Browse > Article

Effect of Pretreatment Process on Hybrid Membrane Filtration Performance  

Jung, Chul-Woo (Ulsan Regional Innovation Agency, Ulsan Industry Promotion Techno Park)
Son, Hee-Jong (Water Quality Research Institute, Waterworks Headquarter, Busan)
Bae, Sang-Dae (Department of Environmental Engineering, Silla University)
Publication Information
Abstract
The objectives of this research are to evaluate the effect of membrane materials, particulate matter and membrane pore size on permeate flux. It was shown that the removal efficiency of high MW organic matter more than 10 kDa was lower than that of low MW organic matter for $MIEX^{(R)}$ process. For the change of permeate flux by the pretreatment process, $MIEX^{(R)}+UF$ process showed high removal efficiency of organic matter as compared with coagulation+UF processes, but high reduction rate of permeate flux was presented through the reduction of removal efficiency of high MW organic matter. The pretreatment of the raw water significantly reduced the fouling of the hydrophilic membrane, but did not decrease the flux reduction of the hydrophobic membrane. Flux decline on MF process increased due to the pore clogging, while the permeate flux decline of UF process decreased due to the formation of cake layer. It was shown that particle matter was not effect on MIEX+membrane process. But, for coagulation+membrane process, particle matter was important factor on permeate flux.
Keywords
Coagulation; $MIEX^{(R)}$; Low Pressure Membrane; Particle; Permeate Flux;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Cadee, K., O'Leary, B., Smith, P., Slunjski, M., and Bourke, M., 'World's first magnetic ion $exchange(MIEX^{\circledR})$ water treatment plant to be installed in western Australia,' Proceedings of American Water Works Association Conference, 11-15 June, Denver(2000)
2 Singer, P. C. and Bilyk, L., 'Enhanced coagulation using a magnetic ion exchange resin,' Water Res., 36(16), 4009-4022(2002)   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Odegaard, H., Eikebrokk, B., and Storhaug, R., 'Processes for the removal of humic substances from water-an overview based on Norwegian experiences,' Water Sci. Technol., 40(9), 37-46(1999)
4 Wiesner, M. R. and Chellam, S., 'The promise of membrane technology an expanded understanding of membrane technology is fostering new environmental applications,' Environ. Sci. Technol., 33(17), 360-366(1999)   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Laine, J. M., Hagstrom, J. P., Clark, M. M., and Mallevialle, J., 'Effects of ultrafiltration membrane composition,' J. AWWA. , 81(11), 60-67(1989)   DOI
6 Drikas, M., Morran, J. Y., Pelekani, C., Hepplewhite, C., and Bursill, D. B., 'Removal of natural organic matter-a fresh approach,' Water Science and Technology: Water Supply, 2(1), 71-79(2002)   DOI
7 Lee, N. H., Sinha, S., Amy, G., and Bourke, M., 'Removal of polar natural organic matter(NOM) with a magnetically impregnated ion $exchange(MIEX^{\circledR})$ media,' American Water Works Association Annual Conference, Anaheim, California, June 16-19(2003)
8 Jonsson. A. S. and Jonsson. B., 'The influence of nonionic and ionic surfactants on hydrophobic and hydrophilic ultrafiltration membranes,' J. membrane Sci., 56, 49-76(1991)   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Marsh, A. R. and Eriksson, P. K., 'Projecting RO desalination system performance with filmtec spiral-wound eliments,' Proceedings of seminar on membrane processes, orlando, Fla.(1988)
10 Jung, C. W. and Kang, L. S., 'Application of combined coagulation-UF membrane process for water treatment,' Korean Jour. Chem. Eng., 20(5), 855-861(2003)   DOI
11 Buros, O. K., 'Desalting practices in the United States,' J. AWWA, 81(11), 38-42(1989)   DOI