Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7470/jkst.2013.31.2.033

A Numerical Analysis of Land Use-Transportation Model as a Form of Analytical Tool  

Yu, Sang-Gyun (Department of Urban Engineering, Daejin University)
Rhee, Hyok-Joo (Department of Public Administration, Seoul National University of Science and Technology)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Society of Transportation / v.31, no.2, 2013 , pp. 33-44 More about this Journal
Abstract
The land use-transportation models typically have complicated model structure that is good for empirical execution but bad for theoretical probe. This complexity makes it very difficult to derive the first-order conditions for system optimization in tractable forms. Yu and Rhee (2011) and Rhee (2012) show how to simplify the derivative of the model's objective function with respect to policy variables in the computable general equilibrium model of land use and transportation. However, the travel demand in their model was fixed. This drawback fundamentally limits the applicability of their methodology in the planning field. We relax this restriction. Once this is done, we can employ the methodology developed in analyzing the impacts of various types of policy instruments in the models where land market is treated endogenously and transportation network is embedded.
Keywords
Analytical Methodology; Computable General Equilibrium Model; Elastic Travel Demand; Land Use-Transportation Model; Welfare Function;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Ben-Akiva M., Lerman S. R. (1985), Discrete Choice Analysis, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
2 Fujita M., Thisse J. -F. (2002), Economics of Agglomeration, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
3 Hamilton B. W., Roell A. (1982), Wasteful Commuting, Journal of Political Economy, Vol.90, No.5, pp.1035-1053.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Kim I. K. (1994), Theoretical Comparison of Land-Use/Transportation Models, The journal of Korea Planners Assiciation, Vol.29, No.4, pp.135-155.
5 May A. D., Milne D. S. (2009), Effects of Alternative Road Procing Systems on Network Performance, Transportation Research Part A, Vol.34, pp.723-736.
6 Mun S., Konish K., Yoshikawa K. (2005), Optimal Cordon Pricing in a Non-Monocentric City, Transportation Research Part B, Vol.39, pp.723-736.
7 Nechyba T., Walsh R. (2004), Urban Sprawl, Journal of Economic Perspectives Vol.18 No.4, pp.177-200.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Rhee H. J. (2012), Welfare Function of Theory-Based Spatial Equilibrium Models and Congestion Tolls, The Journal of Korea Planners' Association, Vol.47, No.4, pp.183-192.
9 Rossi-Hansberg E. (2004), Optimal Urban Land Use and Zoning, Review of Economic Dynamics Vol.7, pp.69-106.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Waddell P. (2001), Towards a Behavioral Integration of Land Use and Transportation Modeling, 9th International Association for Travel Behavior Research Conference, Queensland, Australia.
11 Wheaton W. C. (2004), Commuting, Congestion, and Employment Dispersal in Cities with Mixed Land Use, Journal of Urban Economics, Vol.55, pp.417-438.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Yu S. G., Rhee H. J. (2011), A study of the welfare Function of a spatial Equilibrium Model and the Implications, The journal of Korea Planners Assiciation, Vol.46, No.4, pp.199-208.
13 Yu S. G., Rhee H. J., Kim H. K. (2010), Development of Land Use Transportation Model with Route Choice, The journal of Korea Planners Assiciation, Vol.45, No.1, pp.123-137.   과학기술학회마을
14 Zhang X., Yang H. (2004), The Optimal Cordon-Based Network Congestion Pricing Problem, Transportation Research Part B, Vol.38, pp.517-537.   DOI   ScienceOn