50 Bird, R. M. and Smart, M., 2002, Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfers: International Lessons for Developing Countries, World Development, 30(6), 899-912   DOI   ScienceOn
51 Webb, R., 2007, Commonwealth General Purpose Financial Assistance to Local Government, Research Paper No. 9, Parliament of Australia, 1- 34
52 문병효, 2006, '독일의 재정조정시스템과 재정헌법의 개 혁, ' 외법논집, 22, 119-152
53 문남철, 2006, '수도권기업 지방이전 정책과 이전기업의 공간적 패턴, ' 지리학연구, 40(3), 353-366
54 허재완, 2003, '수도권산업입지 총량규제제도의 효과에 관 한 연구, ' 국토계획, 38(3), 221-231
55 Steffensen, J., 2005, Introduction to the Principles for Design of Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfer Systems: an International Comparison of Allocation Criteria, www.afdb.org/pls/portal/url/ ITEM/21909B5CF8DF1D93E040C00A0C3D2DCE, the African Development Bank Group, 1-49
56 강현수, 2007, '수도권과 지방의 상생을 위한 수도권 정책 방향, ' 공간과 사회, 27, 52-80
57 고영선, 2008, '성장능력 제고를 위한 재정정책방향, ' 2008-2012년 국가재정운용계획 세미나 자료집, KDI, 서울, 1-33
58 Searle, B., 2007, Revenue Sharing, Natural Resources and Fiscal Equalization, in Martinez-Vazquez, J and Searle, B. (eds.), Fiscal Equalization Challenges in the Design of Intergovernmental Transfers, Springer, New York, 371-401
59 이정훈. 문미성. 박헌수. 유영성. 조규영, 2004, 수도권 공장 신증설 규제의 합리적 개선방안 연구, 경기 도, 수원
60 이상대, 2006, '수도권 계획적 관리의 개념과 필요성(1), ' 도시정보, 296, 24-34
61 MEFI, 2005, French Taxation, Paris
62 Freret, S., 2005, Spatial Analysis of Horizontal Fiscal Interactions on Local Public Expenditures: the French Case, Seminaire d'Etudes et de Statistiques Appliquees a la Modelisation en Economie, XVemes Journees du SESAME, Universite de Rennes, 1-20
63 김의준, 1994, '수도권 지역경제 모형: 공공투자의 파급효 과 분석,' 한국지역개발학회지, 6(2), 57-72
64 栗原毅, 2005, '財政的自律を模索する地方財政: フランス 地方財政の現狀, 'PRI Discussion Paper Series No. 05A－07, 日本財務省財務總合政策硏究所
65 Assemblee Nationale, 2007, Avis presente au nom de la commission des lois constitutionnelles, de la legislation et de l'administration generale de la Republique sur le projet de loi de finances pour 2008$(n^{\circ}189)$, 1-58
66 김의준, 2003, '우리나라 지역불균형 문제의 이해와 지방 분산화 정책효과, '국가균형발전정책의 국민경제 적 효율성 세미나 발표문, 산업연구원 국가균형발 전연구센터, 서울
67 Bundesministerium der Justiz, 2005, Gesetz uber den Finanzausgleich zwischen Bund und Landern (Finanzausgleichsgesetz: FAG), http://www. gesetze-im-internet.de/bundesrecht/finausglg _2005 /gesamt.pd
68 Gill, I. and Kharas, H., 2007, An East Asian Renaissance: Ideas for Economic Growth, World Bank, Washington, D.C
69 OECD, 2005, Making the Fiscal System Sustainable and More Efficient, Economic Survey of France 2005, Paris, 43-94
70 김아영. 김의준, 2007, '수도권 및 인접지역의 제조업 생 산성 비교분석, ' 지역연구, 23(2), 53-83
71 서승환, 2001, '수도권의 총요소생산성 및 그 결정요인, ' 응용경제, 3(1), 133-160
72 Werner, J. and Shah, A., 2005, Fiscal Equalisation in Germany, http://info.worldbank.org/etools/ docs/library/241116/FiscalEqualisationInGerman y.pdf, 1-24