Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5659/JAIK_PD.2018.34.12.135

Dialectical Interpretation regarding the Concept of Preservation and Restoration - With a focus on Eugène-Emmanuel Viollet-le-Duc, John Ruskin, and Camillo Boito -  

Kim, Tae-Hyung (한국전통문화대학교 문화재수리기술학과)
Kim, Young-Jae (한국전통문화대학교 문화재수리기술학과)
Publication Information
Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design / v.34, no.12, 2018 , pp. 135-144 More about this Journal
Abstract
This paper deals with preservation and restoration as a universal approach to conserve architectural heritage. The questions on how to preserve or restore them have been always major issues for many old buildings. Reading changes in ways of the thinking to solve such matters in the past helps to grasp the fundamental concepts to conserve cultural heritage at this point in time. The method is an important stage that leads to change our current attitude. Both the ways of the thinking for preservation and restoration should be re-interpreted to preserve memory or to restore identity depending on the current situation, and even should no longer be understood as two opposite options. Therefore, this paper focuses on the epistemological notion and reveals the origin and premise of modern historical perception that has become disconnected from the past works. By taking the writings of $Eug{\grave{e}}ne$-Emmanuel Viollet le Duc, John Ruskin, and Camillo Boito into consideration, the thesis shows that their thought, in the common denominator of the time, is a kind of reflection of consciousness according to particular historical contexts and that their ideas echo three dialectical paradigms derived from past and present, memory and forgetfulness, and history and truth.
Keywords
Historical Epistemology; Conservation; Restoration; $Eug{\grave{e}}ne$-Emmanuel Viollet-le-Duc; Johm Ruskin; Camillo Boito;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Boito, Camillo. (1893). Conserver ou restaurer : les dilemmes du patrimoine, Editions de l'Imprimeur, 23, 34-38, 100.
2 Choay, Francoise. (1992). L'allegorie du patrimoine, Seuil, 32, 36, 37, 60, 66, 100.
3 E. M. Viollet. le-duc. (1854). Dictionnaire raisonnee de l'architecture francaise du XIeme au XVIeme siecle, 1854-1868, B. Bance-paris, 14-16, 31.
4 Le-Goff, Jacques. (1988). Histoire et memoire, Gallimard, 25-33, 50, 59.
5 Gadamer, Hans-Georg, (1996). Veerite et methode les grandes lignes d'une hermeneutique philosophique, Editions du Seuil, 175, 185-187.
6 Hilde Heynen. (1999). Architecture and Modernity, MIT press, 2-12.
7 Jokilehto, Jukka. (1999). A History of Architectural Conservation, Butterworth-Heinemann series in conservation and museology, Oxford, UK, Butterworth-Heinemann, vii. 174.
8 Marcel Proust. (1900). John Ruskin, Gazette des Beaux-arts, 135-146.
9 Longstreth, Richard. (2016). "Preservation toward Conservation," Bending the Future: Fifty Ideas for the Next Fifty Years of Historic Preservation in the United States, Max, Page and Marla R. Miller. eds. University of Massachusetts Press, 144-147.
10 Philippot, Paul. (1989). Histoire et actualite de la restauration.
11 Ruskin, John. (1912). Les sept lampes de l'architecture, Les Presses d'aujourd'hui, xvi-xvii, 9, 196-198, 205, 249-250.
12 Ruskin, John. (1983). Les Pierres de Venise, Paris: Gallimard.
13 Ruskin, John. (1901). Unto This Last: Four essays on the first principles of political economy, George Allen, Vol. 623.