Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2018.02271

Reconstruction of cutaneous defects of the nasal tip and alar by two different methods  

Kim, Yong Hun (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine)
Yoon, Hyung Woo (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine)
Chung, Seum (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, National Health Insurance Corporation Ilsan Hospital)
Chung, Yoon Kyu (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine)
Publication Information
Archives of Craniofacial Surgery / v.19, no.4, 2018 , pp. 260-263 More about this Journal
Abstract
Background: The alar and nasal tip are important subunits of the nose. Determining the optimal procedure for reconstructing a cutaneous defect in a nasal subunit depends on several factors including size, location, and involvement of deep underlying structures. We treated cutaneous defects after tumor ablation in the alar and nasal tip with a local flap, using an S-shaped design and a modified V-Y advancement flap with a croissant shape. Methods: We analyzed 36 patients with skin tumors who underwent flap coverage after tumor ablation. Rotation flaps were used in 26 cases and croissant-shaped V-Y advancement flaps were used in 10 cases. The primary cause of the defects was skin cancer, except for one benign tumor. Results: The mean patient age was 71 years. The size of the defects ranged from $0.49cm^2$ to $3.5cm^2$. No recurrence of skin cancer was noted and all flaps lasted until the end of follow-up. Partial desquamation of the epidermis was noted in one case. The postoperative appearance for most patients was excellent, objectively and subjectively. Conclusion: For cutaneous defects of up to about $4.0cm^2$ of the alar and nasal tip, local flaps using our methods offered a good cosmetic and therapeutic result. The main advantage of our flaps is the minimal dissection required compared to bilobed and other local flap methods. We believe our flaps are a suitable option for alar and nasal tip reconstruction.
Keywords
Nose; Surgical flaps; Carcinoma; Basal cell;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Lindsay KJ, Morton JD. Flap or graft: the best of both in nasal ala reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2015;68:1352-7.   DOI
2 Kim JY, Chung S, Chung YK. Croissant-shaped v-y advancement flap with 2 horns for repair of small- and medium-sized facial defects. J Craniofac Surg 2011;22:1781-4.   DOI
3 Burget GC, Menick FJ. The subunit principle in nasal reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1985;76:239-47.   DOI
4 Golcman R, Speranzini MB, Golcman B. The bilobed island flap in nasal ala reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg 1998;51:493-8.   DOI
5 Xue CY, Li L, Guo LL, Li JH, Xing X. The bilobed flap for reconstruction of distal nasal defect in Asians. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2009;33:600-4.   DOI
6 Yellin SA, Nugent A. Melolabial flaps for nasal reconstruction. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2011;19:123-39.   DOI
7 Steiger JD. Bilobed flaps in nasal reconstruction. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2011;19:107-11.   DOI
8 Correa BJ, Weathers WM, Wolfswinkel EM, Thornton JF. The forehead flap: the gold standard of nasal soft tissue reconstruction. Semin Plast Surg 2013;27:96-103.   DOI