Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2017.18.3.172

Cervicofacial Flap: Can We Save Patient's Sideburns?  

Lim, Dong Seob (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chonnam National University Medical School)
Lee, Do Heon (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chonnam National University Medical School)
Kim, Seong Hwan (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chonnam National University Medical School)
Kim, Kyung Pil (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chonnam National University Medical School)
Hwang, Jae Ha (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chonnam National University Medical School)
Kim, Kwang Seog (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chonnam National University Medical School)
Lee, Sam Yong (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chonnam National University Medical School)
Publication Information
Archives of Craniofacial Surgery / v.18, no.3, 2017 , pp. 172-178 More about this Journal
Abstract
Background: The conventional cervicofacial flap may cause the aesthetic problem of sideburns with a mismatched shape and arrangement. We developed a modified method with the goals of minimizing the destruction of the shape and arrangement of the sideburns and minimizing complications in comparison with the conventional method. Methods: The incision line was designed to descend just in front of the sideburns, without passing through them, and then to ascend with the sideburns posteriorly when a cervicofacial flap is performed, unlike the conventional method. Patients in whom this method was applied (group B) and patients who underwent surgery using the conventional method (group A) were investigated in a retrospective study. The method was evaluated by assessing changes in the arrangement of the sideburns and patients' satisfaction, and differences in the complication rate. Results: In group A, 23 of the 31 patients experienced changes in the arrangement of their sideburns. Most patients who experienced a change in the arrangement of their sideburns were dissatisfied with the change. The patients in group B did not experience such changes, and the defects were well reconstructed. Most of them were satisfied with the final sideburn arrangement. Conclusion: A novel method was used to preserve the sideburns while performing a cervicofacial flap. As a result, the appearance of the sideburns was well preserved and the satisfaction of patients was also high. Moreover, this technique could also prove useful for reconstruction without any increase in complications compared to the conventional method.
Keywords
Surgical flaps; Cheek; Eyelids;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Mustarde JC. The use of flaps in the orbital region. Plast Reconstr Surg 1970;45:146-50.
2 Stark RB, Kaplan JM. Rotation flaps, neck to cheek. Plast Reconstr Surg 1972;50:230-3.
3 Bokhari WA, Wang SJ. Modified approach to the cervicofacial rotation flap in head and neck reconstruction. Open Otolaryngol J 2011;5:18-24.
4 Yang Z, Fan J, Tian J, Liu L, Gan C, Chen W, et al. Aesthetic sideburn reconstruction with an expanded reversed temporoparieto-occipital scalp flap. J Craniofac Surg 2014;25:1168-70.
5 Cook TA, Israel JM, Wang TD, Murakami CS, Brownrigg PJ. Cervical rotation flaps for midface resurfacing. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1991;117:77-82.
6 Moore BA, Wine T, Netterville JL. Cervicofacial and cervicothoracic rotation flaps in head and neck reconstruction. Head Neck 2005;27:1092-101.
7 Austen WG Jr, Parrett BM, Taghinia A, Wolfort SF, Upton J. The subcutaneous cervicofacial flap revisited. Ann Plast Surg 2009;62:149-53.
8 Liu FY, Xu ZF, Li P, Sun CF, Li RW, Ge SF, et al. The versatile application of cervicofacial and cervicothoracic rotation flaps in head and neck surgery. World J Surg Oncol 2011;9:135.
9 Tan ST, MacKinnon CA. Deep plane cervicofacial flap: a useful and versatile technique in head and neck surgery. Head Neck 2006;28:46-55.
10 Juri J, Juri C. Advancement and rotation of a large cervicofacial flap for cheek repairs. Plast Reconstr Surg 1979;64:692-6.