Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3795/KSME-A.2006.30.11.1335

The Effects of Surface Energy and Roughness on Adhesion Force  

Rha, Jong-Joo (한국기계연구원 표면기술연구센터)
Kwon, Sik-Cheol (한국기계연구원 표면기술연구센터)
Jeong, Yong-Soo (한국기계연구원 표면기술연구센터)
Publication Information
Transactions of the Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers A / v.30, no.11, 2006 , pp. 1335-1347 More about this Journal
Abstract
Surface energies calculated from measured contact angles between several solutions and test samples, such as Si wafer, $Al_2O_3$, $SiO_2$, PTFE(Polytertrafluoroethylene), and DLC(Diamond Like Carbon) films, based on geometric mean method and Lewis acid base method. In order to relate roughness to adhesion force, surface roughness of test samples were scanned large area and small by AFM(Atomic Force Microscopy). Roughness was representative of test samples in large scan area and comparable with AFM tip radius in small scan area. Adhesion forces between AFM tip and test samples were matched well with order of roughness rather then surface energy. When AFM tips having different radius were used to measure adhesion force on DLCI film, sharper AFM tip was, smaller adhesion force was measured. Therefore contact area was more important factor to determine adhesion force.
Keywords
Contact Angle; Surface Energy; Surface Roughness; Adhesion Force; Tip Radius;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Suh, Nam P., 1986, Tribophysics, Prentice-Hall Press
2 Liu, E., Blanpain, B. and Ceils, J. P., 1996, Wear, Vol. 192, pp. 141-150   DOI
3 Garcia-Parajo, M., Longo, C., Servat, J., ？Gorostiza, P. and Sanz, F., 1997, Langmuir, Vol. 13, pp. 2333-2339   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Johnson, K. L., Kendall, K. and Roberts, A. D., 1971, Proc. Roy. Soc. London A, Vol. 324, pp. 301-313   DOI
5 Rabinovich, Y. I., Adler, J. J., Ata, A., Sing, R. K. and Moudgil, B. M., 2000, J. Collo. and Inter. Sci., Vol. 232, pp. 17-24   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Derjagui, B. V., Muller, V. M. and Toporov, Y. P., 1975, J. Collo. and Inter. Sci., Vol. 53, pp. 314-326   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Bharat Bhushan. 1999, Wear Vol. 225-229, pp. 465-492   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Robert W. Carpick, and Miquel Salmeron. ？1997, Chern. Rev. Vol. 97, pp. 1163-1194   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Beach, E. R., Tormoen, G. W., Drelich, J. and Han, R., 2002, J. Collo. and Inter. Sci., Vol. 247, pp. 84-99.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Rabinovich, Y. I., Adler, J. J., Ata, A., Sing, R. K. and Moudgil, B. M., 2000, J. Collo. and Inter. Sci., Vol. 232, pp. 10-16   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Yee, Y., Chun, K., Lee, J. D. and Kim, C. J., 1996, Sensors and Actuators A, Vol. 52, pp. 145-150.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Israelachvili, J. N. and Tabor, D., 1972, Proc. Roy. Soc. London A, Vol. 331, pp. 19-38   DOI
13 Zizrnan, W. A., 1963, Advances in Chemical Series, Vol. 28, pp. 1-50
14 Trojan, K., Grischke, M. and Dirnigen, H., 1994, Phys. stat. sol. (a), Vol. 145, pp. 575-585   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Balkenende, A. R., A.P., H. J., van de Boogaard, Scholten, M. and Willard, N.P., 1998, Langmuir, Vol. 14, pp. 5907-5912   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Fuller, K. N. G. and Tabor, D., 1975, Proc. Roy. Soc. London A, Vol. 345, pp. 327-342   DOI
17 Yufeng, L. and Menon, A. K., 1995, Trans. ASME. J. Tribology, Vol. 117, pp. 279-284   DOI
18 Alley, R. L., Mai, P., Komvopoulos, K. and Howe, R. T., 1993, Proc. Transducer '93, Yokohama, Japan, 7-10 June, pp. 288-291
19 Roya Maboudian, and Roger Howe, T. 1997, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 1-20   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Ando, Y. and Ino, J., 1996, Sensors and Actuators A, Vol. 57, pp. 83-89   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Bradley K. Smith, Jeffry J. Sniegowski, Glenn LaVigne, and Craig Brown, 1998, Sensors and Actuators A, Vol. 70, pp. 159-163   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Roya Maboudian, 1998, Surface Science Reports, Vol. 30, pp. 207-269   DOI   ScienceOn