Browse > Article

The Effect of Office Layouts and Ambient Office Sounds on the Simple Tasks of White Collar Workers  

Yoon, Heakyung Cecilia (Department of Architecture, Carnegie Mellon University)
Publication Information
Architectural research / v.8, no.2, 2006 , pp. 11-16 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to scrutinize the effect of office layouts and ambient office sounds on the performance of office workers involved with a proof-reading test (simple task). Twenty subjects, who were professional researchers and computer programmers, were from three different office layouts: 1) Nine subjects from a combined office type with open meeting places and closed individual offices; 2) five from an open office with rectangular individual workstations, and 3) six from an open office with triangular individual workstations. Architects and consultants working in the field of office have reported from interviews and their own observations that occupants' satisfaction differs as their office layouts vary although the sizes are the same. This finding leads to the hypothesis of this experiment. Proof-reading test results were obtained from three different office layouts (combined office type, rectangular and triangular individual workstations in open offices) under two different sound conditions (quiet background sound and ambient sound of their own workplace) for 10 minutes. The test analysis shows the mean test score of subjects from the triangular individual workstations in open offices is significantly different from the mean test scores of subjects from the combined office type and the rectangular individual workstations in open offices.
Keywords
Office Layout; Performance; Simple Task; Office Sounds;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 American Society of Interior Design, Armstrong World Industries, Inc., Dynasound, Inc., Miliken & Co., Steelcase Inc. (1996). Sound Solutions: Increasing Office Productivity Through Integrated Acoustic Planning And Noise Reduction Strategies. 608 Massachusetts Avenue, NE, Washington, D.C. 20002-
2 Banbury, S., & Berry, D. C. (1998). Disruption of officerelated tasks by speech and office noise. British Journal of Psychology, 89(3), 499-517   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Sundstrom, E., Town, J. P., Rice, R. W., Osborn, D. P., & et al. (1994). Office noise, satisfaction, and performance. Environment & Behavior, 26(2), 195-222   DOI   ScienceOn
4 American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc. (2001). Handbook Fundamentals SI Edition 2001, Chapter 7. Sound and Vibration. (2001). 1791 Tullie Circle, N.E., Atlanta, GA 30329: American Society of Heating Refrigerating and Air-conditioning Engineers
5 Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge : how organizations manage what they know. In L. P. Thomas H. Davenport (Ed.) (pp. 88-106). Boston Mass: Harvard Business School Press
6 Test Method PBS-C.1: Method for the direct measurement of Speech-Privacy potential (SPP) Based on subjective judgments. (1978). Washington, DC 20405: Public Building Service in the General Service Administration
7 Horgen, T. H., Joroff, M. L., Porter, W. L., & Schon, D. A. (1999). Excellence by design : transforming workplace and work practice. 605 Third Avenue, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc
8 ASTM6E 1130-02. (2002). Standard Test Method for Objective Measurement of Speech Privacy in Open Offices Using Articulation Index (ASTM E 1130-02). New York: American National Standards Institute, Acoustical Society of America
9 Behar, A., & Mallette, R. (1987, June 8-10). A Pilot Study on Office Noise. Paper presented at the NOISE-CON
10 Test Method PBS-C.2: Public Building Service standard method of test method for the sufficient verification of Speech-Privacy potential (SPP) Based on objective measurements including methods for the rating of functional interzone attenuation and NC-background. (1975). Washington, DC 20405: Public Building Service in the General Service Administration
11 De Chiara, J., & Crosbie, M. J. (2001). Time-saver standards for building types (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill
12 Genuit, K. (1994, May 01-04). Possibilities of Psychoacoustics to Determine Sound Quality. Paper presented at the NOISE-CON
13 Cavanaugh, W. J., & Wilkes, J. A. (1998). Architectural acoustics: Principles and Practice. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc