Browse > Article

The Design Feature of Self-work Model Senior Cohousing Projects in Denmark  

최정신 (가톨릭대학교 생활과학부 소비자·주거학 전공)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association / v.41, no.4, 2003 , pp. 1-19 More about this Journal
Abstract
In Scandinavian countries, where the society experienced change of typical nuclear family structure and higher vocational activity rates of married women earlier than East Asian countries, cohousing scheme has been evolved as an alternative housing to reduce housework for working women, and to reduce loneliness of elderly people who stay in their own homes. They can promote active mutual relationship among residents in the community. Korean family structure has been stemmed to more like extended family, but the tendency to live independently from their married children is getting more and more common in new cohort of senior citizens who are active, healthy, economically stable and higher educated. Korea has been industrialized rather rapidly since 1970's and faces to many societal phenomena about quality of life for senior citizens. Introduction of alternative housing solution for these senior citizens is necessary in Korea. In this paper, Danish senior cohousing scheme, particularly, self-work model project is described about its design feature in accordance to site planning, common facility, and dwelling unit. Aiming to mutual support and more frequent social contacts among residents, self-work model cohousing scheme has different design concept from the service mode scheme. Information about design feature of senior cohousing was collected from the published data with drawings and from field survey to 10 exiting projects in Denmark. Of those, 5 projects were described as a case study. It, hopefully, could provide practical information for architectural design when establishment of senior cohousing schemes start in Korea in the near future.
Keywords
cohousing; elderly housing; Denmark; Sweden; self-work model; service model; Scandinavia;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 최정신(1999). 이웃끼리 어울려 사는 미래주거의 새로운 대안. 주택저널. 1999년 10월호, 102-107
2 Christensen S. K. & Kristensen T. (1972). Kollektiver i Danmark. Sj${\ae}$lland: Borgen/basis
3 Danish Building Research Institute (1984). SBI Report 187: Cohousing Communities, Collection of Examples. Kebenhavn
4 Jensen, S.P. (1994). Summary and Conclusions of the Conference on Cohousing for Senior Citizens in Europe. BiC, Copenhagen, Denmark, 8-13
5 Moulvad, U, (1994). Introduction, Co-housing for Senior Citizens in Eurape, BiC (Housing and Well-being in Focus). Copenhagen, Denmark. 6-7
6 Vestbro, D. U. (1997). Collective housing in Scandinavia-How Feminism Revised a Modernist Experiment. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 14(4), 329-342
7 Vestbro, D. U. (2000). From Collective Housing to Cohousing-A Summary of Research. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 17(2), 164-177
8 Hansen, E. B., Dahle, A., Gottschalk, G. & Jensen, S. P. (2000). ${\AE}$ldre, i boftellesskab, SBI
9 Werborg, R., (1994). Housing Policy for the Elderly in Denmark. Co-housing for Senior Citizens in Europe. BiC Copenhagen, Denmark, 25-32
10 Vestbro, D. U. (1992). From Central Kitchen to Community Cooperation: Development of Collective Housing in Sweden. Open House International, 17(2), 30-38
11 Pedersen, M. (1999). Seniorbof${\ae}$ellesskaber...hvorfor og hiordan, BiC K${\o}$benhavn
12 McCamant, K. & Durrett, C. (1994). Cohousing, A Contemporary Approach to Housing Ourselves. Ten Speed Press, Berkeley. USA
13 Foreningen Bofeelleskaber for lEldre (1997). Registerant over 42 danske Seniorbof${\ae}$llesskaber. K${\o}$benhavn
14 최정신(2000). 댄마크 노인주택의 대안: 노인용 코하우징. 한국스칸디나비아학회 제3회 학술발표대회 프로시딩. 31-45
15 남궁서영, 최정(2001). 코하우징의 공동생활시설계획. 대한가정학회 2001년도 제54차 춘계학술대회 논문 발표집. 91
16 Ambrose, I. (1993). Etablering af seniorbof${\ae}$llesskaber, Erfaringer fratre projekter i Odense, Statens Byggeforskningsinstitut
17 권오정 (2000). ‘게오르그스 리스트후스’. 세계의 코하우징. 서울: 교문사. 80-89
18 Caldenby, C, (1992). Vad $\ddot{a}r$ ett kollektivhus?(What constitutes a collective housing unit?) PhD. thesis, C$\ddot{o}$teborg: School of Architecture, Chalmers University of Technology
19 Langkilde, H. E. (1970). Kollecktivehuset-En boligforms udvikling i dansk arkitektur (The collective housing unit- the development of a house form in Danish architecture). Videnskabs Forlag. K${\o}$benhavn
20 Fich, M., Mortensen, P.D., & Zahle, K. (1995). De Gamles Huse. Kunstakakademiets Forlag, Arkitektskolen. Kebenhavn
21 Pedersen, M. (2000). Nybyggere i den tredje alder, -om boff${\ae}$llesskaber, BiC, K${\o}$benhavn
22 Vestbro, D.U, (1998). The Study of Collective Housing: A Swedish Perspective. The Meaning and Use of Housing. Edited by Ernesto G. Arias, Avebury, USA, 405-424
23 Friis, H. (1994). Changing Elderly in a Changing Society, Danish Elderly in the Next Century. Presentation paper at the Conference of Co-housing for Senior Citizens in Europe. BiC, Copenhagen
24 Henriksen, S., Linda, H gemark, L., Kahler, M. ,& Zahle,K., (1991). Sammen og dog sig sIev. Handbag om bof${\ae}$ellesskaber for ${\ae}$ldre. Socialministeriets Informations og konsuIentvirksomhed. K${\o}$benhavn