Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5653/cerm.2021.04651

Progress in human ovarian rejuvenation: Current platelet-rich plasma and condensed cytokine research activity by scope and international origin  

Sills, E. Scott (Plasma Research Section, FertiGen CAG/Regenerative Biology Group)
Wood, Samuel H. (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Palomar Medical Center)
Publication Information
Clinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicine / v.48, no.4, 2021 , pp. 311-315 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objective: As clinicians and patients await consensus on intraovarian platelet-rich plasma (PRP) treatment, this project evaluated contemporary research trends in the literature. Methods: A PubMed/NLM search aggregated all ovarian PRP-related publications (n=54) to evaluate their scope, abstract utility, submission-to-publication interval, journal selected, article processing charge (APC), free reader access to full-text manuscripts, number and nationality of authors, and inclusion of international collaborators. The NIH Clinical Trials database was also audited. Results: Published output on intraovarian PRP has increased consistently since 2016, especially among investigators in Greece, Iran, USA, and Turkey. Between 2013 and 2021, 42 articles met the relevancy criteria, of which 40.5% reported clinical studies, small series, or case reports, 33% described experimental animal models, and 23.8% were opinion/review papers. Only two works included a placebo control group. The submission-to-publication interval (mean±standard deviation) was 130±96 days, there were 5.9±3.2 authors per project, and journals invoiced US $1,613±1,466 (range, $0-$3,860) for APCs. Conclusion: There was no correlation between APC and time to publish (Pearson's r=-0.01). Abstract content was inconsistent; sample size and patient age were often missing, yet free full-text "open access" was available for most publications (59.5%). The NIH Clinical Trials portal lists eight registered studies on "ovarian rejuvenation," of which two are actively recruiting patients, while four have been terminated or have an uncertain status. Two studies have concluded, with results from one posted to the NIH website. PRP and its derivatives for ovarian treatment show early promise, but require further investigation. Research is accelerating and should be encouraged, particularly placebo-controlled randomized clinical trials.
Keywords
Fertility; Menopause; Ovary; Platelet-rich plasma; Research;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Pantos K, Nitsos N, Kokkali G, Vaxevanoglou T, Markomichali C, Pantou A, et al. Ovarian rejuvenation and folliculogenesis reactivation in peri-menopausal women after autologous platelet-rich plasma treatment. Hum Reprod 2016;(Suppl 1):P-401.
2 Sills ES. The scientific and cultural journey to ovarian rejuvenation: background, barriers, and beyond the biological clock. Medicines (Basel) 2021;8:29.   DOI
3 Zhang J, Han L, Shields L, Tian J, Wang J. A PRISMA assessment of the reporting quality of systematic reviews of nursing published in the Cochrane Library and paper-based journals. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019;98:e18099.   DOI
4 Bahadur G, Homburg R. Growing body of evidence supports intrauterine insemination as first line treatment and rejects unfounded concerns about its efficacy, risks and cost effectiveness. JBRA Assist Reprod 2019;23:62-7.
5 Evers JL. Do we need an RCT for everything? Hum Reprod 2017;32:483-4.   DOI
6 Braakhekke M, Mol F, Mastenbroek S, Mol BW, van der Veen F. Equipoise and the RCT. Hum Reprod 2017;32:257-60.   DOI
7 Rodrigues RS, Abadal E, de Araujo BK. Open access publishers: the new players. PLoS One 2020;15:e0233432.   DOI