Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4491/KSEE.2011.33.4.267

Assessment of Environmental Impacts and $CO_2$ Emissions from Soil Remediation Technologies using Life Cycle Assessment - Case Studies on SVE and Biopile Systems -  

Jeong, Seung-Woo (Department of Environmental Engineering, Kunsan National University)
Suh, Sang-Won (Bren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California-Santa Barbara)
Publication Information
Abstract
The environmental impacts of 95% remediation of a total petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated soil were evaluated using life cycle assessment (LCA). LCA of two remediation systems, soil vapor extraction (SVE) and biopile, were conducted by using imput materials and energy listed in a remedial system standardization report. Life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) results showed that the environmental impacts of SVE were all higher than those of biopile. Prominent four environmental impacts, human toxicity via soil, aquatic ecotoxicity, human toxicity via surface water and human toxicity via air, were apparently found from the LCIA results of the both remedial systems. Human toxicity via soil was the prominent impact of SVE, while aquatic ecotoxicity was the prominent impact of biopile. This study also showed that the operation stage and the activated carbon replacement stage contributed 60% and 36% of the environmental impacts of SVE system, respectively. The major input affecting the environmental impact of SVE was electricity. The operation stage of biopile resulted in the highest contribution to the entire environmental impact. The key input affecting the environmental impact of biopile was also electricity. This study suggested that electricity reduction strategies would be tried in the contaminated-soil remediation sites for archieving less environmental impacts. Remediation of contaminated soil normally takes long time and thus requires a great deal of material and energy. More extensive life cycle researches on remedial systems are required to meet recent national challenges toward carbon dioxide reduction and green growth. Furthermore, systematic information on electricity use of remedial systems should be collected for the reliable assessment of environmental impacts and carbon dioxide emissions during soil remediation.
Keywords
LCA; Carbon Dioxide; Environmental Impact; Remediation; Soil Contamination;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 환경부, 토양보전기본계획(2010-2019), (2009).
2 환경부, 오염토양 정화방법 가이드라인(2007).
3 USEPA, Superfund Green Remediation Strategy, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response(2010).
4 Lemming, G., Hauschid, M. Z. and Bjerg, P. L., "Life cycle assessment of soil and groundwater remediation technologies: literature review," Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 15, 115-127(2010).   DOI   ScienceOn
5 환경부, 오염토양 복원작업 품셈자료 산출근거 마련을 위한 연구(2003).
6 정승우, 안윤주, 이병진, 토양복원공학, 동화기술(2009).
7 환경부, 토양오염위해성평가지침(2006).
8 Johnson, P. C., Stanley, C. C., Kemblowski, M. W., Byers, D. L. and Colthart, J. D., "A practical apporach to the design, operation, and monitoring of in situ soil venting systems," Ground Water Monitor. Rem., 10, 159-178(1990).   DOI
9 Martins, S. and Gregory, S, "Effects of Natural Environmental Changes on Soil-Vapor Extraction Rates," In Proceedings of Remediation of Chlorinated and Recalcitrant Compounds, Montery, CA, United States(2006).
10 Chaineau, C. H., Yepremian, C., Vidalie, J. F., Ducreux, J. and Ballerini, D., "Bioremediation of a crude oil-polluted soil: biodegradation, leaching and toxicity assessments," Water, Air, Soil Pollut., 144, 419-440(2003).   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, ecoinvent LCI data v. 2.1(2009).
12 Leiden University, CMLCA software v.5.1(2010).
13 국토해양부, 한국건설기술연구원, 건설공사표준품셈(2011).
14 U.S. Air Force, Sustainable Remediation Tool(2010).
15 한국전력, 산업용 전기요금표(2010).
16 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Engineering and Design: Adsorption Design Guide(2001).
17 Hauschild, M. Z., Potting J., Spatial differentiation in life cycle impact assessment - the EDIP-2003 methodology; Environmental news No. 80 2005; Environmental Protection Agency, Danish Ministry of the Environment(2005).
18 Bayer, P., Heuer, E., Karl, U. and Finkel, M., "Economical and ecological comparison of granular activated carbon (GAC) adsorber refill strategies," Water Res., 39, 1719-1728(2005).   DOI   ScienceOn
19 영신산업, 토목섬유 product info, www.토목용부직포.com
20 Gallego, J. L., Sierra, C., Permanyer, A., Pelaez, A.I., Menendez- Vega, D. and Sanchez, J., "Full-scale remediation of a Jet fuel-contaminated soil: assessment of biodegradation, volatilization, and bioavailability," Water, Air, Soil Pollut., DOI: 10.1007/s11270-010-0579-6(2010).
21 Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Implementation of Life Cycle Impact Assessment Methods Data v2.2(2010).
22 USEPA, Energy Consumption and Carbon Dioxide Emissions at Superfund Cleanups, Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation(2008).