Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5653/cerm.2011.38.4.234

Oocyte maturity in repeated ovarian stimulation  

Lee, Jae-Eun (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Hospital)
Kim, Sang-Don (Songpa Maria Fertility Hospital)
Jee, Byung-Chul (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital)
Suh, Chang-Suk (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital)
Kim, Seok-Hyun (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Hospital)
Publication Information
Clinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicine / v.38, no.4, 2011 , pp. 234-237 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objective: During stimulated IVF cycles, up to 15% of oocytes are recovered as immature. The purpose of this study was to investigate the trend of oocyte maturity in repeated ovarian stimulation for IVF. Methods: One hundred forty-eight patients were selected who underwent two consecutive IVF cycles using same stimulation protocol during 2008 to 2010. Ovarian stimulation was performed with FSH and human menopausal gonadotropin and flexible GnRH antagonist protocol in both cycles. Oocyte maturity was assessed according to presence of germinal vesicle (GV) and the first polar body. Immature oocyte was defined as GV stage or metaphase I oocyte (GV breakdown with no visible polar body) and cultured up to 48 hours. If matured, they were fertilized with ICSI. Results: Percentages of immature oocytes were 30.8% and 32.9% ($p$=0.466) and IVM rates of immature oocytes were 36.2% and 25.7% ($p$=0.077), respectively. A significant correlation was noted between percentage of immature oocytes in the two cycles (R=0.178, $p$=0.03). Women with >40% immaturity in both cycles (n=21) showed lower fertilization rate of $in$ $vivo$ matured oocytes (56.4% vs. 72.0%, $p$=0.005) and lower pregnancy rate (19.0% vs. 27.1%, $p$=0.454) after the second cycle when compared with women with <40% immaturity (n=70). In both groups, female age, number of total retrieved oocyte and embryos transferred were similar. Conclusion: In repeated ovarian stimulation cycles for IVF, the immature oocyte tended to be retrieved repetitively in consecutive IVF cycles.
Keywords
Oocyte maturity; Repeated ovarian stimulation; In vitro maturation; Human;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Hourvitz A, Maman E, Brengauz M, Machtinger R, Dor J. In vitro maturation for patients with repeated in vitro fertilization failure due to "oocyte maturation abnormalities." Fertil Steril 2010;94:496-501.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Veeck LL. Extracorporeal maturation: Norfolk, 1984. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1985;442:357-67.   DOI
3 Levran D, Farhi J, Nahum H, Glezerman M, Weissman A. Maturation arrest of human oocytes as a cause of infertility: case report. Hum Reprod 2002;17:1604-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Salha O, Abusheikha N, Sharma V. Dynamics of human follicular growth and in-vitro oocyte maturation. Hum Reprod Update 1998;4:816-32.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Greenblatt EM, Meriano JS, Casper RF. Type of stimulation protocol affects oocyte maturity, fertilization rate, and cleavage rate after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril 1995;64:557-63.   DOI
6 Gwatkin RB, Conover JC, Collins RL, Quigley MM. Failed fertilization in human in vitro fertilization analyzed with the deoxyribonucleic acid-specific fluorochrome Hoechst 33342. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989;160:31-5.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Laufer N, Tarlatzis BC, DeCherney AH, Masters JT, Haseltine FP, MacLusky N, et al. Asynchrony between human cumulus-corona cell complex and oocyte maturation after human menopausal gonadotropin treatment for in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1984;42:366-72.   DOI
8 Eichenlaub-Ritter U, Peschke M. Expression in in-vivo and in-vitro growing and maturing oocytes: focus on regulation of expression at the translational level. Hum Reprod Update 2002;8:21-41.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Bar-Ami S, Zlotkin E, Brandes JM, Itskovitz-Eldor J. Failure of meiotic competence in human oocytes. Biol Reprod 1994;50:1100-7.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Lanzendorf SE, Zelinski-Wooten MB, Stouffer RL, Wolf DP. Maturity at collection and the developmental potential of rhesus monkey oocytes. Biol Reprod 1990;42:703-11.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 De Vos A, Van de Velde H, Joris H, Van Steirteghem A. In-vitro matured metaphase-I oocytes have a lower fertilization rate but similar embryo quality as mature metaphase-II oocytes after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 1999;14:1859-63.   DOI
12 Jamnongjit M, Hammes SR. Oocyte maturation: the coming of age of a germ cell. Semin Reprod Med 2005;23:234-41.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Jee BC, Han SH, Moon JH, Suh CS, Kim SH; Seoul National University College of Medicine Assisted Reproductive Technology (SMART) Study Group. Influence of well defined protein source on in vitro maturation of human oocyte: human follicular fluid versus human serum albumin. Fertil Steril 2008;89:348-52.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Huddleston HG, Jackson KV, Doyle JO, Racowsky C. hMG increases the yield of mature oocytes and excellent-quality embryos in patients with a previous cycle having a high incidence of oocyte immaturity. Fertil Steril 2009;92:946-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Nogueira D, Friedler S, Schachter M, Raziel A, Ron-El R, Smitz J. Oocyte maturity and preimplantation development in relation to follicle diameter in gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist or antagonist treatments. Fertil Steril 2006;85:578-83.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Dekel N, Sherizly I, Phillips DM, Nimrod A, Zilberstein M, Naor Z. Characterization of the maturational changes induced by a GnRH analogue in the rat ovarian follicle. J Reprod Fertil 1985;75:461-6.   DOI
17 Seibel MM, Smith DM, Levesque L, Borten M, Taymor ML. The temporal relationship between the luteinizing hormone surge and human oocyte maturation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982;142:568-72.   DOI
18 Testart J, Frydman R, Feinstein MC, Thebault A, Roger M, Scholler R. Interpretation of plasma luteinizing hormone assay for the collection of mature oocytes from women: definition of a luteinizing hormone surge-initiating rise. Fertil Steril 1981;36:50-4.   DOI