Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.13066/kspm.2012.7.4.493

The Effect of Self-controlled Feedback on Proprioception in Elbow Flexion of Healthy Subjects  

Yoon, Jung-Gyu (Department of Physical Therapy, Namseoul University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society of Physical Medicine / v.7, no.4, 2012 , pp. 493-500 More about this Journal
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate effect of self-controlled feedback on proprioception in elbow flexion. METHODS: Thirty young adult volunteered to participate and were randomly assigned to one of three groups (self-controlled, yoked, control). Power and velocity in elbow flexion was measured by PRIMUS RS (BTE Tech., Hanover, U.S.A). Statistical analysis was used multivariate ANOVA to know effect of self-controlled feedback on proprioception in elbow flexion. Post hoc was used Scheffe. RESULTS: In acquisition phase to practice effect, variable errors in self-controlled group was significantly low scored more than yoked and control group. In retention phase to learning effect, variable errors in self-controlled group was significantly low scored more than yoked and control group. CONCLUSION: Self-controlled feedback was more effective on movement control when the learner could make a decision about receiving feedback after the trial. This seems to support the view that self-controlled feedback benefits learning, because learners can make a decision about feedback based on their performance on a given trial.
Keywords
Self-controlled feedback; Proprioception; Elbow flexion;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Butler MS, Reeve TG & Fischman MG. Effects of the instructional set in the bandwidth feedback paradigm on motor skill acquisition. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1996;67(3):355-9.   DOI
2 Carnahan H, Vandervoort AA & Swanson LR. The influence of summary knowledge of results and aging on motor learning. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1996;67(3):280-7.   DOI
3 Chiviacowsky S & Wulf G. Self-controlled feedback: does it enhance learning because performers get feedback when they need it? Res Q Exerc Sport. 2002;73(4):408-15.   DOI
4 Chiviacowsky S & Wulf G. Self-controlled feedback is effective if it is based on the learner's performance. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2005;76(1):42-8.   DOI
5 Chiviacowsky S, Wulf G, de Medeiros FL et al. Self-controlled feedback in 10-year-old children: higher feedback frequencies enhance learning. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2008;79(1):122-7.
6 Chiviacowsky S, Wulf G, Lewthwaite R et al. Motor learning benefits of self-controlled practice in persons with Parkinson's disease. Gait Posture. 2012;35(4):601-5.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Huet M, Jacobs DM, Camachon C et al. Self-controlled concurrent feedback facilitates the learning of the final approach phase in a fixed-base flight simulator. Hum Factors. 2009;51(6):858-71.   DOI
8 Janelle CM, Barba DA, Frehlich SG et al. Maximizing performance effectiveness through videotape replay and a self-controlled learning environment. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1997;68(4):269-79.   DOI
9 Kim SJ. Motor learning and control. Seoul. Daehanmedia. 2001.
10 Kim WC. How the self-controlled feedback affects in the kind of Serial skills' practice and learning. Kyungpook National Univ. Graduate School of Education. Master's thesis. 2011.
11 Lee HW, Kim SG & Yook DW. Comparison of learning effect between self-control feedback and intermittent feedback. Journal of P. E Sport Leisure Studies. 2000;7(1):149-65.
12 Lee TD & Maraj BK. Effects of bandwidth goals and bandwidth knowledge of results on motor learning. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1994;65(3):244-9.   DOI
13 McNevin NH, Wulf G & Carlson C. Effects of attentional focus, self-control, and dyad training on motor learning : implications for physical rehabilitation. Phys Ther. 2000;80(4):373-85.   DOI
14 Sheaves EG, Snodgrass SJ & Rivett DA. Learning lumbar spine mobilization: the effects of frequency and self-control of feedback. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012;42(2): 114-24.   DOI
15 Patterson JT, Carter M & Sanli E. Decreasing the proportion of self-control trials during the acquisition period does not compromise the learning advantages in a self-controlled context. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2011;82(4):624-33.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Schmidt RA & Lee TD. Motor control and learning. 3rd ed. Champaign. Human Kinetics. 2005.
17 Schmidt RA, Young DE, Swinnen S et al. Summary knowledge of results for skill acquisition: support for the guidance hypothesis. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1989;15(2):352-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Widrick JJ, Norenberg KM, Romatowski JG et al. Forcevelocity-power and force-pCa relationships of human soleus fibers after 17 days of bed rest. J Appl Physiol. 1998;85(5):1949-56.   DOI
19 Winstein CJ. Knowledge of results and motor learning--implications for physical therapy. Phys Ther. 1991;71(2):140-9.   DOI
20 Winstein CJ & Schmidt RA. Reduced frequency of knowledge of results enhances motor skill learning. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1990;16(4):677-91.   DOI
21 Wulf G, Clauss A, Shea CH et al. Benefits of self-control in dyad practice. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2001;72(3):299-303.   DOI
22 Yoon JG, Kim MH & Yook DW. The effects of self-controlled learning on balance in hemiplegics. Journal of the Korean Academy of University Trained Physical Therapists. 2005;12(1):36-44.
23 Adler SS, Beckers D & Buck M. PNF in practice: an illustrated guide. Hong Kong. Springer-Verlag. 1994.