Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5573/ieie.2016.53.8.028

A Federation Policy Development Method for Generating Domestic ID Federation  

Wang, Gicheol (Aerospace ICT Research Department, Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute)
Publication Information
Journal of the Institute of Electronics and Information Engineers / v.53, no.8, 2016 , pp. 28-36 More about this Journal
Abstract
ID federation provides users various benefits such as employing multiple services with only single authentication and mitigating management burden of service providers that individually preserve account information of users. To keep up with this international trend, efforts for making the domestic ID federation is ongoing to provide users in the domestic research and education community seamless network connectivity and to support tetherless extension of research environment. In this paper, we analyze the foreign ID federation policies and compare them as a underlying work for making the domestic ID federation. Besides, we suggest some contents that should be included in the domestic ID federation policy. To activate the coming domestic ID federation, we need to first have a well-made federation policy. Then, we need to aggressively promote the domestic ID federation, develop various and fascinating services, and build a convenient support system for technology and service.
Keywords
SSO(Single Sign-On);
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 M. Vermezovic et al., "Identity Federation Policy template document," Ver. 0.3, Dec. 10, 2012.
2 Z. Yoash, Y. Brauch, and A. Aliper, "IIF(IUCC Identity Federation): Identity Federation Policy," Ver 1.2, Sep. 21, 2014.
3 S. Jaque and A. Lara, "COFRe: Comunidad Federada REUNA: Identity Federation Rules", Ver. 2.1, Oct. 10, 2013.
4 S. Jaque and A. Lara, "COFRe: Comunidad Federada REUNA: WebSSO Identity Provider Organizations Appendix", Ver 2.0, Dec. 17, 2012.
5 S. Jaque and A. Lara, "COFRe: Comunidad Federada REUNA: WebSSO Services Provider Appendix", Ver 2.0, Dec. 17, 2012.
6 D. Hernan and S. Garcia, "Columbian Federation of Identity for Research and Education (ColFIRE): Identity Federation Policy," Ver. 1.2, Aug. 29, 2014.
7 A. Martinez, "MATE Federation Model for Access to Technology and Education: Identity Federation Policy," Ver 0.0, Jul. 15, 2014.
8 A. Martinez, "MATE Federation Model for Access to Technology and Education: Federation Operator Practice: Metadata Registration Practice Statement," Ver 0.0, Sep. 2, 2014.
9 Federaton Policy Best Practice, https://wiki.refeds.org/display/FBP/Federation+Policy+Best+Practice
10 L. Tekeni, K. Thomson, R. A. Botha, "Concerns Regarding Service Authorization by IP Address Using eduroam," in Proc. of Information Security for South Africa (ISSA 2014), pp. 1-6, Johannesburg, South Africa, Aug. 2014.
11 J. Kallela, "Federated Identity Management Solutions," Technical Report, TKK T-110.5190, 2008, www.cse.tkk.fi/en/publications/B/1/papers/Kallela_final.pdf
12 Y. Cho, S. Jin, P. Moon, and ,"Internet ID Management System based on ID Federation: e-IDMS," The Institute of Electronics Engineers of Korea - Telecommunications, vol. 47, no. 7, pp. 104-114, Jul. 2006.
13 E. Birrell and F. B. Schneider, "Federated Identity Management Systems: A Privacy-Based Characterization," IEEE Security & Privacy, 11(5), pp. 36-48, Sep.-Oct. 2013.