Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.29214/damis.2019.38.1.002

A Study on Personalized Product Demand Manufactured by Smart Factory  

Woo, Su-Han (Smart factory management, Chungbuk National University)
Kwon, Sun-Dong (Department of MIS, Chungbuk National University)
Publication Information
Management & Information Systems Review / v.38, no.1, 2019 , pp. 23-41 More about this Journal
Abstract
Smart Factory is different from existing factory automation in that it aims to produce personalized products with minimum time and cost through ICT. However, previous researches, not from consumers but from product suppliers, have focused on technology trends and technology application methods. In order for Smart Factory to be successful, it must go beyond supplier-focus to meet the needs of consumers. In this study, we surveyed the purchase intention of the personalized product manufactured by smart factory. Influencing factors of purchase intention were drawn as consumers' need for uniqueness, innovativeness, need for touch, and privacy concern, based on previous research. As results of data analysis, it was confirmed that respondents were willing to purchase personalized products, and that consumers' need for uniqueness, innovativeness, and need for touch had a significant impact on purchase intention of personalized products. Our findings can be summarized as follows. First, Consumers' need for uniqueness was found to have positive effects(${\beta}=0.168$) on purchase intention of personalized products. The desire to differentiate themselves from others will be reflected in their personalized products. Therefore, consumers with a higher desire for uniqueness tend to be more willing to purchase personalized products. Second, consumer innovativeness was found to have positive effects(${\beta}=0.233$) on purchase intention of personalized products. Personalized shoes suggested in this study is a new type of personalized product that is manufactured by the latest information and communication technologies such as multi-function robots and 3D printing. Therefore, consumers seeking innovative new experiences are more willing to purchase personalized products. Third, need for touch was found to have positive effects(${\beta}=0.299$) on purchase intention of personalized products. In a smart factory environment, prosuming participation is given to consumers. If consumers participate in the product development process and reflect their requirements on the product, they are expected to increase their purchase intention by virtually satisfying the need for touch. Fourth, privacy concern was found to have no significantly related to purchase intention of personalized products. This is interpreted as a willingness to tolerate the risk of exposing personal information such as home address, telephone number, body size, and preference for consumers who feel highly useful in personalized products.
Keywords
Smart factory; Personalized product; Need for uniqueness; Innovativeness; Need for touch; Privacy concern;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Peck, J. and T. L. Childers(2003b), "Individual differences n haptic information processing: The 'Need for Touch'scale," Journal of Consumer Research, 30(3), 430-442.   DOI
2 Peppers, D. and Rogers, M.(1997), The One to One Future: Building Relationships One Customer at a Time(Будущее персонализ ации: построение взаимоотношений с одним клиентом).
3 Rogers, E. M. and Shoemaker, F. F.(1971), Communication of Innovations: A Cross-Cultural Approach.
4 Rogers, E. M.(1983), Diffusion of Innovation, New York : Free Press.
5 Rogers, E. M.(2003), The diffusion of innovation, 5th edition, New York : Free Press.
6 Snyder, C. R.(1992), "Product scarcity by need for uniqueness interaction: a consumer catch-22 carousel?," Basic and applied social psychology, 13(1), 9-24.   DOI
7 Snyder, C. R. and Fromkin, H. L.(1977), "Abnormality as a positive characteristic: The development and validation of a scale measuring need for uniqueness," Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 86(5), 518.   DOI
8 Tepper, K. and Hoyle, R. H.(1996), "The latent variable models of need for uniqueness," Multivariate Behavioral Research, 31(4), 467-494.   DOI
9 Tian, K. T., Bearden, W. O., and Hunter, G. L.(2001), "Consumers' need for uniqueness: Scale development and validation," Journal of Consumer Research, 28(1), 50-66.   DOI
10 Wetzels, M., Odekerken-Schröder, G., and Van Oppen, C.(2009), "Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: Guidelines and empirical illustration," MIS Quarterly, 33(1), 177-195.   DOI
11 김영훈(2016), "POSRI 보고서 -전통 제조업 부활의 Key, 스마트 유연생산," POSRI 이슈리포트, 제4호, pp. 56-65.
12 권순동.전달영.김용영(2012), "위험이 구매 의도에 미치는 영향의 재조명: 전자상거래 용자 집단의 혁신성을 중심으로," Journal of Information Technology Applications & Management, 19(2), 233-247.   DOI
13 박정렬.권순동.박현정(2016), "스마트 환경에서 오프라인, 온라인, 옴니채널 선호도의 영향요인에 관한 한.중 비교연구," Journal of Information Technology Applications & Management, 23(2), 239-261.   DOI
14 고미현.권순동(2008), "인터넷 커뮤니티에서 사용자 참여가 밀착도와 지속적 이용의도에 미치는 영향," Asia Pacific Journal of Information System, 18(2), 41-72.
15 김상훈.심우중(2016), 위기감 속 제조혁신 경쟁, 해법은 제각각, 테크엠, 제37호,
16 김일한.권순동(2018), "클라우드 기반 VDI 도입 성과에 관한 연구-시스템 관리자와 일반 사용자의 비교를 중심으로," 경영과 정보연구, 37(2), 149-167.
17 노태협(2016), "ICT 기반 지역 공유경제형 사회적 기업 사례 연구," Information Systems Review, 18(1), 157-175.   DOI
18 도남철(2017), "개인제조를 위한 통합 BOM 관리 시스템 개발," 한국CDE학회 논문집, 22(4), 352-362.
19 박호진(2015), "개방형 스마트 홈 기술개발 및 실증사업," 2015년한국경영정보학회 춘계학술대회논문집, 395-403
20 백수현(2016), 스마트제조의 글로벌 현주소와 표준화 추진방향. 한국과학기술기획평가원.
21 산업통상자원부(2015), "제조업 혁신 3.0 구현을 위한 스마트공장 확산 추진계획," 산업자원통상자원부.
22 애재.권순동.이수철.고미현.이보형(2017), "핀테크 서비스에서 오프라인에서 온라인으로의 신뢰전이에 관한 연구," 경영과 정보연구, 36(3), 167-184.
23 김완석.김영재(2005), "소비자의 독특성욕구와 소비행동: 구매목적과 상품유형과의 상호작용," 한국심리학회지: 소비자.광고, 6(2), 79-101
24 원려나.김정희(2015), "독특성 욕구가 충동 구매, 후회, 만족에 미치는 영향: 중국 패션 제품 소비자를 중심으로," 상품학연구, 33(2), 105-116.   DOI
25 이유경(2011), "소비자의 불확실성 회피성향과 제품 접촉욕구가 온라인 쇼핑에 대한 신뢰와 구매의도에 미치는 영향," 소비문화연구, 14(2), 77-94.
26 정명근(2005), 소비자의 독특성 욕구와 인지욕구가 중소기업 브랜드 태도, 구매 의도 및 선호도에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구, 서울산업대학교 산업대학원 e business 경영학과, 석사학위논문.
27 정영수.정철호(2009), "1인 미디어의 지각된 위험 및 상호작용성이 사용자 만족과 몰입에 미치는 영향," 경영과 정보연구, 28(1), 125-156.
28 Kwon, S. D., Choi, W., Fang, H. L., and Ko, M.. H.(2010), "Comparative Study on the Influential Factors of Internet shopping mall Performance between Korea and China," Korea Management Review, 39(3), 851-877.
29 최영환.최상현(2017), "스마트공장 시스템 구축이 중소기업 경쟁력에 미치는 요인에 관한 연구," Information Systems Review, 19(2), 95-113.   DOI
30 Koren, Y.(2011), The Global Manufacturing Revolution: Product-Process-Business Integration and Reconfigurable Systems, Wiley, Hoboken.
31 Ajzen, I. and Fishbein, M.(1980), Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour.
32 Dinev, T. and Hart, P.(2004), "Internet Privacy Concerns and Their Antecedents-Measurement Validity and a Regression Model," Behavior and Information Technology, 23(6), 413-423.   DOI
33 Dinev, T., Bellotto, M.., Hart, P., Russo, V., Serra, I., and Colautti, C.(2006), "Privacy Calculus Model in E-Commerce-A Study of Italy and the United States," European Journal of Information Systems, 15(4), 389-402.   DOI
34 Dyche, J.(2002), The CRM handbook: A business guide to customer relationship management. Addison-Wesley Professional.
35 Finch, B. J.(1999). "Internet discussions as a source for consumer product customer involvement and quality information: an exploratory study," Journal of Operations Management, 17(5), 535-556.   DOI
36 Fornell, C. and Larcker, D. F.(1981), "Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error," Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.   DOI
37 Franke, N. and Schreier, M.(2008), "Product uniqueness as a driver of customer utility in mass customization," Marketing Letters, 19(2), 93-107.   DOI
38 Guldner, F.(2015), Market Dynamics Behind Industrie 4.0 and the Industrial Internet of Things, Massachusetts: ARC Advisory Group.
39 Franke, N., Peter K., and Christoph J. S.(2009), "Testing the Value of Customization: When Do Customers Really Prefer Products Tailored to Their Preferences?," Journal of Marketing, 73(5), 103-121.   DOI
40 Goldsmith, R. E. and Hofacker, C. F.(1991), "Measuring consumer innovativeness," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 19(3), 209-221.   DOI
41 Hirschman, E. C.(1980), "Innovativeness, novelty seeking, and consumer creativity," Journal of Consumer Research, 7(3), 283-295.   DOI
42 Hoffmann, S. and Soyez, K.(2010), "A cognitive model to predict domain-specific consumer innovativeness," Journal of Business Research, 63(7), 778-785.   DOI
43 Midgley, D. F. and Dowling, G. R.(1978), "Innovativeness: The concept and its measurement," Journal of Consumer Research, 4(4), 229-242.   DOI
44 Midgley, D. F. and Dowling, G. R.(1993), "A longitudinal study of product form innovation: The interaction between predispositions and social messages," Journal of Consumer Research, 19(4), 611-625.   DOI
45 Nasution, R. A. and Garnida, N.(2010), A review of the three streams of consumer innovativeness. In Technology Management for Global Economic Growth(PICMET), 2010 Proceedings of PICMET'10:(1-11). IEEE.
46 Pan, Y. and Zinkhan, G. M.(2006), "Exploring the impact of online privacy disclosures on consumer trust," Journal of Retailing, 82(4), 331-338.   DOI
47 Peck, J. and T. L. Childers(2003a), "To have and to hold: The influence of haptic information on product judgments," Journal of Marketing, 67(2), 35-48.   DOI