Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2019.00388

The clinical usefulness of closed reduction of nasal bone using only a periosteal elevator with a rubber band  

Park, Young Ji (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Gyeongsang National University Hospital)
Ryu, Woo Sang (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Gyeongsang National University Hospital)
Kwon, Gyu Hyeon (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Gyeongsang National University Hospital)
Lee, Kyung Suk (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Gyeongsang National University Hospital)
Publication Information
Archives of Craniofacial Surgery / v.20, no.5, 2019 , pp. 284-288 More about this Journal
Abstract
Background: Closed reduction of nasal fracture with various instrument is performed to treat nasal fracture. Depending on the type of nasal fracture and the situation in which it is being operated, the surgeon will determine the surgical tool. The objective of this study was to investigate whether a periosteal elevator (PE) was a proper device to perform closed reduction for patients with simple nasal fractures. Methods: From March 2018 to December 2018, 50 cases of simple nasal bone fracture underwent closed reduction performed by a single surgeon. These patients were divided into two groups randomly: nasal bone reduction was performed using only PE (freer) and nasal bone reduction was performed using Walsham, Asch forcep, and Boies elevator (non-freer, non-PE). Results: The paranasal sinus computed tomography was performed on patients before and after operation to carry out an accurate measurement of reduction distance at the same level. According to the results, the interaction between instruments and fracture types had a significant influence on reduction distance (p = 0.021). To be specific, reduction distance was significantly (p= 0.004) increased by 2.157 mm when PE was used to treat patients with partial displacement compared to that when non-PEs were used. Conclusion: Closed reduction using PE and other elevator is generally an effective treatment for nasal fracture. In partial-displacement type of simple nasal fracture, closed reduction using PE can have considerable success in comparison with using classic instruments.
Keywords
Facial bone; Fracture; Nasal bone; Reduction; Treatment outcome;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Chung SH, Park J, Choe J, Baek SM. Clinical analysis of satisfaction of nasal bone reduction. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 1994;21:984-90.
2 Hong SB, Choi BW, Suh IS, Ha JH. Clinical & radiological evaluation of the nasal bone fractures. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 1996;23:1572-82.
3 Rohrich RJ, Adams WP Jr. Nasal fracture management: minimizing secondary nasal deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000;106:266-73.   DOI
4 Lee YJ, Lee KT, Pyon JK. Finger reduction of nasal bone fracture under local anesthesia: outcomes and patient reported satisfaction. Arch Craniofac Surg 2019;20:24-30.   DOI
5 Kang CM, Han DG. Objective outcomes of closed reduction according to the type of nasal bone fracture. Arch Craniofac Surg 2017;18:30-6.   DOI
6 Stranc MF, Robertson GA. A classification of injuries of the nasal skeleton. Ann Plast Surg 1979;2:468-74.   DOI
7 Pollock RA. Nasal trauma: pathomechanics and surgical management of acute injuries. Clin Plast Surg 1992;19:133-47.   DOI
8 Ridder GJ, Boedeker CC, Fradis M, Schipper J. Technique and timing for closed reduction of isolated nasal fractures: a retrospective study. Ear Nose Throat J 2002;81:49-54.   DOI
9 Mondin V, Rinaldo A, Ferlito A. Management of nasal bone fractures. Am J Otolaryngol 2005;26:181-5.   DOI
10 Hwang K, You SH, Kim SG, Lee SI. Analysis of nasal bone fractures; a six-year study of 503 patients. J Craniofac Surg 2006;17:261-4.   DOI
11 Rhee SC, Kim YK, Cha JH, Kang SR, Park HS. Septal fracture in simple nasal bone fracture. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;113:45-52.   DOI