Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5653/cerm.2013.40.1.23

The utility of sperm DNA damage assay using toluidine blue and aniline blue staining in routine semen analysis  

Kim, Hee-Sun (IVF Laboratory, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Hospital)
Kang, Moon Joo (IVF Laboratory, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Hospital)
Kim, Sung Ah (IVF Laboratory, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Hospital)
Oh, Sun Kyung (IVF Laboratory, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Hospital)
Kim, Hoon (Institute of Reproductive Medicine and Population, Medical Research Center, Seoul National University)
Ku, Seung-Yup (Institute of Reproductive Medicine and Population, Medical Research Center, Seoul National University)
Kim, Seok Hyun (Institute of Reproductive Medicine and Population, Medical Research Center, Seoul National University)
Moon, Shin Yong (Institute of Reproductive Medicine and Population, Medical Research Center, Seoul National University)
Choi, Young Min (Institute of Reproductive Medicine and Population, Medical Research Center, Seoul National University)
Publication Information
Clinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicine / v.40, no.1, 2013 , pp. 23-28 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objective: The aim of the present study was to examine the relationship among male age, strict morphology, and sperm chromatin structure and condensation. Methods: Sperm samples from a total of 100 men underwent semen analysis, and sperm chromatin structure and condensation were assessed with toluidine blue (TB) and aniline blue (AB) tests. Results: Prevalence of strict morphology of less than 4%, and abnormal sperm chromatin structure and condensation did not show any statistically significant differences according to male age (p=0.605, p=0.235, and p=0.080). No significant correlation was demonstrated among age of male partners, strict morphology, and abnormal sperm chromatin structure using TB and AB tests. However, abnormal sperm chromatin condensation was positively associated with sperm chromatin structure (r=0.594, p=0.000) and showed negative correlation with strict morphology (r=-0.219, p=0.029). Conclusion: The tests for sperm chromatin condensation showed a significant association with strict morphology. Further study is needed to elucidate the relationship between clinical outcome and sperm chromatin tests.
Keywords
Toluidine blue; Aniline blue; Semen analysis; DNA damage; Human;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Marcon L, Boissonneault G. Transient DNA strand breaks during mouse and human spermiogenesis new insights in stage specificity and link to chromatin remodeling. Biol Reprod 2004;70: 910-8.   DOI
2 Carrell DT, Liu L, Peterson CM, Jones KP, Hatasaka HH, Erickson L, et al. Sperm DNA fragmentation is increased in couples with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss. Arch Androl 2003;49:49-55.   DOI
3 Virro MR, Larson-Cook KL, Evenson DP. Sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA) parameters are related to fertilization, blastocyst development, and ongoing pregnancy in in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. Fertil Steril 2004; 81:1289-95.   DOI
4 Talebi AR, Vahidi S, Aflatoonian A, Ghasemi N, Ghasemzadeh J, Firoozabadi RD, et al. Cytochemical evaluation of sperm chromatin and DNA integrity in couples with unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortions. Andrologia 2012;44 Suppl 1:462-70.   DOI
5 Collins JA, Barnhart KT, Schlegel PN. Do sperm DNA integrity tests predict pregnancy with in vitro fertilization? Fertil Steril 2008;89:823-31.   DOI
6 Bellver J, Meseguer M, Muriel L, Garcia-Herrero S, Barreto MA, Garda AL, et al. Y chromosome microdeletions, sperm DNA fragmentation and sperm oxidative stress as causes of recurrent spontaneous abortion of unknown etiology. Hum Reprod 2010;25: 1713-21.   DOI
7 Agarwal A, Erenpreiss J, Sharma R. Sperm chromatin assessment. In: Gardner DK, Weissman A, Howles CM, Shoham Z, editors. Textbook of assisted reproductive technologies. 3rd ed. London: Informa Healthcare; 2009. p. 67-84.
8 Dadoune JP, Mayaux MJ, Guihard-Moscato ML. Correlation between defects in chromatin condensation of human spermatozoa stained by aniline blue and semen characteristics. Andrologia 1988;20:211-7.
9 Braun RE. Packaging paternal chromosomes with protamine. Nat Genet 2001;28:10-2.
10 Erenpreiss J, Bars J, Lipatnikova V, Erenpreisa J, Zalkalns J. Comparative study of cytochemical tests for sperm chromatin integrity. J Androl 2001;22:45-53.
11 Erenpreiss J, Jepson K, Giwercman A, Tsarev I, Erenpreisa J, Spano M. Toluidine blue cytometry test for sperm DNA conformation: comparison with the flow cytometric sperm chromatin structure and TUNEL assays. Hum Reprod 2004;19:2277-82.   DOI
12 Wong A, Chuan SS, Patton WC, Jacobson JD, Corselli J, Chan PJ. Addition of eosin to the aniline blue assay to enhance detection of immature sperm histones. Fertil Steril 2008;90:1999-2002.   DOI
13 World Health Organization. WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen [Internet]. 5th ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; c2013 [cited 2013 Mar 4]. Available from: http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/ infertility/9789241547789/en/index.html.
14 Guzick DS, Overstreet JW, Factor-Litvak P, Brazil CK, Nakajima ST, Coutifaris C, et al. Sperm morphology, motility, and concentration in fertile and infertile men. N Engl J Med 2001;345:1388-93.   DOI
15 Evenson DP, Jost LK, Marshall D, Zinaman MJ, Clegg E, Purvis K, et al. Utility of the sperm chromatin structure assay as a diagnostic and prognostic tool in the human fertility clinic. Hum Reprod 1999;14:1039-49.   DOI
16 Park YS, Kim MK, Lee SH, Cho JW, Song IO, Seo JT. Efficacy of testicular sperm chromatin condensation assay using aniline blueeosin staining in the IVF-ET cycle. Clin Exp Reprod Med 2011;38: 142-7.   DOI
17 de la Rochebrochard E, Thonneau P. Paternal age and maternal age are risk factors for miscarriage; results of a multicentre European study. Hum Reprod 2002;17:1649-56.   DOI
18 Barratt CL, Aitken RJ, Bjorndahl L, Carrell DT, de Boer P, Kvist U, et al. Sperm DNA: organization, protection and vulnerability: from basic science to clinical applications--a position report. Hum Reprod 2010;25:824-38.   DOI
19 Beshay VE, Bukulmez O. Sperm DNA damage: how relevant is it clinically? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2012;24:172-9.   DOI
20 The Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. The clinical utility of sperm DNA integrity testing. Fertil Steril 2008; 90:S178-80.
21 The Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Diagnostic evaluation of the infertile male: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2012;98:294-301.   DOI
22 Hammadeh ME, Zeginiadov T, Rosenbaum P, Georg T, Schmidt W, Strehler E. Predictive value of sperm chromatin condensation (aniline blue staining) in the assessment of male fertility. Arch Androl 2001;46:99-104.
23 Nijs M, De Jonge C, Cox A, Janssen M, Bosmans E, Ombelet W. Correlation between male age, WHO sperm parameters, DNA fragmentation, chromatin packaging and outcome in assisted reproduction technology. Andrologia 2011;43:174-9.   DOI