Browse > Article

Comparison of Naphthalene Degradation Efficiency and OH Radical Production by the Change of Frequency and Reaction Conditions of Ultrasound  

Park, Jong-Sung (Department of Chemistry and Environmental Sciences, Korea Army Academy at Young-Cheon)
Park, So-Young (Department of Chemistry and Environmental Sciences, Korea Army Academy at Young-Cheon)
Oh, Je-Ill (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Chung-Ang University)
Jeong, Sang-Jo (Department of Civil Engineering and Environmental Sciences, Korea Military Academy)
Lee, Min-Ju (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Chung-Ang University)
Her, Nam-Guk (Department of Chemistry and Environmental Sciences, Korea Army Academy at Young-Cheon)
Publication Information
Abstract
Naphthalene is a volatile, hydrophobic, and possibly carcinogenic compound that is known to have a severe detrimental effect to aquatic ecosystem. Our research examined the effects of various operating conditions (temperature, pH, initial concentration, and frequency and type of ultrasound) on the sonochemical degradation of naphthalene and OH radical production. The MDL (Method detection limit) determined by LC/FLD (1200 series, Agilient) using C-18 reversed column is measured up to 0.01 ppm. Naphthalene vapor produced from ultrasound irradiation was detected under 0.05 ppm. Comparison of naphthalene sonodegradion efficiency tested under open and closed reactor cover fell within less than 1% of difference. Increasing the reaction temperature from $15^{\circ}C$ to $40^{\circ}C$ resulted in reduction of naphthalene degradation efficiency ($15^{\circ}C$: 95% ${\rightarrow}$ $40^{\circ}C$: 85%), and altering pH from 12 to 3 increased the effect (pH 12: 84% ${\rightarrow}$pH 3: 95.6%). Pseudo first-order constants ($k_1$) of sonodegradation of naphthalene decreased as initial concentration of naphthalene increased (2.5 ppm: $27.3{\times}10^{-3}\;min^{-3}\;{\rightarrow}$ 10 ppm : $19.3{\times}10^{-3}\;min^{-3}$). Degradation efficiency of 2.5 ppm of naphthalene subjected to 28 kHz of ultrasonic irradiation was found to be 1.46 times as much as when exposed under 132 kHz (132 kHz: 56%, 28 kHz: 82.7%). Additionally, its $k_1$ constant was increased by 2.3 times (132 kHz: $2.4{\times}10^{-3}\;min^{-1}$, 28 kHz: $5.0{\times}10^{-3}\;min^{-1}$). $H_2O_2$ concentration measured 10 minutes after the exposure to 132 kHz of ultrasound, when compared with the measurement under frequency of 28 kHz, was 7.2 times as much. The concentration measured after 90 minutes, however, showed the difference of only 10%. (concentration of $H_2O_2$ under 28 kHz being 1.1 times greater than that under 132 kHz.) The $H_2O_2$ concentration resulting from 2.5 ppm naphthalene after 90 minutes of sonication at 24 kHz and 132 kHz were lower by 0.05 and 0.1 ppm, respectively, than the concentration measured from the irradiated M.Q. water (no naphthalene added.) Degradation efficiency of horn type (24 kHz) and bath type (28 kHz) ultrasound was found to be 87% and 82.7%, respectively, and $k_1$ was calculated into $22.8{\times}10^{-3}\;min^{-1}$ and $18.7{\times}10^{-3}\;min^{-1}$ respectively. Using the multi- frequency and mixed type of ultrasound system (28 kHz bath type + 24 kHz horn type) simultaneously resulted in combined efficiency of 88.1%, while $H_2O_2$ concentration increased 3.5 times (28 kHz + 24 kHz: 2.37 ppm, 24 kHz: 0.7 ppm.) Therefore, the multi-frequency and mixed type of ultrasound system procedure might be most effectively used for removing the substances that are easily oxidized by the OH radical.
Keywords
Naphthalene; Ultrasound; OH Radical; Frequency; Temperature; pH;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 ATSDR, "Toxicological profile for Naphthalene, 1-Methylnaphthalene, and 2-Methylnaphthalene," U.S. Department of Health And Human Services Public Health Service(2005)
2 National Tap Water Quality Database, http://www.ewg.org/tapwater/contaminants/contaminant.php?contamcode=2248(2008)
3 Lair, A., Ferronato, C., Chovelon, J. M., and Herrmann, J. M., "Naphthalene degradation in water by heterogeneous photocatalysis: An investigation of the influence of inorganic anions," J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem., 193, 193-203(2008)   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Goela, R. K., Floraa, J. R. V., and Ferryb, J. "Mechanisms for naphthalene removal during electrolytic aeration," Water Res., 37, 891-901(2003)   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Pramauro, E., Prevot, A. B., Vincenti, M., and Gamberini, R., "Photocatalytic degradation of naphthalene in aqueous $TiO_{2}$ dispersions: effect of nonionic surfactants," Chemosphere, 36(7), 1523-1542(1998)   DOI   ScienceOn
6 David, B., "Sonochemical degradation of PAH in aqueous solution. Part І: Monocomponent PAH solution, Ultrason. Sonochem., 16, 260-265(2009)   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
7 Adewuyi, Y. G., "Sonochemistry: Environmental science and engineering applications," Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 40, 4681-4715(2001)   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Thompson, L. H., and Doraiswamy, L. K., "Sonochemistry: science and engineering," Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 38, 1215-1249(1999)   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Jiang, Y., Petrier, C., and Waite, T. D., "Effect of pH on the ultrasonic degradation of ionic aromatic compounds in aqueous solution," Ultrason. Sonochem., 9, 163-168(2002)   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Maillacheruvu, K. and Safaai S., "Naphthalene removal from aqueous systems by sagittarius sp.," J. Environ. Sci. Health, 37(5), 845-861(2002)   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Laughrey, Z., Bear, E., Jones, R., and Tarr, M. A., "Aqueous sonolytic decomposition of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the presence of additional dissolved spesies," Ultrason. Sonochem., 8, 353-357(2001)   DOI   ScienceOn
12 EC-JRC, "European Chemicals Bureau. European Union Risk Assessment Report, naphthalene," European Commission Joint Research Centre, EUR 20763 EN, 1st priority List, vol. 33(2003)
13 Coopera, W. J., Nickelsena, M. G., Greenb, R. V., and Mezykc, S. P., "The removal of naphthalene from aqueous solutions using high-energy electron beam irradiation," Radiat. Phys. Chem., 65, 571-577(2002)   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Roder, M., Wojnarovits, L., and Foldiak, G., "Pulse Radiolysis of aqueous solutions of aromatic hydrocarbons in the presence of oxygen," Radiat. Phys. Chem., 36(2), 175-176(1990)   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Petrier, C. and Francony, A., "Ultrasonic waste-water treatment: incidence of ultrasonic frequency on the rate of phenol and carbon tetrachloride degradation," Ultrason. Sonochem., 4, 395-300(1997)   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naphthalene(2008)
17 Nomura, H., Koda, S., Yasuda, K., and Kojima, Y., "Quantification of ultrasonic intensity based on the decomposition reaction of porphyrin," Ultrason. Sonochem., 3, (1996)   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Ince, N. H., Tezcanli-Guyer, G., "Impacts of pH and molecular structure on ultrasonic degradation of azo dyes," Ultrason. Sonochem., 42, 591-596(2004)   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Gianotti, V., Gosetti, F., Polati, S., and Gennaro M. C., "HPLC-MSn and GC-MS methods to study sunlight and UV-lamp degradations of 1-amino-5-naphthalene sulfonate," Chemosphere, 67, 1993-1999(2007)   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Psillakis, E., Goula, G., Kalogerakis, N., and Mantzavinos, D., "Degradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in aqueous solutions by ultrasonic irradiation," J. Hazard. Mater., 108, 95-102(2004)   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
21 Klaning, U. K., Sehested, K., and Holcman, J., "Standard Gibbs energy of formation of the hydroxyl radicals in aqueous solution. Rate constant for the reaction $ClO_{2}$+ $O_{3}$ $\leftrightarrow$$O_{3}$+$ClO_{2}$," J. Phys. Chem., 89, 760(1985)   DOI
22 Hykrdov$\, L., Jirkovsk$\, J., Mailhot, G., and Bolte, M., "Fe(III) photoinduced and Q-$TiO_{2}$ photocatalysed degradation of naphthalene: comparison of kinetics and proposal of mechanism," J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem., 151, 181-193(2002)   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Park, J. K., Hong, S. W., and Chang, W. S., "Degradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by ultrasonic irradiation," Environ. Technol., 21, 1317-1323(2000)   DOI   ScienceOn