Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5659/JAIK.2021.37.1.87

Development of Evaluation System for Universal Design Environment as the User-Oriented Perspective  

Park, Cheong-Ho (Korea Universal Design Association)
Publication Information
Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea / v.37, no.1, 2021 , pp. 87-94 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study is a follow-up to the work of developing quantitative evaluation indicators for universal design, and the purpose was to develop a user-oriented evaluation system unlike preceding research focused on experts. To this end, the study was conducted using 5-principles, 15-components, and 14-user types as a result of the previous research. As a result of the AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) analysis, the disabled showed high weighted values focusing on convenience and safety, while The disadvantaged person to mobility and the person not disadvantageous to mobility showed high weighted values centered on safety in 5-principles. It is seems to be caused by the difference between the disabled and the non-disabled. The disabled, the disadvantaged person to mobility, and he person not disadvantageous to mobility showed high importance in safety and convenience, while the experts showed high importance in equity and safety. This has led to confirmation that there are different perspectives between users and professionals. For the 15-components to be used as user-oriented evaluation indicators, user groups and experts showed contrasting forms for the weighted values of convenient space & materials, low physical effort, and maintainability. In addition, the degree of importance of users has been significantly higher for safety and crime prevention. As a result, it reaffirmed that there is a gap between users and experts. Based on the above results, this study presented evaluation indicators and score reflecting the results of the difference in a global weighted value for 3-user groups, and it is meaningful as the first step in transitioning to a quantitative evaluation system that reflects the user's view of maintaining the concept of universal design.
Keywords
Universal Design; principles; User Centered Desgin; Analytic Hierarchy Process; Evaluation System;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Gu, S. H., & Yoo, Y. H. (2012). Methodological Implications of AHP for Universal Design Evaluation Method. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 12(7), 138-146.   DOI
2 Ha, M. K., & Je, H. S. (1997). A Study on the Direction of Applying Universal Design on Buildings and Facilities in Korea. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design, 13(5), 107-115.
3 Jonathan, Hill. (2003). Actions of Architecture: Architects and Creative Users, 1st ed., London, Routledge, 28.
4 Ko, K. K., & Ha, H. Y. (2008). Meta Analysis of the Utilization of Analytic Hierarchy Process for Policy Studies in Korea. The Korea Association for Policy Studies, 17(1), 287-315.
5 Kevin Lynch. (1960). The Image of the City. 1st ed., Massachusetts. The MIT Press, 2-13.
6 Lee, Y. S. (2005). Universal Design. 1st ed., Seoul, Yonsei University Press, 12, 20-21.
7 Lee, J. E. (2000). Evaluation of Application for Universal Design Principles to Public Environment. master's thesis, Yonsei University.
8 Lee, M. A. (2017). A Study of Servicescape Power Index Based on Spatial User Experience Design. Ph.D. Dissertation, Hongik University.
9 Park, C. H., & Seong, K. C. (2020). Analysis of Priority Recognition Patterns in Public Space for the Application of Universal Design to the Disabled and the Non-Disabled, and Expert, Design Convergence Study, 19(6), 101-126.   DOI
10 Park, C. H., & Woo, C. Y. (2020). A Study on the Evaluation System of Universal Design Space Environment Using Weighted Values of Universal Design Principles, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design, 36(11), 85-92.
11 Seol, Y. D. (2020). A Study on the Development of Value-Oriented Universal Design Evaluation System. master's thesis, Hongik University.
12 Steinfeld, E., & Maisel, J. (2012). Universal design: creating inclusive environments. 1st ed., New Jersey, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 29, 35-36.
13 Yoon, M. H., & Kim, S. W. (2014). Universal Design Evaulation on the Anyang Stream Waterfront Design. Journal of Digital Design, 14(1), 591-602.   DOI
14 http://www.design.ncsu.edu/cud (Center for Universal Design)
15 Shin, S. S. (2010). A study on the architectural design for the user-oriented multi-layered publicness. Ph.D. Dissertation, Seoul National University.