Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5659/JAIK_PD.2014.30.9.57

Study on Intermediary Agency's Operating Characteristics of Neighborhood Regeneration Governance Types - Focused on Tokyo, Birmingham, Boston case study -  

Yeo, Hae-Jin (건축도시공간연구소)
Publication Information
Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design / v.30, no.9, 2014 , pp. 57-65 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to explore the intermediary agency's operating characteristics in the three typologies of neighborhood regeneration governance. Case study is focused on Japan, UK, and US's related legal system, planning system, and intermediary agencies activities. Case Study is composed of regeneration type with public-led, semi-public-led, and neighborhood-led. Individual case shows distinguishing roles of intermediary agency governing neighborhood regeneration governance; government-affiliated organizations for Setagaya Machizukuri in Tokyo, non-departmental public body for Castle Vale project in Birmingham, and strong partnership of community organization with local foundation for Dudley Street Neighborhood Initiative in Boston. Policy implications are as follows; first, intermediary agency has an important role for structuring governance, which is vertically engaging public sector with community organizations and horizontally engaging various local agencies. Second, in the early stage of neighborhood regeneration, public-led intermediary agencies are reliable but need to develop the governance framework for more neighborhood-led governance. Third, it is critical to set up community business belong to neighborhood-led governance for sustainable regeneration.
Keywords
Neighborhood Regeneration; Governance; Participation; Intermediary Agency;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Stoker, G., The New Management of British Local Governance, London: Macmillan, 1999
2 Yang, K. and Callahan, K., Citizen Involvement Efforts and Bureaucratic Responsiveness: Participatory Values, Stake holder Pressures, and Administrative Practicality, Public A dministration Review, 67, 2007
3 신중진 외, 마을만들기 사업에서 주민의 역할변화에 따른 지원방안 연구, 건축학회지, 26(10), 2010   과학기술학회마을
4 신중진 외, 주민참여에 의한 문화.역사마을가꾸기 사업에서 참여주체의 관계구도와 역할에 관한 연구, 건축학회지, 23(2), 2007   과학기술학회마을
5 양도식, 도시재생정책의 실체, 국토연구원, 2013
6 여혜진, 중소도시 쇠퇴지역 재생정책 합리화를 위한 근린단위 연구, 건축도시공간연구소, 2013
7 이승종, 미국 지방정부 정책과정에서의 주민참여기제, 한국정치학회보, 31(4), 1997
8 이영환, 점진적 주거지 정비사업에서 코디네이터 조직의 필요성, LHI People, 2013(7), 2013
9 임기택, 영국 도시재생 파트너쉽의 클러스터화 과정에 관한 연구, 건축학회지, 26(5), 2010
10 하성규, 커뮤니티 주도적 재개발의 새로운 접근, 도시행정학보, 19(2), 2006
11 황희연, 도시정비 참여주체와 주민참여지원센터의 역할, 건축학회지, 51(9), 2007
12 世田谷區, 都市整備方針, 2005.4
13 Hooghe, L. and Marks G., Types of Multi-Level Governance and European Integration, Rowman & Littlefield, 2001
14 Eliassen, K. and Kooiman, J., Modern Governance, London: Sage, 1993
15 Medoff, P. and Sklar, H., Streets of Hope: The Fall and Rise of an Urban Neighborhood, South End Press, 1999
16 Oxford City Council, "A Regeneration Framework for Oxford to 2026.", www.oxfordpartnership.org.uk
17 Rhodes, R., The New Governance: Governing without Government, Political Studies, 44, 1996
18 노정민 외, 주거지 재생사업에서 일상활동과 계획활동의 사회적 자본에의 영향관계 분석, 국토도시계획학회지, 48(6), 2013
19 Rhodes, R. and Rhodes, F., Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexity and Accountability, Philadelphia: Open University Press, 1997
20 김우락, 주거지정비사업에서 협력적 거버넌스 구축이 사회적 자본형성에 미치는 영향, 국토계획학회지, 46(4), 2011
21 서수정 외, 해피하우스 센터의 역할과 과제, 도시와 빈곤, 95권, 2011