Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4040/jkan.21108

Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of Assessment of Health Literacy in Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening  

Shin, Hye Sook (College of Nursing Science, Kyung Hee University)
Chi, Eunlim (Graduate School of Education, Kyung Hee University)
Han, Hae-Ra (School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing / v.51, no.6, 2021 , pp. 769-781 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: Health literacy is a significant determinant of health and health behaviors such as cancer screening. Despite its significance, there are limited instruments available to assess health literacy targeting Koreans. The purpose of this study was to test the psychometric properties of Korean translation of a validated health literacy instrument in cancer screening-Korean version of assessment of health literacy in breast and cervical cancer screening (K-AHL-C). Methods: A total of 555 women aged 20~65 participated in the online survey study. Of 52 items addressing five domains included in the original version, we focused on 36 items addressing three key domains closely associated with cancer screening: familiarity, health navigation, and comprehension. Results: During content validation, two items from the health navigation domain were removed, yielding 34 items. Using Rasch analysis and confirmatory factor analysis, we found the evidence of construct validity of K-AHL-C. The Korean version was also significantly correlated with measures of Functional Health Literacy scale, cancer prevention behaviors, and subjective health status, suggesting convergent validities respectively. Finally, K-AHL-C had acceptable reliability coefficients (α) ranging from 0.71 to 0.92 for each domain and the total scale. Conclusion: These psychometric properties support the K-AHL-C is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring Koreans' health literacy in cancer screening. Also it is expected to use the instrument to detect breast and cervical cancer early and improve the screening rate, and ultimately to contribute to the promotion of women's health and women's health nursing practice.
Keywords
Health Literacy; Cancer Screening; Breast; Uterine Cervix; Psychometrics;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 5  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Davis TC, Long SW, Jackson RH, Mayeaux EJ, George RB, Murphy PW, et al. Rapid estimate of adult literacy in medicine: A shortened screening instrument. Family Medicine. 1993;25(6):391-395.
2 Weiss BD, Mays MZ, Martz W, Castro KM, DeWalt DA, Pignone MP, et al. Quick assessment of literacy in primary care: The Newest Vital Sign. The Annals of Family Medicine. 2005;3(6):514-522. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.405   DOI
3 Baker DW. The meaning and the measure of health literacy. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2006;21(8):878-883. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00540.x   DOI
4 Woo JP. The concept and understanding of structural equation model: Amos 4.0~20.0. Seoul: Hannarae; 2012. p. 275-361.
5 Bandalos DL. Measurement theory and applications for the social sciences. New York (NY): The Guilford Press; 2018. p. 345.
6 Hwang H. Health literacy, cancer knowledge, and cancer preventive behaviors among rural older adults. Asian Oncology Nursing. 2016;16(4):234-241. https://doi.org/10.5388/aon.2016.16.4.234   DOI
7 Song EO, Hong GR. Validity and reliability of the Korean version of the basic physical capability scale for older adults. Korean Journal of Adult Nursing. 2020;32(1):21-34. https://doi.org/10.7475/kjan.2020.32.1.21   DOI
8 Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 2nd ed. New York (NY): The Guilford Press; 2005. p. 138-140.
9 Linacre JM. Rasch model estimation: Further topics. Journal of Applied Measurement. 2004;5(1):95-110.
10 Kang SJ, Lee TW, Paasche-Orlow MK, Kim GS, Won HK. Development and evaluation of the Korean Health Literacy Instrument. Journal of Health Communication. 2014;19 Suppl 2:254-266. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2014.946113   DOI
11 Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL, Ostelo RW, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: A scoring system for the COSMIN checklist. Quality of Life Research. 2012;21(4):651-657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-9960-1   DOI
12 Hong IH, Eun Y. Health literacy of inpatients at general hospital. Korean Journal of Adult Nursing. 2012;24(5):477-488. https://doi.org/10.7475/kjan.2012.24.5.477   DOI
13 Parker RM, Baker DW, Williams MV, Nurss JR. The test of functional health literacy in adults: A new instrument for measuring patients' literacy skills. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 1995;10(10):537-541. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02640361   DOI
14 National Health Insurance Service (NHIS). Annual report of cancer statistics in Korea in 2020 [Internet]. Wonju: NHIS; c2020 [cited 2020 Dec 30]. Available from: https://www.nhis.or.kr/nhis/together/wbhaea01600m01.do?mode=view&articleNo=10803724.
15 Korean Breast Cancer Society (KBCS). Breast cancer facts & figures [Internet]. Seoul: KBCS; c2020 [cited 2020 Dec 29]. Available from: https://www.kbcs.or.kr/journal/file/210107.pdf.
16 National Cancer Information Center (NCIC). Cancer prevention and screening in Korea in 2016: Breast Cancer Screening Recommendations [Internet]. Goyang: NCIC; c2016 [cited 2020 Apr 1]. Available from: https://www.cancer.go.kr/docview/preview.do?uuid=58d7aa0b-f1c8-46c0-b275-2e78cea0df47.pdf.
17 Kim YJ, Lee GE. Evaluation of readability of health leaflets and health literacy of elderly inpatients in a medical center. Journal of Korean Gerontological Nursing. 2014;16(1):9-17. https://doi.org/10.17079/jkgn.2014.16.1.9   DOI
18 Kim S, Oh J, Lee Y. Health literacy: An evolutionary concept analysis. The Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education. 2013;19(4):558-570. https://doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2013.19.4.558   DOI
19 Han HR, Kim K, Cudjoe J, Kim MT. Familiarity, navigation, and comprehension: Key dimensions of health literacy in Pap test use among Korean American women. Journal of Health Communication. 2019;24(6):585-591. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2019.1607955   DOI
20 Kim EJ, Kim SH. Associations among health literacy, psychosocial factors, and cancer-related health actions: A systematic literature review. Korean Journal of Adult Nursing. 2018;30(6):565-576. https://doi.org/10.7475/kjan.2018.30.6.565   DOI
21 Lee M, Shin HG, Lee M, Park CY. Research trends and policy issues of health literacy in Korea. Journal of Health Technology Assessment. 2018;6(1):22-32. https://doi.org/10.34161/johta.2018.6.1.004   DOI
22 Suh SR, Jung BY, So HS, Tae YS. A study to advance the development of educational programs for the early detection and prevention of the five major cancer in Korea. Journal of Korean Academy of Adult Nursing. 1998;10(2):268-280.
23 Kang H. A guide on the use of factor analysis in the assessment of construct validity. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2013;43(5):587-594. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2013.43.5.587   DOI
24 Bandalos DL. Measurement theory and applications for the social sciences. New York (NY): The Guilford Press; 2018. p. 186, 254-297.
25 Jeong JH, Kim JS. Health literacy, health risk perception and health behavior of elders. Journal of Korean Academy of Community Health Nursing. 2014;25(1):65-73. https://doi.org/10.12799/jkachn.2014.25.1.65   DOI
26 Lee EH, Kim CJ, Kim EJ, Chae HJ, Cho SY. Measurement properties of self-report questionnaires published in Korean nursing journals. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2013;43(1):50-58. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2013.43.1.50   DOI
27 Kim B, Kim I, Choi H. Psychometric properties and item evaluation of Korean version of night eating questionnaire (KNEQ). Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2016;46(1):109-117. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2016.46.1.109   DOI
28 Kim EJ, Jung JY. Psychometric properties of the Alzheimer's disease knowledge Scale-Korean version. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2015;45(1):107-117. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2015.45.1.107   DOI
29 Allen MJ, Yen WM. Introduction to measurement theory. Long Grove (IL): Waveland Press, Inc.; 2002. p. 110.
30 National Cancer Information Center (NCIC). Cancer prevention and screening in Korea in 2015: Cervical Cancer Screening Recommendations [Internet]. Goyang: NCIC; c2015 [cited 2020 May 1]. Available from: https://www.cancer.go.kr/docview/preview.do?uuid=12a312b8-9e7a44b9-8b1b-f62f12461e2e.pdf.
31 Kim S, Park DJ, Choi J. The relationship between sub-dimensions of health literacy and health-related behaviors among Korean adults. Health and Social Welfare Review. 2019;39(1):334-364. https://doi.org/10.15709/hswr.2019.39.1.334   DOI
32 Park JY, June KJ. Influencing factors on functional health literacy among the rural elderly. Journal of Korean Academy of Community Health Nursing. 2011;22(1):75-85. https://doi.org/10.12799/jkachn.2011.22.1.75   DOI
33 Kang SJ, Lee MS. Evidence-based health literacy improvements: Trends on health literacy studies in Korea. Korean Journal of Health Education and Promotion. 2015;32(4):93-108. https://doi.org/10.14367/kjhep.2015.32.4.93   DOI
34 Kim SS, Kim SH, Lee, SY. Health literacy: Development of a Korean health literacy assessment tool. Journal of Korean Society for Health Education and Promotion. 2005;22(4):215-227.
35 Kim J. Measuring the level of health literacy and influence factors: Targeting the visitors of a university hospital's outpatient clinic. Journal of Korean Clinical Nursing Research. 2011;17(1):27-34.
36 Kang SJ, Lee TW, Kim GS, Lee JH. The levels of health literacy and related factors among middle-aged adults in Seoul, Korea. Korean Journal of Health Education and Promotion. 2012;29(3):75-89.
37 Lee JE, Lee SY, Noh HK, Lee E. The influence of functional health literacy on health promotion behavior. Journal of the Korean Data and Information Science Society. 2015;26(6):1427-1438. https://doi.org/10.7465/jkdi.2015.26.6.1427   DOI
38 Linacre JM. Winsteps [computer Program]. Version. 4.5. Portland: Winsteps.com; 2020. Available from: https://www.winsteps.com/winsteps.htm.
39 Muthen LK, Muthen BO. Mplus [computer Program]. Version. 7. Los Angeles: Muthen & Muthen; 2012. Available from: https://www.statmodel.com/index.shtml.
40 Chi EL, Chae SH. Theory and practice of Rasch model. Seoul: Educational Science; 2000. p. 41.
41 DeVon HA, Block ME, Moyle-Wright P, Ernst DM, Hayden SJ, Lazzara DJ, et al. A psychometric toolbox for testing validity and reliability. Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 2007;39(2):155-164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2007.00161.x   DOI
42 Lee TW, Kang SJ. Health literacy in the Korean elderly and influencing factors. Journal of the Korean Gerontological Society. 2008;28(4):847-863.
43 Han HR, Huh B, Kim MT, Kim J, Nguyen T. Development and validation of the assessment of health literacy in breast and cervical cancer screening. Journal of Health Communication. 2014;19 Suppl 2:267-284. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2014.936569   DOI
44 Ministry of Health and Welfare (MOHW). Enjoy a healthy life by practicing cancer prevention![Internet]. Sejong: MOHW; c2019 [cited 2019 Mar 22]. Available from: http://www.mohw.go.kr/react/al/sal0301vw.jsp?PAR_MENU_ID=04&MENU_ID=0403&page=1&CONT_SEQ=348606.
45 Kim SH, Lee E. The influence of functional literacy on perceived health status in Korean older adults. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2008;38(2):195-203. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2008.38.2.195   DOI
46 Matsuoka S, Kato N, Kayane T, Yamada M, Koizumi M, Ikegame T, et al. Development and validation of a heart failure-specific health literacy scale. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing. 2016;31(2):131-139. https://doi.org/10.1097/JCN.0000000000000226   DOI
47 Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity index: Are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health. 2006;29(5):489-497. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20147   DOI
48 National Cancer Center (NCC). National Cancer Information Center [Internet]. Goyang: NCC; 2020 [cited 2020 Dec 29]. Available from: https://www.ncc.re.kr/prBoardView1.ncc?nwsId=6336&searchKey=total&searchValue=2020&pageNum=1
49 Lee EH. Psychometric property of an instrument 1: Content validity. Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing. 2021;27(1):10-13. https://doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2021.01.31   DOI