Browse > Article

Development of Standards and Criteria for Accreditation of a Baccalaureate Nursing Education Program: Reflections on the Unique Characteristics of the Nursing Profession  

Kim, Cho-Ja (College of Nursing, Yensei University)
Ahn, Yang-Heui (Department of Nursing, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine)
Kim, Mi-Won (Korean Accreditation Board of Nursing)
Jeong, Yeon-Ok (Korean Accreditation Board of Nursing)
Lee, Ju-Hee (University of Maryland School of Nursing)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing / v.36, no.6, 2006 , pp. 1002-1011 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine characteristics of nursing science and identify expected outcomes from baccalaureate graduates, and to develop accreditation standards and criteria reflecting the characteristics of the nursing profession. Methods: A methodological research design was utilized in this study. Related literature reviews and the nursing education program goals and objectives of the 99 nursing schools in Korea were analyzed. A cross-sectional survey research design was utilized to test the validity of the developed characteristics of the nursing profession and their accreditation criteria and standards. The face validity was from the advisory committee and public committee hearing. Results: The characteristics of nursing science were defined with five concepts including humanity, scientific knowledge, professionalism, therapeutic relationship, and facilitating well-being. The expected outcomes from graduates were identified as providing holistic nursing, critical thinking, establishing professionalism and leadership, construction of a therapeutic relationship, and skilled nursing practice. Finally6 standards and 14 criteria reflecting the unique characteristics of the nursing profession were developed for accreditation. These proposed accreditation standards and criteria are a challenge to promote the quality of nursing science.
Keywords
Nursing education; Baccalaureate; Accreditation;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education (CCNE) Accreditation (2004). Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education 2004. Retrieved December 11, 2004, from http;//www.aacn.nche.edu/Accreditation/checklist.htm
2 Fesler-Birch, D. M. (2005). Critical thinking and patient ourcomes: A review. Nurs Outlook, 53, 59-65   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Liaschenko, J., & Peter, E. (2004). Nursing ethics and conceptualizations of nursing : Profession, practice and work. J Advan Nurs, 46(5), 488-495   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Task Force on Accreditation of Health Professions Education (1999). Strategies for change and improvement. San Fransisco, California : Center for the Health Professions, University of California at San Francisco
5 Korean Nurses Association (2002). 2001 survey on nursing education programs. Seoul : Korean Nurses Association
6 Lee, J. S., & Lee, M. S. (2000). University accreditation and evaluation of medical education. Yonsei J Medi Edu, 2(1), 1-15
7 Ahn, Y. R. (2004). Critical thinking and the standards of nursing education. J Educ Eval Health Professions, 1(1), 99-106   DOI
8 National League for Nursing Accrediting Commission (2004). Accreditation manual 2004. Retrieved December 11, 2004, from http://www.nlnac.org/defaultl.htm
9 Ahn, Y. R., Park, K. S., Yang, S. O., Shin, K. R., & Kim, M. J. (2005). Development of standards and criteria for accreditation of baccalaureate nursing education program. J Educ Eval Health Professions, 2(1), 87-103   DOI
10 Yang Y. B. (2004). Problems of university evaluation and recommendations for improvement. Paper presented at the 1st workshop for evaluation committee members, Korean Association Board of Nursing, Seoul National University, Seoul
11 Bishop, A. H., & Scudder, J. R. (1999). A philosophical interpretation of nursing. Scholarly Inquiry for Nursing Practice. Sch Inq Nurs Pract, 13(1), 17-27
12 Korean Accreditation Board of Nursing (2003). Report on validity of accreditation for nursing education program. Seoul : Korean Nurses Association
13 Lee, M. S., & Kim, S. (1999). Clinical performance evaluation in nursing. Korean J Nurs Query, 8(1), 39-59
14 Korean Nurses Association. (1997). Standards of nursing education programs. Seoul : Korean Nurses Association
15 Bishop, A. H., & Scudder, J. R. (1997). A phenomenological interpretation of holistic nursing. J Holistic Nurs, 15(2), 103-111   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Kim, M. W. (2004). Development of objectives of nursing clinical education, based on the nursing core competency. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Yonsei University, Seoul
17 USA Nursing Knowledge Consensus Conference. (1998). Consensus statement on emerging nursing knowledge, 1998. Retrieved December 11, 2004, from http://www.bc.edu/bc_org/avp/son/theorist/roy.pdf
18 Korean Nurses Association (2004). Report on nursing standards development. Seoul : Korean Nurses Association
19 Bandman, E. L., & Bandman, B. (1995). Critical yhinking in nursing. Norwalk, Connecticut : Appleton & Lange
20 Zhang, Z., Luk, W., Arthur, D., & Wong, T. (2001). Nursing competencies : personal characteristics contributing to effective nursing performance. J Advan Nurs, 33(4), 467-474   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Oh, S. S. (2004). Characteristics of university evaluation and role of evaluation committee members. Paper presented at the 1st workshop for evaluation committee members, Korean Association Board of Nursing, Seoul National University, Seoul
22 American Association of Colleges of Nursing (1998). The essentials of baccalaureate education for professional nursing practice. Washington D.C. : American Association of Colleges of Nursing
23 Simpson, E., & Courtey, M. (2002). Critical thinking in nursing education : Literature review. Int J Nurs Pract, 8, 89-98   DOI   ScienceOn