Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.13066/kspm.2019.14.2.97

Predictors Related to Activity Performance of School Function Assessment in School-aged Children with Spastic Cerebral Palsy  

Kim, Won-Ho (Department of Physical Therapy, Ulsan College)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society of Physical Medicine / v.14, no.2, 2019 , pp. 97-105 More about this Journal
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study examined the factors related to school-based activity performance in school-aged children with spastic cerebral palsy (CP). METHODS: The Gross Motor Function Systems (GMFCS), Manual Ability Classification System (MACS), Communication Function Classification System (CFCS) as functional classifications, and the physical activity performance of the School Function Assessment (SFA) were measured in 79 children with spastic CP to assess the student's performance of specific school-related functional activities. RESULTS: All the function classification systems were correlated significantly with the physical activity performance of the SFA ($r_s=-.47$ to -.80) (p<.05). The MACS (${\beta}=-.59$), GMFCS (${\beta}=-.23$), CFCS (${\beta}=-.21$), and age (${\beta}=-.15$) in order were predictors of the physical activity performance of the SFA (84.8%)(p<.05). CONCLUSION: These functional classification systems can be used to predict the school-based activity performance in school-aged children with CP. In addition, they can contribute to the selection of areas for intensive interventions to improve the school-based activity performance.
Keywords
Cerebral palsy; Functional classification systems; School function assessment;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Schenker R, Coster W, Parush S. Participation and activity performance of students with cerebral palsy within the school environment. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27(10):539-52.   DOI
2 Sin YN, Park SH, Lee JY, et al. Validity and reliability of the Korean version of the school function assessment. Korean J Soc Occup Ther. 2014;22(4):27-37.
3 van Gorp M, Van Wely L, Dallmeijer AJ, et al. Long-term course of difficulty in participation of individuals with cerebral palsy aged 16 to 34 years: a prospective cohort study. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2019;61(2):194-203.   DOI
4 Wood E, Rosenbaum P. The gross motor function classification system for cerebral palsy: a study of reliability and stability over time. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2000;42(5):292-6.   DOI
5 Barnes D, Linton JL, Sullivan E, et al. Pediatric outcomes data collection instrument scores in ambulatory children with cerebral palsy: an analysis by age groups and severity level. J Pediatr Orthop. 2008;28(1):97-102.   DOI
6 Case-Smith J. Occupational Therapy for Children (5th ed). Mosby. 2005.
7 Coleman A, Weir KA, Ware RS, et al. Relationship between communication skills and gross motor function in preschool-aged children with cerebral palsy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94(11):2210-7.   DOI
8 Compagnone E, Maniglio J, Camposeo S, et al. Functional classifications for cerebral palsy: correlations between the gross motor function classification system (GMFCS), the manual ability classification system (MACS) and the communication function classification system (CFCS). Res Dev Disabil. 2014;35(11):2651-7.   DOI
9 Coster WJ, Deeney T, Haltiwanger J, et al. School Function Assessment, User's manual. San Antonio : Psychological Corp. 1998.
10 Davies PL, Soon PL, Young M, et al. Validity and reliability of the school function assessment in elementary school students with disabilities. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2004;24(3):23-43.   DOI
11 Effgen SK, McCoy SW, Chiarello LA, et al. Outcomes for students receiving school-based physical therapy as measured by the school function assessment. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2016;28(4):371-8.   DOI
12 Eliasson AC, Krumlinder-Sundholm L, Rosblad B, et al. The Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) for chidren with cerebral palsy: Scale development and evidence of validity and reliability. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2006;48(7):549-54.   DOI
13 Gates PE, Otsuka NY, Sanders JO, et al. Relationship between parental PODCI questionnaire and School Function Assessment in measuring performance in children with CP. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008;50(9):690-5.   DOI
14 Gray L, Ng H, Bartlett D. The gross motor function classification system: an update on impact and clinical utility. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2010;22(3):315-20.   DOI
15 Gunel MK, Mutlu A, Tarsuslu T, et al. Relationship among the Manual Ability Classification System (MACS), the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS), and the functional status (WeeFIM) in children with spastic cerebral palsy. Eur J Pediatr. 2009;168(4):477-85.   DOI
16 Hidecker MJ, Paneth N, Rosenbaum PL, et al. Developing and validating the Communication Function Classification System for individuals with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011;53(8):704-10.   DOI
17 Himmelmann K, Lindh K, Hidecker MJ. Communication ability in cerebral palsy: a study from the CP register of western Sweden. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2013;17(6):568-74   DOI
18 Howard J, Soo B, Graham HK, et al. Cerebral palsy in Victoria: motor types, topography and gross motor function. J Paediatr Child Health. 2005;41(9-10):479-83.   DOI
19 Huang CY, Tseng MH, Chen KL, et al. Determinants of school activity performance in children with cerebral palsy: a multidimensional approach using the ICF-CY as a framework. Res Dev Disabil. 2013;34(11):4025-33.   DOI
20 Hwang JL, Davies PL. Rasch analysis of the School Function Assessment provides additional evidence for the internal validity of the activity performance scales. Am J Occup Ther. 2009;63(3):369-73.   DOI
21 Jain A, Sponseller PD, Shah SA, et al. Subclassification of GMFCS Level-5 cerebral palsy as a predictor of complications and health-related quality of life after spinal arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016;98(21):1821-8.   DOI
22 Majnemer A, Shevell M, Law M, et al. Participation and enjoyment of leisure activities in school-aged children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008;50(10):751-8.   DOI
23 Malt MA, Aarli A, Bogen B, et al. Correlation between the Gait Deviation Index and gross motor function (GMFCS level) in children with cerebral palsy. J Child Orthop. 2016;10(3):261-6.   DOI
24 Morris C, Barlett D. Gross motor function classification system: Impact and utility. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2004;46(1):660-5.
25 Ohrvall AM, Eliasson AC, Lowing K, et al. Self-care and mobility skills in children with cerebral palsy, related to their manual ability and gross motor function classifications. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2010;52(11):1048-55.   DOI
26 Palisano RJ, Hanna SE, Rosenbaum PL, et al. Validation of a model of gross motor function for children with cerebral palsy. Phys Ther. 2000;80(10):974-85.   DOI
27 Park EY, Kim WH. Relationship between activity limitations and participation restriction in school-aged children with cerebral palsy. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015a;27(8):2611-4.   DOI
28 Park EY, Kim WH. Relationship between function classification systems and the PEDI functional sills in children with cerebral palsy. Phys Ther Kor. 2014;21(3):55-62.   DOI
29 Park EY, Kim WH. Relationship between the gross motor function classification system and functional outcomes in children with cerebral palsy. Indian J Sci Technol. 2015b;8(18):75902-7.
30 Park EY, Lee YJ, Kim WH. Reliability of the manual ability classification system for children with cerebral palsy. Phys Ther Kor. 2010;17(1):62-8.
31 Parkes J, Hill N, Platt MJ, et al. Oromotor dysfunction and communication impairments in children with cerebral palsy: a register study. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2010;52(12):1113-9.   DOI
32 Paulson A, Vargus-Adams J. Overview of Four Functional Classification Systems Commonly Used in Cerebral Palsy. Children (Basel). 2017;4(4).
33 Pfeifer LI, Silva DB, Funayama CA, et al. Classification of cerebral palsy: association between gender, age, motor type, topography and Gross Motor Function. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2009;67(4):1057-61.   DOI
34 Rabinovich RV, Patel NV, Gates PE, et al. The Relationship between the School Function Assessment (SFA) and the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) in Ambulatory Patients with Cerebral Palsy. Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 2015;73(3):204-9.
35 Rosenbaum P. Cerebral palsy in the 21st century: is there anything left to say? Neuropediatrics. 2009;40(2):56-60.   DOI