Browse > Article

A Brief Sketch of Architectural Works Copyright with the United States Cases: Analysis based on Thomas Shine v. David M. Childs and Skidmore Owings & Merrill, LLP Case  

Moon, Hwakyung (Department of Architecture, Graduate School of Ewha Womans University)
Publication Information
Architectural research / v.9, no.1, 2007 , pp. 1-8 More about this Journal
Abstract
These days the copyright plays a significant role in various fields of creative works and it has expanded dramatically into unprecedented ways. In Korea, architectural works copyright cases are rare due to the lack of information and understanding of the architectural works copyright. Architectural works copyright can promote architects' creative activities and enhance the quality of architectural works as art. Nevertheless, there is little effort to advance the studies of architectural works copyright in the architectural design area. Under these circumstances, this research attempts to share the basic case laws and remedies for various architectural works copyright issues in the U.S. cases. This Article examines the Thomas Shine v. David M. Childs and Skidmore Owings & Merrill, LLP Case which is the most recent case as I could reach. This case is about a story between two architects, one is from a very prestigious architectural design firm and the other, once Yale Architectural student, now practices his design work as an up-and-coming architect. A close examination of this case will provide a legal and architectural spectrum of copyright. That is, it will make it more specific how to solve the copyright infringement. Artistic and technological contexts are overlapped in Architectural works copyright as its inherent characteristics. Therefore, different ways from other copyrighted works are needed to access the untangled equations of the architectural works copyright protection. In addition, more comprehensible and specific regulations that can impose a remedy more suited to the architectural works copyright violations are needed and they should enable architects to fulfill their architectural activities under wide range of copyright protection. Moreover, in prior to all efforts to handle those equations, fundamental knowledge of architectural works copyright is required to improve the copyright protection in the architectural design area as well as to provide for the globalizing design practice. Ultimately, all of these efforts will be rewarded when constant researches based on Korean and other countries' architectural copyright cases can support them and it would be great if this research can set the stage for resolving expected copyright conflicts within the architectural design area.
Keywords
Architectural Design; Architectural Works; Copyrights; Intellectual Property Rights; Infringement;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Bryan A. Garner(Editor in Chief), Black's Law Dictionary, West, a Thomson business, 2004
2 Architectural Record, MANTORS: Since 1990, architectural works, whether buildings, plans, or drawings, have been protected under copyright law, Architectural Record, Volume 189; Issue 11, 2003
3 Jon O. Newman, New Lyrics for an Old Melody: The Idea/Expression Dichotomy in the Computer Age, 17 Cardozo Arts & Ent. L.J. 691, 1999
4 Attia v. Society of New York Hospital, 201 F.3d 50 (1999)
5 Sparaco v. Lawler, Matusky, Skelly Engineers, 313 F.Supp.2d 247 (2004)
6 Architecture & Urban Research Information Center http://www.auric.or.kr
7 Korea Institute of Registered Architects http://www.kira.or.kr.
8 U.S. Copyright Office http://www.copyright.gov.
9 Thomas Shine v. David M. Childs and Skidmore Owings & Merrill, LLP, 382 F.Supp.2d 602 (2005)
10 Robert Burrell, Allison Coleman, Copyright Exceptions: The Digital Impact, Cambridge University Press, 2005
11 Julian Conrad Juergensmeyer, Thomas E. Roberts, Land Use Planning and Development Regulation Law, Thomson West, 2003
12 Demetriades v. Kaufmann, 690 F.Supp. 289, 295 (S.D.N.Y.1988)
13 Bleistein v. Donaldson Lithographing Co., 188 U.S. 239 (1903)
14 Supreme Court of Korea http://scourt.go.kr.
15 Burton C. Allyn, IV, The Architectural Works Copyright Protection Act of 1990, http://www.aepronet.org/pn/vol5- no2.html#one#one
16 Lawrence Lessig, CODE and other laws of cyberspace, Basic Books, 1999
17 Lower Manhattan Development Corporation http://www.renewnyc.org/default.aspx. http://www.wtcsitememorial.org/index.html.
18 Westlaw http://westlaw.com.
19 Lawrence Lessig, Free Culture, The Penguin Press, 2004
20 Korea Ministry of Government Legislation http://www.moleg.go.kr.
21 Architectural Institute of Korea http://www.aik.or.kr.
22 Folio Impressions, Inc. v. Byer California, 937 F.2d 759, 764-65 (2d Cir.1991)