Browse > Article

Travel Demand and Transportation Cost of Household According to Accessibility to Public Transport and to Service Facilities  

Kim, Seong-Gil (공주대학교 방재연구센터 건설환경공학부)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Society of Transportation / v.24, no.6, 2006 , pp. 65-74 More about this Journal
Abstract
The costs of owning car are accepted as a subscription fee for participating in car-oriented society and only direct out-of-pocket costs of driving are mostly considered, so that the efficient location with better accessibility to service facilities is often under-appreciated. The purpose of this study is to explore the impact of accessibility to public transport and other service facilities on travel demand and transportation cost of household. The residential areas in Hamburg are categorized into 8 types according to level of public transport and other service facilities. The costs of owning and operating car in each residential area are calculated on the base of the household automobile ownership and usage analysed through the actual survey The result of this analysis shows that the transportation cost of household is decreased In proportion to the level of Public transport and other service facilities. This analysis finds the structure of residential area, which economize energy consume and makes household actual transportation cost saying Possible. The result of the analysis can be used as a tool for influencing home locaion choice towards Public transportaion corridors.
Keywords
Travel Demand; Transportation Cost; Accessibility to Public Transport; Accessibility to Service Facilities; Home Location Choice;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Downes, J.D. and Emmerson, P.(1985), Urban Travel Modelling with Flexible Travel Budgets, Transport and Road Research Laboratory, Crowthorne
2 Hess, Daniel Baldwin and Ong, Paul M. (2001), Traditional Neighborhoods and Auto Ownership, Los Angeles, UCLA, School of Public Policy and Social Research
3 Hickling Lewis Brod Inc.(1996), Transit's Value in Neighborhoods: Working Paper 1, April 8, 1996, p.15
4 Holtzclaw, John(1994), Using Residential Pattern and Transit to Decrease Auto Dependence and Cost, Natural Resources Defense Council, San Francisco, CA, http://www.commuterchoice.com, Financial. Benefits for Individuals, available 10. 03. 2003
5 Surface Transportation Policy Project and Center for Neighborhood Technology (2000), Driven to Spend, Washington, DC, available 17. 01. 2001. http://www.transact.org/Reports/driven/one/htm
6 Gutsche, J.-M.(2001), Verkehrseffekte des Wohnungsneubaus im Grossraum Hamburg, ECTL-Working Paper 6, Hamburg
7 Klein, Stefan(1999), Beeinflussung der Verkehrsmittelwahl im Personenverkehr: Ermi-ttlung des kommunalen Handlung-sspielraums im Stadtevergleich, Bielefeld
8 Holz-Rau, Christian and Kutter, Eckhard (1995), Verkehrsvermeidung Siedlungsstrukturelle und organisatorische Konzept, Materialien zur Raumentwicklung Heft 73, Bonn
9 Schleswig-Holstein-Landesplanungsbehorde( 1998), Regionalplan fur den Planungsraum I, Schleswig-Holstein Sd, Fortschreibung
10 Parsons, Brinckerhoff, Quade and Schimek, Paul,(1996), Household Motor Vehicle Ownership and Use: How Much Does Residential Density Matter? National Research Council, Transportation Research Board, Washington DC
11 황금회(2001), '교통에너지절약형 도시성장패턴구축을 위한 토지이용전략', 경기개발연구원, pp.104-106
12 Kutter, Eckhard and Stein, Axel(1998), Minderung des Regionalverkehrs, Forschungsbericht des BBR, Heft 87, Bonn
13 권영종.오재학(2004), '대중교통지향형 도시개발과 교통체계 구축방안', 한국교통연구원, p.9, p.63
14 Statistisches Landesamt Hamburg(2002), Hamburger Statistisches Jahrbuch 2001/2002, Hamburg
15 Kim, Sung-Gil(2003), 'Beeinflussung der Wohnstandortentscheidung für OPNV-Lagen durch die Anreizstrategie Location Efficient Value(LEV)', ECTL working paper 24, TU-Hamburg
16 Cervero, Robert(1996), 'Mixed land uses and commuting: evidence from the American Housing Survey', Transportation Research A 30, S. pp.361-377   DOI   ScienceOn