Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5659/AIKAR.2019.21.3.79

Past and Present Viable Pavilions Remain in Architecture: Envisioning New Directions for a Better Future Research on pavilions within the history of world fairs, from the mid-19th to the 21st Century  

Shim, Sodahm Suzanne (Department of Architecture, Ewha Womans University)
Lee, Yoonhie (Department of Architecture, Ewha Womans University)
Yoon, Chaeshin (Department of Architecture, Ewha Womans University)
Publication Information
Architectural research / v.21, no.3, 2019 , pp. 79-90 More about this Journal
Abstract
The ephemeral and temporal nature of pavilions is the underlying motivation that led to the development of this paper. From the beginning of the industrial era through contemporary history, there have been many instances of architects attempting to rethink architectural design in the context of modern social, cultural, and technical imperatives. Today, the leading changes in humanity are accompanied by a revolutionary electronic digital medium. The pavilion has been in an amalgamation of architectural integration since the beginning of human history. World's Fairs/Expos have, since their establishment, served as international presentations of goods and achievements of particular nations. They became a popular stage wherein potential architectural achievements were showcased through the evocative architecture of pavilions. Due to the pavilion's "temporary nature," its coverage includes various perspectives: social, historical, geographical, post-colonial, iconographical, temporal, and ephemeral. It has also served as a receptacle due to its representational value at a given time. The pavilion has offered architectural designers, clients, and visitors a place to use their imaginations. Moreover, the architect's role in creating pavilions cannot be overestimated. Due to fact that they abound in symbolism, contemporary designs, and innovative solutions, pavilions often mirror modern mankind and plan for the next aesthetic revolutions and ideological architectural theories. To understand and appreciate architects' original intentions with their pavilions, this paper focuses on noteworthy pavilions that were created from the beginning of industrialization through the present. It explores and discusses the pavilion's characteristics, highlights the significance of its physical form as generated by a specific theme.
Keywords
Pavilion; Temporality; Transformative; World Fairs; Urban Art-Architecture Installation;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Andrews, Peter Alford (1980). The Felt Tent in Middle Asia. University of London.
2 Calney, Mark (2006). The International Centennial Exhibition of 1876. American Patriot History Project.
3 Cimadevilaa, Javier Estevez and Cesarb, Isaac Lopez (2015). The Palais des Machines of 1889, Historical-structural reflections. Universidade da Coruna, VLC arquitectura v2(2): 1-30.   DOI
4 Clarke, Joseph (2012). Iannis Xenakis and the Philips Pavilion. The Journal of Architecture, 17:2, 213-229.   DOI
5 Coles, Alex (2007). Art, design, architecture: PAVILIONS. Whitechapel and MIT Press, Art Monthly / 308.
6 Corn, Wanda M. (2011). Women Building History: Public Art at the 1893 Columbia Exposition. University of California Press.
7 Drew, Philip (2006). A CONUNDRUM IN TIME: Medieval and Modern Pavilions. Architectural Theory Review, 11:2, 53-65.   DOI
8 Foster, Hal (2011). Art-Architecture Complex. Verso, London.
9 Findling, John E. and Pelle, Kimberly D. (2008). Encyclopedia of World's Fairs and Expositions. McFarland & Company, Inc., Jefferson, North Carolina and London.
10 Bergdoil, Barry (2013). The Pavilion and the Expanded Possibilities of Architecture. DETAIL, n6.
11 Gossel, Peter and Leuthauser, Gabriele (2012). Architecture in the 20th Century. Taschen.
12 Gutschow, Kai K. (2006). From Object to Installation in Bruno Taut's Exhibit Pavilions. Carnegie Mellon University, Journal of Architectural Education, 63-70.
13 Jodidio, Philip (2005). Piano Complete Works. TASCHEN.
14 Kaltenbach, Frank (2015). Expo Milano 2015-Superficial Entertainment or Global Think Tank. DETAIL, n5.
15 Kretschmer, Winfried (1999). History of World Expositions. Frankfurt.
16 Madrazo, Leandro (1994). Durand and the Science of Architecture. Journal of Architectural Education 48(1).
17 Nielsen, David and Kumarasuriyar, Anoma (2014). The lily, client and measure of Bruno Taut’s Glashaus. Architectural Research Quarterly, 18(3), 257-266.   DOI
18 Nielsen, David (2012). Client intentions and Bruno Taut's Glashaus. Queensland University of Technology.
19 Nightingale, Virginia and Dwyer, Tim (2007). New Media World-Challenges for Convergence. Oxford University.
20 Stamper, John W. (1989). The Galerie des Machines of the 1889 Paris World's Fair. Technology & Culture, 30(2).
21 Udovicki-Selb, Danilo (1997). Le Corbusier and the Paris Exhibition of 1937. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, 56(1).
22 Linden, Gorden and Creighton, Paul (2008). The Expo Book. Gordon Linden.
23 Moonan, Wendy (2007). German Design for an Industrial Age. The New York Times Company.
24 Unknown Author (2000). Architectural Review, Hanover 2000. EMAP Construct, v208, n1243, 42-81.
25 Giberti, Bruno (2002). Designing the Centennial. The University Press of Kentucky, Lexington.
26 Seoul exhibition puts Korean architect Minsuk Cho in the spotlight (2014) http://www.dezeen.com/2014/11/24
27 Publication (2015) http://farminarchitecture.org/12097513