Browse > Article

Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis for Aneuploidy Screening in Patients with Poor Reproductive Outcome  

Kim, Jin Yeong (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cheil General Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
Lim, Chun Kyu (Laboratory of Reproductive Biology and Infertility, Cheil General Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
Cha, Sun Hwa (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cheil General Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
Park, Soo Hyun (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cheil General Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
Yang, Kwang Moon (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cheil General Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
Song, In Ok (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cheil General Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
Jun, Jin Hyun (Laboratory of Reproductive Biology and Infertility, Cheil General Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
Park, So Yeon (Laboratory of Genetics, Cheil General Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
Koong, Mi Kyoung (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cheil General Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
Kang, Inn Soo (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cheil General Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
Publication Information
Clinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicine / v.33, no.3, 2006 , pp. 179-187 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objectives: The risk of aneuploidies of embryos increases in advanced maternal age or parental karyotype abnormality and it results in poor reproductive outcomes such as recurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA) or repeated implantation failure (RIF). Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening (PGD-AS) can be applied for better ART outcome by selecting chromosomally normal embryos. The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical outcome of PGD-AS and which group can get much benefit from PGD-AS among the patients expected to have poor reproductive outcome. Methods: In 42 patients, 77 PGD cycles were performed for aneuploidy screening. Patients were allocated to 3 groups according to the indication of PGD-AS: group I-patients with old age (${\geq}37$) and RIF more than 3 times (n=11, mean age=42.2 yrs.), group II-patients with RSA (${\geq}3$ times) associated with aneuploid pregnancy (n=19, mean age=38.9 yrs.), group III-parental sex chromosome abnormality or mosaicism (n=18, mean age=29.6 yrs.) including Turner syndrome, Klinefelter syndrome and 47, XYY. PGD was performed by using FISH for chromosome 13, 16, 18, 21, X and Y in group I and II, and chromosome X, Y and 18 (or 17) in group III. Results: Blastomere biopsy was successful in 530 embryos and FISH efficiency was 92.3%. The proportions of transferable embryos in each group were $32.5{\pm}17.5%$, $23.0{\pm}21.7%$ and $52.6{\pm}29.2%$ (mean ${\pm}$ SD), respectively, showing higher normal rate in group III (group II vs. III, p<0.05). The numbers of transferred embryos in each group were $3.9{\pm}1.5$, $1.9{\pm}1.1$ and $3.1{\pm}1.4$ (mean ${\pm}$ SD), respectively. The clinical pregnancy rates per transfer was 0%, 30.0% and 20.0%, and it was significantly higher in group II (group I vs. group II, p<0.05). The overall pregnancy rate per transfer was 19.6% (10/51) and the spontaneous abortion rate was 20% (2/10) of which karyotypes were euploid. Nine healthy babies (one twin pregnancy) were born with normal karyotype confirmed on amniocentesis. Conclusion: Our data suggests that PGD-AS provides advantages in patients with RSA associated with aneuploidy or sex chromosome abnormality, decreasing abortion rate and increasing ongoing pregnancy rate. It is not likely to be beneficial in RIF group due to other detrimental factors involved in implantation.
Keywords
PGD; Aneuploidy; FISH; RIF; RSA;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Simpson JL. Genes, chromosomes and reproductive failure. Fertil Steril 1980; 33(2): 107-16   DOI
2 Carp H, Toder V, Aviram A, Daneily M, Mashiach S, Barkai G. Karyotype of the abortus in recurrent miscarriage. Fertil Steril 2001; 75: 678-82   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Tarani L, Lampariello G, Raguso F, Colloridi F, Pucarrelli I, Pasquino AM, et al. Pregnancy in patients with Turner's syndrome: six new cases with review of literature. Gynecol Endocrinol 1998; 12: 83-7   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Friedler S, Raziel A, Strassburger D, Schachter M, Bern 0, Ron-El R. Outcome of ICSI using fresh and cryopreserved-thawed testicular spermatozoa in patients with non-mosaic Klinefelter's syndrome. Hum Reprod 2001; 16(12): 2616-20   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Denschlag D, Tempfer C, Kunze M, Wolff G, Keck C. Assisted reproductive techniques in patients with Klinefelter syndrome: a critical review. Fertil Steril 2004; 82(4): 775-9   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Silber S, Escudero T, Lenahan K, Abdelhadi I, Kilani Z, Munne S. Chromosomal abnormalities in embryos derived from testicular sperm extraction. Fertil Steril 2003; 79(1): 30-8   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Munne S, Magli C, Cohen J, Morton P, Sadowy S, Gianaroli L, et al. Positive outcome after preimplantation diagnosis of aneuploidy in human embryos. Hum Reprod 1999; 14(9): 2191-9   DOI
8 Magli M, Gianaroli L, Munne S, Ferraretti AP. Incidence of chromosomal abnormalities from a morphologically normal cohort of embryos in poor prognostic patients. J Assist Reprod Genet 1998; 15(5): 297-301   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Kuliev A, Verlinsky. Thirteen years' experience of preimplantation diagnosis: report of the Fifth international symposium on preimplantation genetics. Reprod Biomed Online 2003; 8(2): 229-35   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Munne S, Sandalina M, Escudero T, Velilla E, Walmsley R, Sadowy S. Improved implantation after preimplantation genetic diagnosis of aneuploidy. RBM-online 2003; 7: 91-7
11 Gianaroli L, Magli MC, Ferraretti AP, Munne S. Preimplantation diagnosis for aneuploidies in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization with a poor prognosis: identification of the categories for which it should be proposed. Fertil Steril 1999; 72(5): 837-44   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Harper JC, Boelaert K, Geraedts J, Harton G, Keams WG, Moutou C, et al. ESHRE PGD consortium data collection V: Cycles from January to December 2002 with pregnancy follow-up to October 2003. Hum Reprod 2006; 21(1): 3-21   과학기술학회마을
13 Munne S, Marquez C, Magli C, Morton P, Morrison L. Scoring criteria for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of numerical abnormalities for chromosomes X, Y, 13, 16, 18 and 21. Mol Hum Reprod 1998; 4: 863-70   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Obasaju M, Kadam A, Biancardi T, Sultan K, Fateh M, Munne S. Pregnancies from single normal embryo transfer in women older than 40 years. RBMonline 2001; 2: 98-101
15 Munne S, Magli C, Bahce M, Fung J, Iegator M, Morrison L. Preimplantation diagnosis of the aneuploies most commonly found in spontaneous abortions and live births: XY, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 21, 22. Prenat Diangn 1998; 18: 1459-66   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Hill David H. Ten years of preimplantation genetic diagnosis-aneuploidy screening: review of a multicenter report. Fertil Steril 2004; 82(2): 300-1   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Stephenson MD, Awartani KA, Robinson WP. Cytogenetic analysis of miscarriages from couples with recurrent miscarriage: a case-control study. Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 446-51   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Munne S, Alikani M, Tomkin G, Grifo J, Cohen J. Embryo morphology, developmental rates and maternal age are correlated with chromosome abnormalities. Fertil Steril 1995; 64: 382-91   DOI
19 김진영, 임천규, 전진현, 박소연, 서주태, 차선화, 등. 클라인펠터 증후군 환자에서 착상전 유전진단의 결과. 대한불임학회지 2004; 31(4): 253-60
20 김진영, 임천규, 송인옥, 유근재, 양광문, 한국선, 등. 유전질환 및 염색체 이상의 예방을 위한 착상전 유전진단의 결과. 대한불임학회지 2002; 29(4): 269-78
21 Ferraretti AP, Magli Me, Kopcow L, Gianaroli L. Prognostic role of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy in assisted reproductive technology outcome. Hum Reprod 2004; 19(3): 694-9   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Munne S, Sandalinas M, Magli C, Gianaroli L, Cohen Jwarburton D. Increased rate of aneuploid embryos in young women with previous aneuploid conceptions. Prenat Diagn 2004; 24: 638-43   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Swapp GH, Johnston AW, Watt JL, Couzin DA, Stephen GS, et al. A fertile woman with non-mosaic Turner's syndrome. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 96: 876-80   DOI
24 Staessen C, Platteau P, Assche EV, Michiels A, Tournaye H, Camus M, et al. Comparison of blastocyst transfer with or without preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in couples with advanced maternal age: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod 2004; 19(12): 2849-58   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Gianaroli L, Magli MC, Ferraretti AP, Tabanelli C, Trombeta C, Boudjema E. The role of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidies. RBM-online 2001; 4. suppl.3: 31-6
26 Handyside AH, Pattinson JK, Penketh RJ, Edlhanty JD, Winston RM, Tuddenham EG. Biopsy of human preimplantation embryos and sexing by DNA amplification. Lancet 1989; 18: 347-9
27 Munne S, Lee A, Rosenwaks Z, Grifo J, Cohen J. Diagnosis of major chromosome aneuploidies in human preimiplantation embryos. Hum Reprod 1993; 8: 2185   DOI
28 Munne S, Lee A, Rosenwaks Z, Grifo J, Cohen J. Diagnosis of major chromosome aneuploidies in human preimplantation embryos. Hum Reprod 1993; 8(12): 2185-91   DOI
29 Munne S, Lee A, Rosenwaks Z, Grifo J, Cohen J. Diagnosis of major chromosome aneuploidies in human preimplantation embryos. Hum Reprod 1993; 8: 2185-91   DOI
30 Sullivan AE, Silver RM, LaCoursiere DY, Proter TF, Branch DW. Recurrent fetal aneuploidy and recurrent miscarriage. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 104: 784-8   DOI   ScienceOn
31 Magli MC, Gianaroli L, Ferraretti AP, Gordts S, Feliciani E. Impact of parental gonosomal mosaicism detected in peripheral blood on preimplantation embryos. RBMonline 2002; 5(3): 306-12
32 Ron-El R, Friedler S, Strassburger D, et al. Birth of a healthy neonate following the intracytoplasmic injection of testicular spermatozoa from a patient with Klinefelter's syndrome. Hum Reprod 1999; 14: 368-70   DOI   ScienceOn
33 Munne S, Fischer J, Warner A, Chen S, Zouves C, Cohen J, et al. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis significantly reduces pregnancy loss in infertile couples: a multicenter study. Fertil Steril 2006; 85: 326-32   DOI   ScienceOn
34 Sanchez JM, Franzi L, Collia F, De Diaz SL, Panal M, Cubner M. Cytogenetic study of spontaneous abortions by transabdominal villus sampling and direct analysis of villi. Prenat Diag 1999; 19: 601-3   DOI   ScienceOn
35 Kuliev A, Cieslak J, Ikewitch Y, Verlinsky Y. Chromosomal abnormalities in a series of 6733 oocytes in preimplantation diagnosis of age-related aneuploidies. Reprod Biomed Online 2003; 6: 54-9   DOI   ScienceOn
36 Stern JJ, Dofrman AD, Gutierez-Najar MD. Frequency of abnormal karyotype among abortuses from women with and without a history of recurrent spontaneous abortion. Fertil Steril 1996; 65: 250-3   DOI
37 Kahraman S, Bahce M, Samli H, Imirzalioglu N, Yakism K, Cengiz G, et al. Healthy births and ongoing pregnancies obtained by preimplantation genetic diagnosis in patients with advanced maternal age and recurrent implantation failure. Hum Reprod 2000; 15(9): 2003-7   DOI   ScienceOn
38 Munne S, Magli C, Cohen J, Morton P, Sadowy S, Gianaroli L. Positive outcome after preimplantation genetic diagnosis of aneuploidy in human embryos. Hum Reprod 1999; 14(9): 2191-9   DOI
39 Plateau P, Staessen C, Michiels A, Steirteghem AV, Liebaers I, Devroey P. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in patients with unexplained recurrent miscarriages. Fertil Steril 2005; 83(2): 393-7   DOI   ScienceOn
40 Munne S, Sepulveda S, Balmaceda J, Fernandez E, Fabres C, Mackenna A, et al. Selection of the most common chromosome abnormalities in oocytes prior to ICSI. Prenat Diagn 2000; 20: 582-6   DOI   ScienceOn