Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5653/cerm.2016.43.2.102

Evidence for obtaining a second successive semen sample for intrauterine insemination in selected patients: results from 32 consecutive cases  

Ortiz, Alejandra (Human Reproduction Unit, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile)
Ortiz, Rita (Human Reproduction Unit, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile)
Soto, Evelyn (Human Reproduction Unit, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile)
Hartmann, Jonathan (Urology Department, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile)
Manzur, Alejandro (Human Reproduction Unit, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile)
Marconi, Marcelo (Human Reproduction Unit, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile)
Publication Information
Clinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicine / v.43, no.2, 2016 , pp. 102-105 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objective: The goal of this study was to compare the semen parameters of two successive samples obtained within an interval of less than 60 minutes from patients planning to undergo intrauterine insemination (IUI) whose first samples exhibited low semen quality. Methods: Thirty-two consecutive patients were enrolled in the study. On the day of IUI, the semen analysis of the samples initially presented by all patients met at least two of the following criteria: sperm concentration $<5{\times}10^6/mL$, total sperm count $<10{\times}10^6$, progressive sperm motility (a+b) in the native sample <30%, and total motile sperm count (TMSC) $<4{\times}10^6$. A successive semen sample was obtained no more than 60 minutes after the first sample. Results: Compared to the first sample, the second exhibited significantly (p<0.05) improved sperm concentration, TMSC, progressive motility, and vitality. Regarding TMSC, the most critical parameter on the day of IUI, 23 patients (71.8%) improved it, while nine (28.2%) displayed poorer outcomes. Conclusion: In defined cases, requesting a second successive ejaculate on the day of insemination may result in a high percentage of cases in an improvement of the quality of the sample.
Keywords
Intrauterine insemination; Semen; Sperm count;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Strandell A, Bergh C, Soderlund B, Lundin K, Nilsson L. Fallopian tube sperm perfusion: the impact of sperm count and morphology on pregnancy rates. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2003;82:1023-9.   DOI
2 ESHRE Capri Workshop Group. Intrauterine insemination. Hum Reprod Update 2009;15:265-77.   DOI
3 Vignozzi L, Filippi S, Morelli A, Luconi M, Jannini E, Forti G, et al. Regulation of epididymal contractility during semen emission, the first part of the ejaculatory process: a role for estrogen. J Sex Med 2008;5:2010-6.   DOI
4 Amann RP, Howards SS. Daily spermatozoal production and epididymal spermatozoal reserves of the human male. J Urol 1980;124:211-5.   DOI
5 Prins GS, Zaneveld LJ. Radiographic study of fluid transport in the rabbit vas deferens during sexual rest and after sexual activity. J Reprod Fertil 1980;58:311-9.   DOI
6 Kihara K, Sato K, Ando M, Azuma H, Oshima H. Antegrade and retrograde fluid transport through the vas deferens. Am J Physiol 1995;269:R1197-203.
7 Ambriz D, Rosales AM, Sotelo R, Mora JA, Rosado A, Garcia AR. Changes in the quality of rabbit semen in 14 consecutive ejaculates obtained every 15 minutes. Arch Androl 2002;48:389-95.   DOI
8 Yeung CH, Cooper TG, Oberpenning F, Schulze H, Nieschlag E. Changes in movement characteristics of human spermatozoa along the length of the epididymis. Biol Reprod 1993;49:274-80.   DOI
9 Cooper TG. The epididymis, sperm maturation and fertilisation. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1986.
10 van Duijn C Jr, Freund M. The relationship between some seminal characteristics and ejaculation frequency in the human male. Eur J Obstet Gynecol 1971;1:167-74.   DOI
11 Carlsen E, Petersen JH, Andersson AM, Skakkebaek NE. Effects of ejaculatory frequency and season on variations in semen quality. Fertil Steril 2004;82:358-66.   DOI
12 Hussein TM, Elariny AF, Elabd MM, Elgarem YF, Elsawy MM. Effect of repeated sequential ejaculation on sperm DNA integrity in subfertile males with asthenozoospermia. Andrologia 2008;40:312-7.   DOI
13 World Health Organization. WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.
14 Juarez-Bengoa A, Guadarrama-Garcia LF, Diaz-Perez Mde L. Potential treatment of infertility with second ejaculate. Ginecol Obstet Mex 2010;78:29-36.
15 Bar-Hava I, Perri T, Ashkenazi J, Shelef M, Ben-Rafael Z, Orvieto R. The rationale for requesting a second consecutive sperm ejaculate for assisted reproductive technology. Gynecol Endocrinol 2000;14:433-6.   DOI
16 Zhai DM, Li MJ, Jiang L, Qin AP, Li LM, Hang F. Results of requesting a second consecutive sperm ejaculate on the day of oocyte pick-up in assisted reproductive technology. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue 2011;17:418-21.
17 Tur-Kaspa I, Maor Y, Levran D, Yonish M, Mashiach S, Dor J. How often should infertile men have intercourse to achieve conception? Fertil Steril 1994;62:370-5.   DOI
18 Tur-Kaspa I, Dudkiewicz A, Confino E, Gleicher N. Pooled sequential ejaculates: a way to increase the total number of motile sperm from oligozoospermic men. Fertil Steril 1990;54:906-9.   DOI
19 Dickey RP, Pyrzak R, Lu PY, Taylor SN, Rye PH. Comparison of the sperm quality necessary for successful intrauterine insemination with World Health Organization threshold values for normal sperm. Fertil Steril 1999;71:684-9.   DOI
20 Mayorga-Torres BJ, Camargo M, Agarwal A, du Plessis SS, Cadavid AP, Cardona Maya WD. Influence of ejaculation frequency on seminal parameters. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2015;13:47.   DOI