1 |
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. West Sussex, UK: Wiley.
|
2 |
Braga, L. H., Pemberton, J., Demaria, J., & Lorenzo, A. J. (2011). Methodological concerns and quality appraisal of contemporary systematic reviews and meta-analyses in pediatric urology. The Journal of Urology, 186(1), 266-271. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.03.044
DOI
ScienceOn
|
3 |
Song, F., Eastwood, A. J., Gilbody, S., Duley, L., & Sutton, A. J. (2000). Publication and related biases. Health Technology Assessment (Winchester, England), 4(10), 1-115.
|
4 |
Stroup, D. F., Berlin, J. A., Morton, S. C., Olkin, I., Williamson, G. D., Rennie, D., et al. (2000). Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: A proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 283(15), 2008-2012.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
5 |
Suebnukarn, S., Ngamboonsirisingh, S., & Rattanabanlang, A. (2010). A systematic evaluation of the quality of meta-analyses in endodontics. Journal of Endodontics, 36(4), 602-608. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.12.019
DOI
ScienceOn
|
6 |
Sutton, A. J., Abrams, K. R., Jones, D. R., Sheldon, T. A., & Song, F. (2000). Methods for meta-analysis in medical research. New York, NY: Wiley.
|
7 |
Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P., et al. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62(10), e1-e34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006
DOI
ScienceOn
|
8 |
Lim, S. M., Shin, E. S., Lee, S. H., Seo, K. H., Jung, Y. M., & Jang, J. E. (2011). Tools for assessing quality and risk of bias by levels of evidence. Journal of the Korean Medical Association, 54(4), 419-429. http://dx.doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2011.54.4.419
DOI
ScienceOn
|
9 |
MacDonald, S. L., Canfield, S. E., Fesperman, S. F., & Dahm, P. (2010). Assessment of the methodological quality of systematic reviews published in the urological literature from 1998 to 2008. The Journal of Urology, 184(2), 648-653. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2010.03.127
DOI
ScienceOn
|
10 |
Melchiors, A. C., Correr, C. J., Venson, R., & Pontarolo, R. (2012). An analysis of quality of systematic reviews on pharmacist health interventions. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, 34(1), 32-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-011-9592-0
DOI
|
11 |
Moher, D., Cook, D. J., Eastwood, S., Olkin, I., Rennie, D., & Stroup, D. F. (1999). Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: The QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses. Lancet, 354(9193), 1896-1900.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
12 |
Papageorgiou, S. N., Papadopoulos, M. A., & Athanasiou, A. E. (2011). Evaluation of methodology and quality characteristics of systematic reviews in orthodontics. Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research, 14(3), 116-137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-6343.2011.01522.x
DOI
ScienceOn
|
13 |
Shea, B. J., Grimshaw, J. M., Wells, G. A., Boers, M., Andersson, N., Hamel, C., et al. (2007). Development of AMSTAR: A measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 7, 10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-7-10
DOI
|
14 |
Shea, B. J., Hamel, C., Wells, G. A., Bouter, L. M., Kristjansson, E., Grimshaw, J., et al. (2009). AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62(10), 1013-1020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.10.009
DOI
ScienceOn
|
15 |
Shin, C., Han, C., Pae, C. U., & Patkar, A. A. (2011). Tools for quality evaluation of clinical research reports. Korean Journal of Psychopharmacology, 22(2), 67-72.
|
16 |
Brown, S. J. (2013). Evidence-based nursing: The research-practice connection (3rd ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
|
17 |
Conn, V. S., & Rantz, M. J. (2003). Research methods: Managing primary study quality in meta-analyses. Research in Nursing & Health, 26(4), 322-333. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nur.10092
DOI
ScienceOn
|
18 |
Craig, J. V., & Smyth, R. L. (2007). The evidence-based practice manual for nurses (2nd ed.). Edinburgh, UK: Churchill Livingstone.
|
19 |
De Vito, C., Manzoli, L., Marzuillo, C., Anastasi, D., Boccia, A., & Villari, P. (2007). A systematic review evaluating the potential for bias and the methodological quality of meta-analyses in vaccinology. Vaccine, 25(52), 8794-8806. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.10.034
DOI
ScienceOn
|
20 |
Dijkman, B. G., Abouali, J. A., Kooistra, B. W., Conter, H. J., Poolman, R. W., Kulkarni, A. V., et al. (2010). Twenty years of meta-analyses in orthopaedic surgery: Has quality kept up with quantity? The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume, 92(1), 48-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.i.00251
DOI
ScienceOn
|
21 |
Egger, M., & Smith, G. D. (1998). Bias in location and selection of studies. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 316(7124), 61-66.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
22 |
Egger, M., Smith, G. D., & Altman, D. G. (2001). Systematic reviews in health care: Meta-analysis in context (2nd ed.). London, UK: BMJ Books.
|
23 |
Higgins, J. P. T., & Green, S. (2011, March). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0. Retrieved December 1, 2011, from www.cochrane-handbook.org
|
24 |
Kim, S. Y., Park, J. E., Seo, H. J., Lee, Y. J., Jang, B. H., Son, H. J., et al. (2011). NECA's guidance for undertaking systematic reviews and meta-analyses for intervention. Seoul: National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency.
|
25 |
Kjaergard, L. L., Villumsen, J., & Gluud, C. (2001). Reported methodologic quality and discrepancies between large and small randomized trials in meta-analyses. Annals of Internal Medicine, 135(11), 982-989.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
26 |
Leandro, G. (2005). Meta-analysis in medical research: The handbook for the understanding and practice of meta-analysis. Malden, MA: BMJ Books.
|
27 |
Lee, J. (2008). Meta-analysis. Journal of Korean Endocrine Society, 23(6), 361-378. http://dx.doi.org/10.3803/jkes.2008.23.6.361
DOI
ScienceOn
|
28 |
Simes, R. J. (1987). Confronting publication bias: A cohort design for metaanalysis. Statistics in Medicine, 6(1), 11-29.
DOI
ScienceOn
|