Browse > Article

A Study on the Definition of the Term "Tectonics" in Architecture  

Kim, Ran Soo (Georgia Institute of Technology)
Publication Information
Architectural research / v.8, no.2, 2006 , pp. 17-26 More about this Journal
Abstract
This paper attempts to identify the term "tectonics" comprehensively by collecting and categorizing existing definitions of tectonics within the architectural area rather than to stress the concept of tectonics of each specific theorist. Although no consensus of opinion on the concept of tectonics exists, architectural tectonics was closely related to the following terms in three categories: 1. $techn\acute{e}$, technique, and technology; 2. construction and structure; and 3. stereotomics. Based on its etymology, system, and material construct, the notion of tectonics common in these three categories signifies "the art of framing construction," in which linear elements are connected with joints and clad or infilled with lightweight material. Thus, the art of framing construction, as a common concept of tectonics, reveals the following characteristics: First, tectonics is based on framing construction in contrast to piling-up construction as the etymology of tectonics signifies the art of carpentry. Then, the term tectonics, dealing as it does with a higher level of construction rather than the mechanical level of structure, incorporates the poetic aspect of techne as well as the rational aspect of technology. Third, Owing to the organic, double system of tectonic frame and incrusting or infilling materials, the tectonic body becomes both the ornament and the structure simultaneously. As the art of framing construction is based on material construction rather than structural or ornamental form, this paper proposes that one can view tectonics as a term that conveys the meaning of the actual material effect on space.
Keywords
Tectonics; Stereotomics; $Techn\acute{e}$; Structure; the Art of Framing Construction;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Anderson, S. (1980) 'Modern Architecture and Industry:Peter Behrens, the AGE, and Industrial Design.' Opposition 21: 79-97
2 Behne, A. (1922) 'Art, Handicraft, Technology. Translated by Diane Blaurock.' In Francesco Dal Co.1980. 'The Remoteness of die Moderne.' Oppositions 22: 96-104
3 Frampton, K. (1990) 'Rappel a l'ordre, the Case for the Tectonic.' In Theorizing a New Agenda for Architecture. 1996. ed. Kate Nesbitt, 516-528.New York: Princeton Architecture Press
4 Heidegger, M. (1971) Poetry, Language, Thought, Trans. and intro. Albert Hofstadter. New York: Harper & Row
5 Heidegger, M (1977) The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays. Trans. and intro. William Lovitt. New York: Harper & Row
6 Noberg-Schulz, C. (1976) 'The Phenomenon of Place.' In Theorizing a New Agenda for Architecture. ed. Kate N. (1996), 412-428. New York: Princeton Architecture Press
7 Porphyrios, D. (2002) 'From Techne to Tectonics.' In What is Architecture? ed. Andrew Ballantyne, 129-137. London, New York: Routledge
8 Schwarzer, M. (1993) 'Ontology and Representation in Karl Botticher's Theory of Tectonics.' Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians 52 (September): 267-280   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Sekler, E. (1965) 'Structure, Construction, and Tectonics.' In Structure in Art and in Science. ed. Gyorgy Kepes, 89-95. New York: George Braziller
10 Street, G. (1874) Brick and Marble in the Middle Ages, London: J. Murray
11 Forty, A. (2000) Words and Buildings-A Vocabulary of Modern Architecture. New York: Thames and Hudson
12 Frampton, K. (1995) Studies in Tectonic Culture: the Poetics of Construction in Nineteenth and Twentieth Century Architecture. Cambridge: The MIT Press
13 Schwarzer, M. (1995) German Architectural Theory and the Search for Modern Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
14 Semper, G. (1989) The Four Elements of Architecture and Other Writings, Trans. Harry F. Mallgrave. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
15 Valhonrat, C. (1988) 'Tectonic Considered, Between the Presence and the Abstract of Artifice.' Perspecta 24: 122-135   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Frampton, K. (2002) 'Bötticher, Semper and the Tectonic:Core Form and Art Form.' In What is Architecture? ed. Andrew Ballantyne, 138-152. London, New York:Routledge
17 Van de Ven, C (1978) Space in Architecture: the Evolution of a New Idea in the Theory and History of the Modern Movements. Amsterdam: Van Gorcum Assen
18 Meagher, R. (1988) Techne. Perspecta. 24: 159-166
19 Ford, E. (1990) The Details of Modern Architecture. Cambridge: MIT Press
20 Hartoonian, G. (1994) Ontology of Construction-On Nihilism of Technology in Theories of Modern Architecture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
21 Semper, G. (2004) Style in the Technical and Tectonic Arts, or, Practical Aesthetics. Trans. Harry Francis Mallgrave and Michael Robinson. Los Angeles: Getty Research Institute
22 Valhonrat, C. (2000) 'The In-Visibility of Tectonics:Gravity and the Tectonic Compacts.' Perspecta .31:22-35   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Moravansky, A. (1996) The Language of Materials in Architecture: 'ruth to Material'vs 'he Principle of Cladding.' AA Files 31 (Summer): 39-46
24 Noberg-Schulz, C. (2000) Principles of Modern Architecture. London: Andreas Papadakis Publisher
25 Guisado, A. (1997) 'The Dematerialization of the Wall, an Evolution of Tectonic.' Arquitectura 310: 116-119
26 Alberti, L. (1988) On the Art of Building in Ten Books, trans. Joseph Rykwert. Cambridge: MIT Press
27 Herrmann, W. (1984) Gottfried Semper: In Search of Architecture. Cambridge: MIT Press
28 Herrmann, W. (1992) In What Style Should We Build?: The German Debate on Architectural Style. Santa Monica: the Getty Center for the History of Art and the Humanities
29 Sanabria, L. (1989) 'From Gothic to Renaissance Stereotomy: the Design Methods of Philbert de l'Orme and Alonso de Vandelvira.' Technology and Culture 30: 266-299   DOI