Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.9728/dcs.2018.19.3.595

A study on factors Affecting Performance Assessment of Small and Medium Business R&D Project  

Kim, Yong-Sung (School of Business Administration, Soongsil University)
Han, Kyeong-Seok (School of Business Administration, Soongsil University)
Publication Information
Journal of Digital Contents Society / v.19, no.3, 2018 , pp. 595-603 More about this Journal
Abstract
Recently, the government has been interested in the creative economy in order to create new added value through industries and cultures, jobs, and growth engines for talented people who have creative ideas. The government emphasized technology commercialization as a core task for the realization of the creative economy in the '5th Technology Transfer and Commercialization Promotion Plan' based on the 'Technology Transfer and Commercialization Promotion Act' in order to ensure that the technologies developed through R&D projects lead to new industries and job creation. It is necessary to study what kind of variables are influenced by specific variables in the utilization and process of the developed technology to lead the results as the proportion of national R&D budget is increasing and it is linked to the achievement of R&D purpose. Therefore, an empirical study was conducted to measure factors affecting performance for practitioners who evaluate the performance of SME technology development projects. As a result, Readiness, Technological Performance and Competency Assessment effect Performance Assessment positively.
Keywords
Small and Medium Business; Performance Assessment; Competency Assessment; Readiness; Technological Performance;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Korea Institute of Science Technology Evaluation and Planning, "Comparison of R&D Investment between Korea and Major Countries," Statistics Briefing, Vol.16, 2015.
2 K. W. Kim, "A Study on the Efficiency Analysis and Improvement of Government-Sponsored Industrial R&D Program Using Value Chain DEA Model," 2016.
3 E. T. Park, "Economics Dictionary," Genyunsa, 2014.
4 Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning, "R&D Helper Center,".
5 S. M. Kim, "Evaluating the Efficiency of Government Sponsored R&D Projects," 2010.
6 H. D. Cho, "Analysis of System and Structure of Government R&D Project and Proposal of Policy," Science and Technology Policy Institute, 2003.
7 Korea Testing Laboratory, "Study of Improvement Plan for the Licensing policy," 2002.
8 X. S. Michael, and M. E. Parry, "The Determinants of the Japanese New Productsuccess," Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.34, No.1, pp.64-76, 1997.   DOI
9 J. H. Lee, "An International Comparative Study on the Factors of Successful New Product Development in Korea and the United States," 2000.
10 D. K. Ko, "A Study on the Performance Improvement of New Product Development by Implementing R&D Six Sigma," 2003.
11 R. C. M. Yam, J. C. Guan, K. F. Pun, and E. P. Y. Tang, "An Audit of Technological Innovation Capabilities in Chinese Firma; Some Empiricalfindings in Beijing, China," Research Policy, Vol.33, pp.1123-1140, 2004.   DOI
12 X. Huang, G. N. Soutar and A. Brown, "Resourceadequacy Innew Productdevelopment: A Discriminantanalysis," European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol.4, No.1, pp.53-59, 2001.   DOI
13 S. Valle, and L. Avella, "Cross-Functionality and Leadership of the New Product Development Teams," European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol.6, No.1, pp.32-47, 2003.   DOI
14 S. H. Shin, "Development of Analytical Models for the Feasibility of Buildings ," 2009.
15 S. J. Kim, J. J. Kim, and S. K. Kim, "A Verification of a Feasibility Study Methodology Reflecting the Risk for Expected Return at Privately Financed Construction Projects," Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Structure & Construction, Vol.18, No.10, pp.109-116, 2002.
16 S. M. Koo, and M. W. Jung "A Basic Study on the Current State and Problems of Feasibility Study-Focused on the Evaluation Criteria of the Existing Relative Researches," The Architectural Institute of Korea, Vol.23, No.9, pp.79-88, 2007.
17 K. H. So, "Competency in the Context of Schooling: It's Meaning and Curricular Implications," The Korean Society for Curriculum Studies. Vol.25, No.3, pp.1-21, 2007.
18 M. C. Kieke, K. Moroz, and A. S. Gort, "The Transformation to a Learner-Centered Community as a Result of Universitywide Assessment," On the Horizon, Vol.15, No.2, pp.107-117, 2007.   DOI
19 J. Allen, "A Multicultural Assessment Supervision Model to Guide Research and Practice," Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, Vol.38, No.3, pp.248-258, 2007.   DOI
20 H. M. Anderson, D. L. Moore, G. Anaya, and E. Bird, "Student Learning Outcomes Assessment: A Component of Program Assessment," American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, Vol.69, No.2, pp.256-268, 2005.
21 J. Brown, and B. Susan, "Skillful Inventory," Bank Marketing, Vol.31, No.8, pp.16-24, 1999.
22 Y. H. Choi, J. K. Shin, and S. H. Kim, "The Impact of Top Management, Strategy, and Structure on Performance of Small and Medium Sized Firm," Research of Small and Medium Enterprise, Vol.25, No.2, pp.103-125, 2003.
23 G. N. Chandler, and S. H. Hanks, "Market Attractiveness Resource-Based Capabilities, Venture Strategies, and Venture Performance," Journal of Business Venturing, Vol.9, pp. 331-349, 1994.   DOI
24 D. W. Beard, and G. G. Dess, "Corporate-Level Strategy, Business-Level Strategy and Firm Performance," Academy of Management Journal, Vol.20, No.4, pp.836-866, 1981.
25 M. Sashkin, "A Guide to Participative Management," In J. W. Pfeiffer and L. D. Goodstein (Eds.) The 1984 Annual, Developing Human Resources (pp.227-241). San Diego, CA: Unversity Associates, 1984.
26 G. Devos, M. Buelens, and D. Bouckenooghe, "Contribution of Content, Context, and Process to Understanding Openness to Organizational Change: Two Experimental Simulation Studies." The Journal of Social Psychology, Vol.147, No.6, pp.607-629, 2007.   DOI
27 D. S. Lee, "A Study on the Effect of Technological Innovation Capability and Technology Commercialization Capability on Business Performance in SMEs of Korea," 2009.
28 A. E. Rafferty, and R. H. Simons, "An Examination of the Antecedents of Readiness for Fine-Tuning and Corporate Transformation Changes," Journal of Business and Psychology, Vol.20, No.3, pp. 325-350, 2006.   DOI
29 S. Lach, "Do R&D Subsidies Stimulate or Displace Private R&D? Evidence From Israel," The Journal of Nidustrial Economics, Vol,50, No.4, pp.369-390, 2002.   DOI
30 R. C. M. Yam, J. C. Guan, K. F. Pun, and E. P. Y. Tang, "An Audit of Technological Innovation Capabilities in Chinese Firms: Some Empirical Findings in Beijing, China," Research Policy, Vol.33, pp.1123-1140, 2004.   DOI
31 S. K. Kim, "A Study on Technology Innovation Performance through R&D Capability and Technology Commercialization Capability of IT SMEs," 2008.
32 P. Park, and D. K. Ko, "An Analysis of the Influence of Liquidation Price on the Resettlement of Housing Redevelopment," Korea Real Estate Academy, Vol.24, pp.180-192, 2005.
33 H. K. Lim,"Analysis of Evaluations and Determinants on Residential Resettlement in Accordance with Urban Regeneration," 2009.
34 Parry, S. R. "The Quest for Competencies," Training, pp.48-56, 1996.
35 S. K. Lee, and Y. J. Park, "Distance E-learners' Motivation, Perception, and Learning Behaviour in Vocational Training Environment," Journal of DCS, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp.499-508, 2017.