Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2019.00304

Reconstruction of extended orbital floor fracture using an implantation method of gamma-shaped porous polyethylene  

Hwang, Woosuk (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Inje University School of Medicine)
Kim, Jin Woo (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Inje University School of Medicine)
Publication Information
Archives of Craniofacial Surgery / v.20, no.3, 2019 , pp. 164-169 More about this Journal
Abstract
Background: The conventional surgical method for reconstructing orbital floor fractures involves restoration of orbital continuity by covering an onlay with a thin material under the periorbital region. However, in large orbital floor fractures, the implant after inserting is often dislocated, leading to malposition. This study aimed to propose a novel implanting method and compare it with existing methods. Methods: Among patients who underwent surgery for large orbital floor fractures, 24 who underwent the conventional onlay implanting method were compared with 21 who underwent the novel ${\gamma}$ implanting method that two implant sheets were stacked and bent to resemble the shape of the Greek alphabet ${\gamma}$. When inserting a ${\gamma}$-shaped implant, the posterior ledge of the orbital floor was placed between the two sheets and the bottom sheet was impacted onto the posterior wall of the maxilla to play a fixative role while the top sheet was placed above the residual orbital floor to support orbital contents. Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Mann-Whitney U test were used for data analyses. Results: Compared to the conventional onlay method, the gamma method resulted in better restoration of orbital contents, better improvement of enophthalmos, and fewer revision surgeries. Conclusion: Achieving good surgical outcomes for extended orbital floor fractures is known to be difficult. However, better surgical outcomes could be obtained by using the novel implantation method of impacting a ${\gamma}$-shaped porous polyethylene posteriorly.
Keywords
Operative; Orbital fractures; Orbital implant; Surgical procedure;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Jo EJ, Yang HJ, Kim JH. Fixation of fractured inferior orbital wall using fibrin glue in inferior blowout fracture surgery. J Craniofac Surg 2015;26:e33-6.   DOI
2 Jones DE, Evans JN. "Blow-out" fractures of the orbit: an investigation into their anatomical basis. J Laryngol Otol 1967;81:1109-20.   DOI
3 Hwang WJ, Lee DH, Choi W, Hwang JH, Kim KS, Lee SY. Analysis of orbital volume measurements following reduction and internal fixation using absorbable mesh plates and screws for patients with orbital floor blowout fractures. J Craniofac Surg 2017;28:1664-9.   DOI
4 Kim YH, Kim TG, Lee JH, Nam HJ, Lim JH. Inlay implanting technique for the correction of medial orbital wall fracture. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011;127:321-6.   DOI
5 Schlittler F, Schmidli A, Wagner F, Michel C, Mottini M, Lieger O. What is the incidence of implant malpositioning and revision surgery after orbital repair? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018;76:146-53.   DOI
6 Ellis E 3rd, Tan Y. Assessment of internal orbital reconstructions for pure blowout fractures: cranial bone grafts versus titanium mesh. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003;61:442-53.   DOI
7 Choi JC, Fleming JC, Aitken PA, Shore JW. Porous polyethylene channel implants: a modified porous polyethylene sheet implant designed for repairs of large and complex orbital wall fractures. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 1999;15:56-66.   DOI
8 Park J, Huh J, Lee J, Chang M, Lee H, Park M, et al. Reconstruction of large orbital posterior floor wall fracture considering orbital floor slope using endoscope. J Craniofac Surg 2017;28:947-50.   DOI
9 Gosau M, Schoneich M, Draenert FG, Ettl T, Driemel O, Reichert TE. Retrospective analysis of orbital floor fractures: complications, outcome, and review of literature. Clin Oral Investig 2011;15:305-13.   DOI
10 Gosse EM, Ferguson AW, Lymburn EG, Gilmour C, MacEwen CJ. Blow-out fractures: patterns of ocular motility and effect of surgical repair. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010;48:40-3.   DOI