Browse > Article

Development of the Performance Indicator for the Mitigation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Products - Estimation of Social Cost for Global Warming Impact using the Conjoint Analysis -  

Jeong, In-Tae (School of Environmental Engineering, Ajou University)
Lee, Kun-Mo (School of Environmental Engineering, Ajou University)
Song, Jong-Sung (Samsung Electronics LCD Business)
Publication Information
Abstract
Proposing a method for the estimation of the social cost for global warming impact (external cost) is the aim of this paper. Both the endpoint approach and conjoint analysis were applied to estimating the social cost for global warming. The endpoint approach was used to assess the damage on the safeguard subjects by global warming due to the emission of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. The conjoint analysis was used to estimate the economic values for safeguard subjects which measure the social preferences and willingness to pay (WTP) on safeguard subjects. The economic values of human health and social asset were estimated at 62,261,700 Won / DALY (yr) and 10,000 Won / 10,000 Won, respectively. Moreover, cost factors of GHGs were calculated by multiplying the damage factor which is quantified the unit damage on safeguard subject and the economic value. In the case of CO$_2$, the cost factor was calculated at 13.52 Won / kg (13,520 Won / ton). External cost of products or services can be calculated by multiplying the GHG inventory result of products or services by the cost factor of each GHG. inventory.
Keywords
Greenhouse Gases; Global Warming; Social Cost (External Cost); Safeguard Subject; Endpoint Approach; Willingness to Pay (WTP); Conjoint Analysis; Cost Factor;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Itsubo N., Inaba A., ライフサイクル環境影響評価手法, 産業環境管理協會(JEMAI) (2005)
2 김재홍, 환경자원의 경제적 가치와 환경오염의 사회적 비용, 집문당, 경기도(2006)
3 김승우, 김홍균, 유상희, 이호생, 임종수, 정태용, 한택환, 홍종호, 환경경제학-이론과 실제-, 박영사, 서울(2003)
4 임영식, 전영섭, "헤도닉가격기법을 이용한 대기질 개선 시의 편익 추정," 자원경제학회지, 3, 81-105(1993)
5 곽승준, 조준모, "자동차의 이산화질소 배출로 인한 대기오염의 사회적 비용 분석," 교통정책연구, 3(3), 51-72(1996)
6 조승헌, 박용하, 김승우, 최용재, 생물다양성 보전을 위한 유인제도 활성화 방안(KEI/1999 기본과제 연구보고서), 한국환경정책.평가연구원(1999)
7 환경종합정보서비스(http://etips.me.go.kr), 2008년 3월 접속
8 株式會社日経リサ一チ, 経濟評価によるインパクト評価手法の開發調査報告書(2002)
9 SPSS (version 12.0) [Computer software], SPSS Korea (Datasolution) (2004)
10 Kuriyama K.(栗山浩一), EXCEL でできるコンジョイント(version 1.1), 環境経濟學ワ一キングペ一パ一#0302, 早稻田大政治経濟學部(2003)
11 McFadden, D., Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice behavior, In P. Zarembka, ed., Frontiers in Econometrics, New York: Academic Press(1974)
12 엄영숙, "환경영향평가제도와 환경영향의 가치평가," 환경경제연구, 8(1), 1999
13 Adamowicz, W., Louviere, J., and Williams, M., "Combining Revealed and Stated Preference Methods for Valuing Environmental Amenities", J. Environ. Economics Manage., 26, 271-292(1994)   DOI   ScienceOn
14 조준모, "대기오염의 사회적 비용," 21세기 대기정책 수립을 위한 대토론회 요약집, 한국대기보전학회(1996)
15 산업자원부, '온실가스 배출증가율, 1999년 이후 감소 추세 이어가 - 2004년 배출량은 1990년 대비 연평균 4.7%, 2003년 대비 1.4% 증가 -', 보도자료, 2006.10.23
16 세계도시정보(http://ubin.krihs.re.kr), 2008년 4월 접속
17 임종수, 대기오염의 사회적 비용, 한국환경정책.평가연구원(1996)
18 곽승준, 유승훈, 장정인, "컨조인트 분석을 이용한 한강하구의 가치추정," 경제학연구, 54(4), 141-160(2006)