Browse > Article

Evaluation of Structural Importance Based on Minimal Cut Set Theory  

Kim, Dong-Jin (한양대학교 전기공학과)
Kim, Hyung-Chul (한국철도기술연구원 전력연구팀)
Kim, Jin-O (한양대학교 전기공학과)
Publication Information
The Transactions of the Korean Institute of Electrical Engineers P / v.58, no.1, 2009 , pp. 27-32 More about this Journal
Abstract
A technical system generally comprise a number of subsystems and components that are interconnected in such a way that the system is able to perform a set of required function. Because of the complex system structure with serial, parallel and bridged connections, some certain subsystems or components are more critical than the others. The main concern of a reliability engineer is to identify potential failures and to prevent these failures from occurring. In order to prevent fatal failures, proper inspections and maintenance actions for each component are required Considering above objectives of reliability engineers and characteristics of a practical system, several practical method for evaluating system and component reliabilities have developed namely Birnbaum's and Fussell & Vesely's measures. However there are several critical weaknesses in traditional calculation process as the target system gets larger. In this paper, a new technique for calculating component's structural importance is proposed and compared to Birnbaum's with representative system examples (serial, parallel. k out of n, and bridge type).
Keywords
Birnbaum; Structural Importance; Minimal Cut Set;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Hwang, F. K. "A hierarchy of importance indices." IEEE Trans. on Reliability, vol. 54, No. 1, pp. 169-172, March 2005.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 F. C. Meng. " Relationships of Fussell-Vesely and Birnbaum importance to structural importance in coherent systems." Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 72, No. 3, pp. 241-245, June 2001.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Andrews, J. D. and Beeson, S. "Birnbaum's Measure of Component Importance for Noncoherent Systems." IEEE Trans. on Reliability, vol. 52, No. 2, pp. 213-219, June 2003.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Billinton, R, and R. N. Allen. Reliability Evaluation of Engineering Systems: Concepts and Techniques, 2nd Edition. Essex, England; Longman Scientific & Technical. 1983
5 John Moubray. Reliability-Centered Maintenance, 2Rev Edition. Butterworth-Heinmann. 1999
6 Marvin Rausand, and Arnlijot Hoyland. System Reliability Theory: Models, Statistical Methods, and Applications, 2nd Edition. Hoboken, New Jersey, USA; Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2004
7 E.E.Lewis. Introduction to Reliability Engineering, 2nd Edition. Wiley&Sons, Inc. 1995.
8 Chaudhuri, G., Hu, K. and Afshar, N. "A new approach to system reliability." IEEE Trans. on Reliability, nol. 50, No. 1, pp. 75-84, March 2001.   DOI   ScienceOn