Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.13066/kspm.2019.14.3.29

The Comparison of the Gluteus Maximus Activity during Various Prone Hip Extension in Subject with Chronic Low Back Pain  

Kwon, Yoo-Hun (Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate School, Yonsei University)
Cynn, Heon-Seock (Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate School, Yonsei University)
Park, Dong-Hwan (Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate School, Yonsei University)
Shin, A-Reum (Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate School, Yonsei University)
Baik, Seung-Min (Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate School, Yonsei University)
Lee, Ji-Hyun (Department of Physical Therapy, Baekseok University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society of Physical Medicine / v.14, no.3, 2019 , pp. 29-37 More about this Journal
Abstract
PURPOSE: Prone hip extension (PHE) has been used for assessment of lumbo-pelvic movement and strengthening exercise for weakness of the hip joint muscles in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). On the other hand, few studies have examined which are the best PHE exercises to activate the gluteus maximus (GM) selectively in physical therapy practice. To aim of this study compared the muscle activity of the GM, rectus femoris (RF), biceps femoris (BF), tibialis anterior (TA) during these four different prone hip extensions, PHE, PHE with quadriceps activation (PHEQA), PHE with ankle dorsiflexion (PHEAD), and PHE with ankle plantarflexion (PHEAP), in subjects with CLBP. METHODS: Nineteen subjects with low back pain participated in this study. Subject performed four PHE exercises and surface electromyography (EMG) was used to evaluate the muscle activity. Data were analyzed by one-way repeated-measures analysis of variance (${\alpha}=.05/3=.017$) and a Bonferroni adjustment was performed if a significant difference was found. RESULTS: The muscle activities recorded by EMG showed significant among the four exercises. The muscle activity of the GM increased significantly during PHEQA than during PHEAP (P=.012). CONCLUSION: PHEQA is the most effective exercise for eliciting greater GM muscle activation among the four PHE exercises in subjects with CLBP.
Keywords
Prone hip extension; Low back pain; Gluteus maximus;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Edgar E, Ohnhaus, Adler R, et al. Methodological problems in the measurement of pain: A comparison between the verbal rating scale and the visual analogue scale. 1975;1(4):379-84.   DOI
2 Criswell E. Cram jr. Cram's introduction to surface electromyography. 2010.
3 Kendall FP, McCreary EK, Provance PG, et al. Muscles: Testing and function, with posture and pain. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 2005.
4 Emami M, Arab AM, Ghamkhar L, et al. The activity pattern of the lumbo-pelvic muscles during prone hip extension in athletes with and without hamstring strain injury. International journal of sports physical therapy. 2014;9(3):312.
5 Arab AM, Ghamkhar L, Emami M, et al. Altered muscular activation during prone hip extension in women with and without low back pain. Chiropractic & manual therapies. 2011;19(1):18.   DOI
6 Sakamoto AC, Teixeira-Salmela LF, de Paula-Goulart FR, et al. Muscular activation patterns during active prone hip extension exercises. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2009;19(1):105-12.   DOI
7 Bryanton, Megan. Quadriceps effort during squat exercise depends on hip extensor muscle strategy. Sports biomechanics. 2015;14(1):122-38.   DOI
8 Mokhtarzadeh, Hossein. Contributions of the Soleus and Gastrocnemius muscles to the anterior cruciate ligament loading during single-leg landing. Journal of biomechanics. 2013;46(11):1913-20.   DOI
9 O' Connor, John J, Zavatsky, et al. Anterior cruciate ligament forces in activity. The Anterior Cruciate Ligament: Current and Future Concepts. Raven Press, New York. 1993.
10 Hopf HC, Schlegel HJ, Lowitzsch K, et al. Irradiation of voluntary activity to the contralateral side in movements of normal subjects and patients with central motor disturbances. European neurology. 1974;12(3):142-7.   DOI
11 Benz RJ, Friden J, Lieber RL, et al. Simultaneous stiffness and force measurements reveal subtle injury to rabbit soleus muscles. Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry. 1998;179(1-2):147-58.   DOI
12 Shimura K, Kasai T. Effects of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation on the initiation of voluntary movement and motor evoked potentials in upper limb muscles. Human movement science. 2002;21(1):101-13.   DOI
13 Jonkers I, Stewart C, Spaepen A, et al. The complementary role of the plantarflexors, hamstrings and gluteus maximus in the control of stance limb stability during gait. Gait & posture. 2003;17(3):264-72.   DOI
14 Kennedy PM, Cresswell AG. The effect of muscle length on motor-unit recruitment during isometric plantar flexion in humans. Experimental brain research. 2001;137(1):58-64.   DOI
15 Ford LE, Huxley AF, Simmons RM, et al. The relation between stiffness and filament overlap in stimulated frogmuscle fibres. Journal of Physiology. 1981;311(1):219-49.   DOI
16 Huijing PA, Baan GC, et al. Myofascial force transmission causes interaction between adjacent muscles and connective tissue: effects of blunt dissection and compartmental fasciotomy on length force characteristics of rat extensor digitorum longus muscle. Archives of Physiology and Biochemistry. 2001;109(2):97-109.   DOI
17 Vleeming A, Pool-Goudzwaard A, Stoeckart R, van Wingerden J, Snijders C, et al. The posterior layer of the thoracolumbar fascia. Its function in load transfer from spine to legs. Spine. 1995;20(7):753-8.   DOI
18 Andersson G. Epidemiology of low back pain. 1998;69(sup281):28-31.
19 Hodges, Paul W, Carolyn A, Richardson, et al. Altered trunk muscle recruitment in people with low back pain with upper limb movement at different speeds. 1999;80(9):1005-12.   DOI
20 O'Sullivan P. Diagnosis and classification of chronic low back pain disorders: Maladaptive movement and motor control impairments as underlying mechanism. Man Ther. 2005;10(4):242-55.   DOI
21 Dankaerts W, O'sullivan P, Burnett A, et al. Altered patterns of superficial trunk muscle activation during sitting in nonspecific chronic low back pain patients: Importance of subclassification. 2006;31(17):2017-23.   DOI
22 Distefano L, Blackburn J, Marshall S, et al. Gluteal muscle activation during common therapeutic exercises. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009;39(7):532-40.   DOI
23 Hoy D, Brooks P, Blyth F, et al. The epidemiology of low back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2010;24(6):769-81.   DOI
24 Mooney V. Coupled motion of contralateral latissimus dorsi and gluteus maximus: its role in sacroiliac stabilization. Movement, Stability, and Low Back Pain. 1997.
25 Van Wingerden J, Vleeming A, Buyruk H, Raissadat K, et al. Stabilization of the sacroiliac joint in vivo: verification of muscular contribution to force closure of the pelvis. Eur Spine J. 2004;13(3):199-205.   DOI
26 Janda V. On the concept of postural muscles and posture in man. 1983;29(3):83-4.   DOI
27 Hossain M, Nokes L. A model of dynamic sacro-iliac joint instability from malrecruitment of gluteus maximus and biceps femoris muscles resulting in low back pain. Med Hypotheses. 2005;65(2):278-81.   DOI
28 Sahrmann S. Diagnosis and treatment of movement impairment syndromes. Elsevier Health Sciences. 2002.
29 Wilson J, Ferris E, Heckler A, et al. A structured review of the role of gluteus maximus in rehabilitation. 2005;33(3).
30 Hodges P, Moseley G. Kinesiology. Pain and motor control of the lumbopelvic region: Effect and possible mechanisms. 2003;13(4):361-70.   DOI
31 Hungerford B, Gilleard W, Hodges P, et al. Evidence of altered lumbopelvic muscle recruitment in the presence of sacroiliac joint pain. 2003;28(14):1593-1600.   DOI
32 Leinonen V, Kankaanpaa M, Airaksinen O, et al. Back and hip extensor activities during trunk flexion/extension: Effects of low back pain and rehabilitation. 2000;81(1):32-7.   DOI
33 Arab AM, Haghighat A, Amiri Z, et al. Lumbar lordosis in prone position and prone hip extension test: Comparison between subjects with and without low back pain. Chiropr Man Therap. 2017;25(1):8   DOI
34 Chance-Larsen K, Littlewood C, Garth A, et al. Prone hip extension with lower abdominal hollowing improves the relative timing of gluteus maximus activation in relation to biceps femoris. Man Ther. 2010;15(1):61-5.   DOI
35 Jeon IC, Hwang UJ, Jung SH, et al. Comparison of gluteus maximus and hamstring electromyographic activity and lumbopelvic motion during three different prone hip extension exercises in healthy volunteers. Phys Ther Sport. 2016;22:35-40.   DOI
36 Kang SY, Jeon HS, Kwon O, et al. Activation of the gluteus maximus and hamstring muscles during prone hip extension with knee flexion in three hip abduction positions. Man Ther. 2013;18(4):303-7.   DOI
37 Joshua. C, Stock MS, Hernandez JM, et al. Additional insight into biarticular muscle function: The influence of hip flexor fatigue on rectus femoris activity at the knee. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2018;42:36-43.   DOI
38 Tassi N, Guazzelli JF, Goncalves M, et al. Electromyographic evaluation of the rectus femoris muscle during exercises performed on the leg press. 1998;38(4):223-9.
39 Kahlaee AH, Ghamkhar L, Arab AM, et al. Effect of the abdominal hollowing and bracing maneuvers on activity pattern of the lumbopelvic muscles during prone hip extension in subjects with or without chronic low back pain: A preliminary study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2017;40(2):106-17.   DOI
40 Vogt L, Banzer. Dynamic testing of the motor stereotype in prone hip extension from neutral position. 1997;12(2):122-7.   DOI
41 Magee DJ. Orthopedic physical assessment-e-book. Elsevier Health Sciences, 2014.