A Review Study on the Strategies for Concept Analysis |
Yi Myung-Sun
(College of Nursing, Seoul National University & Researcher, The Research Institute of Nursing Science, Seoul National University)
Lee So-Woo (College of Nursing, Seoul National University & Researcher, The Research Institute of Nursing Science, Seoul National University) Kim Kum-Ja (Graduate School, Seoul National University) Kim Myo-Gyeong (Graduate School, Seoul National University) Kim Ji-Hyun (Graduate School, Seoul National University) Lee Kyung-Hee (Graduate School, Seoul National University) Lee In-Ok (Graduate School, Seoul National University) Lee Jung-Sook (Graduate School, Seoul National University) Hong Jeong-Hee (Graduate School, Seoul National University) |
1 | Meleis, A. I. (1985). Theoretical nursing: Development and progress (2nd Ed.). California : J. B. Lippincott |
2 | Morse, J. M., Hupcey, J. E., & Lenz, E. R. (1997). Choosing a strategy for concept analysis in nursing research: Moving beyond Wilson. In Gift, A. G.(l997). Clarifying concepts in nursing research (pp. 73-96). New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company |
3 | Rodgers, B. L. (1989). Concepts, analysis and the development of nursing knowledge: The evolutionary cycle. J Adv Nurs, 14, 330-335 DOI |
4 | Shih, F. J. (1998). Triangulation in nursing research: Issues of conceptual clarity and purpose. J Adv Nurs, 28(3), 631-641 DOI ScienceOn |
5 | Streubert, H. J., & Carpenter, D. R. (1999). Qualitative research in nursing: Advancing the humanistic imperative (2nd Ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott |
6 | Tripp-Reimer, T. (1984). Reconceptualizing the construct of health: Integrating emic and etic perspectives. Res Nurs Health, 7, 101-109 DOI ScienceOn |
7 | Warner, R. (1999). The emic and etics of quality of life assessment. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol, 34(3), 117-121 DOI |
8 | Bash, A. (2004). Spirituality: the emperor's new clothes?. J Clin Nurs, 13, 11-16 |
9 | Schwartz-Barcott, D., & Kim, H. S. (1986). Hybrid model for concept development. In P. L. Chinn (Ed.), Nursing research methodology: Issues and implementations. Rockville, MD: Aspen |
10 | Chinn, P. L., & Kramer, M. K. (1995). Theory and nursing. A systematic approach(4th ed.). St. Louis: Mosby |
11 | Fontana, J. S. (2004). A methodology for critical science in nursing. Advances in Nursing Science, 27(2), 93-101 DOI |
12 | Glass N., & Davis K. (2004). Reconceptualizing vulnerability; deconstruction and reconstruction as a postmodern feminist analytical research method. Advances in Nursing Science, 27(2), 82-92 DOI |
13 | Wuest, J. (1994). A feminist approach to concept analysis. West J Nurs Res, 16(5), 577-586 DOI ScienceOn |
14 | Lee, S. W., Kim, J. H., Lee, B. S., Lee, E. H., & Jung, M. S. (1997). Understanding of the nursing theory. Seoul: SooMoon Publishing |
15 | Morse, J. M. (2000) Exploring pragmatic utility: concept analysis by critically appraising the literature. In B. L. Rodgers & K. A. Knafl (2nd Ed), Concept development in nursing: Foundations, techniques, and applications (pp. 333-352). Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Co |
16 | Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? whose knowledge? Thinking from women's lives. New York: Cornell University Press |
17 | Ford-Gilboe, M., & Campbell, J. (1996). The mother-headed single-parent family: A feminist critique of the nursing literature. Nurs Outlook, 44, 173-83 DOI ScienceOn |
18 | Foss, C., & Ellefsen, B. (2002). The value of combing qualitative and quantitative approaches in nursing research by means of method triangulation. J Adv Nur, 40(2), 242-248 DOI ScienceOn |
19 | Lefler, L. L. (2004). Perceived risk of heart attack: A function of gender? Nursing Forum, 39(2), 18-26 |
20 | Cho, C. M., & Kim, B. H. (2000). Concept analysis about workers health, J Korean Acad Nurs, 30(2), 272-281 과학기술학회마을 DOI |
21 | Murphy, N., & Canales, M. (2001). A critical analysis of compliance. Nursing Inquiry, 8(3), 173- 181 DOI |
22 | Rodgers, B. L., & Knafl, K. A. (2000). Philosophical foundation of concept development. In B. L. Rodgers & K. A. Knafl (2nd Ed), Concept development in nursing: Foundations, techniques, and applications (pp. 7-37). Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Company |
23 | Morse, J. M., Mitcham, C., Hupcey, J. E., & Tason, M. C. (1996b). Criteria for concept evaluation. J Adv Nurs, 24, 385-390 DOI ScienceOn |
24 | Morse, J. M., Hupcey J. E, Mitcham, C., & Lenz, E. (1996). Concept analysis in nursing research: A critical appraisal. Scholarly Inquiry for Nursing Practice 10, 257-281 |
25 | Spiers, J. (2000). New perspectives on vulnerability using emic and etic approaches. J Adv Nurs, 31(3), 715-721 DOI ScienceOn |
26 | Walker, L. O., & Avant, K. C. (1995). Strateries for theory construction in nursing (3rd Ed.). Norwalk, CT: Appleton & Lange |
27 | Yi, M., & Yih, B. S. (2004). Feminism and qualitative nursing research. J Korean Acad Nurs, 34(3), 565-575 과학기술학회마을 DOI |
28 | Leeming, D., & Boyle, M. (2004). Shame as a social phenomenon: A critical analysis of the concept of dispositional shame. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 77, 375-396 |